SO FALSELY CALLED
Flat Earth, the Reformation,
& the Science Delusion
New Serial Essays
Noel J Hadley
Avoid Science So Falsely Called
© 2017 Noel J Hadley
No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the author. The only exception is by a reviewer, who may quote short excerpts in review.
1st Printing: 2017
For Eric and Ira
Perceiver to the end
- INTRODUCTION: The Holy Spirit Is Alive and Well in Flat Earth—And He Sends His Greetings 15
- “They Will Not Endure Sound Doctrine”—Dismissing the Very Foundation by Which the Gospel Stands 19
- Christianity’s Continued Quarrel with the Bible: The Undeniable Truth of Flat Earth 25
- “Holding the Mystery of Faith in Pure Conscience”—John Locke & the Humanist Overthrow of the Church 29
- “Say Among the Heathen…..the World Shall Not Be Moved” 33
- God Cannot Contradict Himself—Rejection of FLAT EARTH Is Mutiny against the Testimony of the LORD 37
- “Avoid Science So Falsely Called”—the Godly Man Looks Up and Sees the Firmament 43
- “Hast Thou Perceived the Breadth of the Earth, Job?” It’s Flatter than a Pancake 49
- The Planetarian Mocks the LORD—While In His Divine Mercy Does Not Drown Them for It 55
- Everything beyond FLAT EARTH Is a Planetary Illusion (Or So They Claim) 59
- On FLAT EARTH Up Is Up (and Down Is Down) & Polaris Is To the North of Us 63
- “And the Sun Stood Still” | How Faithless Men in a Godless Age Dismiss the Miracles of FLAT EARTH 67
- “Get Behind Me, Satan,” or FLAT EARTH: Why I No Longer Allow the Devil to Read My Bible Out Loud 73
- It’s Time to Finish What Martin Luther Started—FLAT EARTH & the Last Reformation 79
- “MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH (Globe Earth, That Is)” 85
- “Thy Word Is Magnified Above Thy Name” —Inerrancy in Error: There’s the KJV and Then, Quite Tragically, There’s the Rest of Them 93
- “Ye Shall Not Add nor Take Away….” Oral Tradition Inserted into the Written Word is Rebellion against the LORD 103
- “A Doctrine of Demons”—Johannes Kepler’s Journey to the Dark Side of the Moon 109
- “E-MC2” or Masters of the Universe: Mathematics in the Minds of Maniacs 113
- Science, Pseudoscience, & the Antichrist Spirit—Carl Sagan’s Personal Voyage 119
- The Third Reich, the USSR, & Now the USA—A Modern Case of Historical Negationism 125
- History Is Written By the Victors, and Ray Bradbury 133
- The Truest Statement NASA Ever Made Was a Deathbed Confession 137
- WOW, The Special Effects In Space Are Getting Amazing! Who Needs Claymation? 141
- “The Wrong Side of History”—War Criminals Prefer Flat Earth Maps 145
- “Climate Chaos” Does Not Exist in a Terrarium 151
- Ah, the Memories—When the U.S. Landed Satan On the Moon! 157
- It’s Only a Paper Moon, and No Marvel—a Lunar Rock Is a Paper Weight, Accordingly 163
- The Crowning Achievement of Transcendence or Satan’s Hatred of FLAT EARTH 169
- “They Kept Not Their First Estate,” or the Heliocentric Lie: Not of Men but of Angels 173
- That Hidden Darkness—Science & Its Union with Fallen Angels on FLAT EARTH 179
- Gene Roddenberry and Star Trek’s Impossible Five-Year Mission: “To Boldly Go Where No Man Is Ever Capable of Going” 183
- Show Me Your Papers! Sir Isaac Newton’s Secret Confessions (Kabbalah Does Not Exist in FLAT EARTH) 189
- Science and the Spirit Mirror—Our Unending Honeymoon with Angels 197
- Immortality for All—Our Copernican Universe & the Worship of Pantheism 201
- “As Above, So Below”—Occultist Knowledge Isn’t Hidden, We’ve Been Active Participants All Along 207
- “Or Else the Silver Cord Be Loosed”—the Astral Projection of a Space Walk & the ISS Is Its Temple 211
- “Simulation Theory” + New Mathematics & Science = Same Tiresome Damnable Lie 217
- When Not to Speak Thy Mind—Brain-Computer Interface & the Mark of the Beast Has Got Nothing on the Amish 225
- “Childhood’s End”—Arthur C. Clarke’s ‘Three Laws’ In Light of the Science Delusion 231
- “Peace! Peace! They Say, Where There Is No Peace”—Dr. Strange, Marvel Comics & the Religion of Haight-Ashbury In Defiance of the Second Coming of Christ 239
- “Neither Shall Ye Use Enchantment”—There Is No Land of Make-Believe in the Bible 245
- The Face of the Earth Is the Lord’s “Signature,” and Oh, How the Devil Hates It! 249
- “Thou Shalt Not Make Thee Any Graven Image”—Including a Globular One 253
- There Is No Hope of Eternal Salvation Apart From Our Resurrection 257
- The Worship of Intelligence Must Come to an End 261
- “Sola Scriptura!” —Casting Its Light upon the Untidy Face of the Emergent Church 265
- “He Walked With God”—the Darwinian Lie In Conflict With Our True Common Ancestry 269
- FLAT EARTH Is “Divisive” —Proof that We Must Have Nothing to Do With It! 273
- FLAT EARTH Brings Nothing but “Hopelessness & Despair”—Further Proof that It Is Not of God! 277
- We Trust No One in FLAT EARTH—None But God Alone 283
- “I Think, Therefore I Am!”—Humanism’s Assault on FLAT EARTH 287
- God Has Chosen the Very Least of Us to Inherit FLAT EARTH 293
- Biblical Cosmology in Thomas Ken’s “Doxology” 297
- Afterward and Special Thanks 299
“The eyes are witnesses that the heavens revolve in the space of twenty-four hours. But certain men, either from the love of novelty, or to make a display of ingenuity, have concluded the earth moves; and they maintain that neither the eighth sphere nor the sun revolves. Now, it is a want of honesty and decency to assert such notions publicly, and the example is pernicious. It is the part of a good mind to accept the truth as revealed by God, and to acquiesce in it.”
Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560)
“Elements of Physical Science”
INTRODUCTION: The Holy Spirit Is Alive and Well in FLAT EARTH, and He Sends His Greetings
I AM EITHER A BRAVE OR VERY STUPID MAN for agreeing to pen these series of books, as I am still not so old that I shan’t have a few blissful decades left, that is, if I hadn’t done this deed and attached my name to it. I do however see a glaring error in the church—in fact, there are many—and as such do willingly spoil my reputation among the in-crowd, even among family and friends, all in hopes that the Lord might bless my efforts and save a few—or one.
This will not be understood by most to be an effort of love, particularly where the Body of Christ is concerned. I also understand cause and effect well enough to know what happens when one takes a stick to a wasps nest. I shall be bruised for sure. But I am most willing, giving my very life if it comes to it, all for the sake of the Gospel.
Inevitably everyone has their own agenda. This current topic, what I affectionately refer to as the Doctrine of Flat Earth, is not short of them. I myself am certainly far from exempt. But let me just be clear from the beginning; I am in no way advocating the gospel of “waking-up,” nor do I wish to associate with the logic behind it. Such doctrine demands that we are always swimming in the darkness with an agonizing leg cramp, gasping for a fistful of air, never really knowing which new fact is the rightful discernment by which we must truly wake-up to in order to be saved. There are many here in the truther community who wish to alert you to the presence of one Luciferian lie only to supplant it immediately with another. The language is often the same. We must “save ourselves.” And I want nothing to do with it.
Can anybody who is dead save themselves and ascend to heaven on their own? Works-based theology in all their various forms inevitably leads its contributor to the same destination—the second death, and it’s an eternal one. Salvation only comes through the atoning sacrifice of Yeshua Hamashiach. My fullest and only allegiance is to the cross of Christ and, far more importantly, the empty tomb which immediately precedes it. And I will not be so much as bothered to move an inch to the right or the left of this claim. I bring this up now so that there are no surprises. You can expect ample mention of my Lord throughout, as no discussion in Flat Earth is complete without its Creator.
If I woke up, and indeed I did, it was an intervention by the Holy Ghost alone. Not a day goes by that I am not grateful for it. I am often asked what it would take to convince me the Earth is a globe. That’s a pretty tall order, since God Himself would have to take it all back. If I adhere to the Doctrine of Flat Earth, it’s because God’s true unbroken Revelation and Testimony concerning Himself in His creation says it to be true. Feel free to call me a fool. I’m thoroughly used to it by now. But I stand firmly on the belief that God, in His kingdom, will not bring His servants to shame.
Besides, science, true science, will back the Lord in the end. This I am certain of and am willing to be rebuked by God Almighty if I am falsely prophesying. Indeed this is the one and only prophecy I have yet to make in the Spirit, and I hold to it. The Lord’s Testimony concerning Himself and His creation will be rectified in the end.
If its science you’re after, you won’t find too much of that here. There is no shortage of debate where that is concerned. Nor will I hold anybody’s hand and attempt to convince him or her of anything, if it’s proof you’re after. My loyalties lie wholly with the pages of Holy Writ, including all who subscribe to it—and so the purpose of this book is mainly two-fold. It is my intent, knowing the desperate hour in which we live, to expose the terrible Great Delusion of Ball-Earth to as many of my fellow brothers and sisters as possible using the Bible—whoever has been purposed by the Lord to open this book, perhaps out of curiosity—in hopes that their passions for the faith, as well as the joy of their salvation, may be further stoked within this flame.
And secondly, for those who have already subscribed to Flat Earth, or “woken-up,” if you will, I ask now and will continue to do so, that you give the Bible careful consideration, for it gave accurate Testimony all along, despite our frightful rejection of it. The Holy Spirit is calling you. Give Jesus Christ, Yeshua Hamashiach, Creator of the firmament and the heavens above, another chance. He alone can cleanse you of all your sins and grant you eternal life into His Father’s presence.
To the rest of you who doubt the severity of my claim based on your high regard for the University and Institutions of men rather than the Inspired Word, I hereby raise my stick and begin.
“They Will Not Endure Sound Doctrine”—the GREAT APOSTASY or Dismissing the Very Foundation by Which the Gospel Stands
THE FIDDLE IS BEING PLAYED. I CAN HEAR IT and you can too. Meanwhile, western civilization burns.
From here on out we’re running on fumes until the great cathedrals of the materialists and secular humanism lay in the same ruinous heaps as our Roman counterparts, where the sheep and cattle may freely graze. Perhaps we shall drag our feet a little longer, if only because the surmounting strength of our spiritual forefathers passed down more than enough intellectual meat for themselves and their children and their children’s-children alone to consume. We can’t go on like this. We shan’t. Art has nothing left to offer. Gone are the great thinkers and tinkers, revivalists and reformers. Considerate thought is swept away to make room for the politically correct and vulgar. And our self-declared renaissance of technology serves almost no other master than he who seeks to distract us from the obvious—that we are in a very dark place as a people.
“For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears.” 2 Timothy 4:3
We the watchmen have already alerted our congregation to the enemy’s position. It has fallen on deaf ears. They are no longer advancing over yonder, nor are they barging through the outer walls and turrets. No—no! The church itself is seized. A portion of the ceiling has crumbled. Shards of broken glass splinter our feet as we dash through its aisles attempting to extinguish unrelenting waves of fiery darts, and the door is almost battered down by an obstinate people who wish to gnash their teeth at us.
Those who neglect a fight shall soon be starved into submission. Yet the congregation, for the most part, what remains of them, is sound asleep to the sermon. And inevitably it is always the same few persons in the midst of this unfolding scene who takes notice of the clamor. It is he shouting loud enough for everyone to hear, all so that the watchmen, whose warnings serve no other purpose but to annoy him, may be rebuked: “This is so divisive! What does any of this have to do with Jesus?”
Anyone who’s ever run through battle defending the Scripture knows these persons by name. They’re everywhere—in all congregations. “What does any of this have to do with Jesus!?” I myself have slowed down my sprint, even while writing this book, in order to scramble around them. And they like nothing better than to hold us hostage to their sleep patterns.
The materialist and the secular humanist—all under the umbrella of Scientism—reigns supreme. Perhaps our congregation has become so sterilized by the attacks, an endless line-up of them, from the John Locke’s and Rene Descartes and Rousseau’s, the Ralph Waldo Emerson’s, the Marx’s and the Darwin’s and the Nietzsche’s and the Freud’s, the Shakespeare’s and the Steinbeck’s and the Twain’s and the Hemingway’s and the Walt Whitman’s, even the Beatles, that they have somehow now convinced themselves those with an ax to grind are simply arriving for the potluck.
Indeed, those of us who would wish not to have our enemies dressing the part for choir are given the derogatory title of fundamentalist. Calling anyone a fundamentalist is silly. I simply don’t understand the insult. That same person would likely think of himself as not a very religious person, or perhaps just culturally tolerant to decay and enlightened of its stench. And yet culture itself is religion externalized. People always live out their fundamental beliefs, even the atheist. The very definition of hypocrisy is to say one belief and yet live out another. There is only one way to determine true creed, observe the person’s life and culture—or, as they do, not as they say.
When in Rome….
And so we once more observe our own. Here in the western world we have abandoned Christian burial, neglected Sabbath, contracted the birth implosion, entertained our children with conjurers, embraced body mutilation, celebrity worship, homosexuality, transgenderism, turned a blind eye to divorce, abortion, pedophilia, sodomy, bestiality, and most recently transhumanism, and we have helped to make the Day of the Dead, or Halloween, the more celebrated feast than our Lord’s resurrection. We have become an apostate people.
We are so far removed from the creation week that a person, having little idea that we are “made in God’s image,” has lost all hope in knowing whether he was born a man or a woman. The religion of Scientism quickly enforces their drudgery, threatening any fundamentalist bold enough to stand against their global governance, that a man is born a man and a woman a woman and that the two shall leave their father and mother to be united together, a “denier of Science.” It is here in which the Creationist rightly turns to our created order to defend the very foundation by which the Gospel is supported upon, while that same person in the pew shouts, “What does any of this have to do with Jesus!?” And yet the great hypocrisy is that he himself, the Creationist, denies it—the Doctrine of Flat Earth. In his gullibility he has embraced the greatest conspiracy in human history—the lie which seeks to turn men’s gaze away from the Creator and into the vast abyss of the empty, meaningless cosmos. They agree to this, removing the clothes of sound doctrine, not because they are born deaf, but because we have willingly matured into an obstinate people, hard of hearing.
It is a strange thing indeed that sound doctrine—three millennia of it—should be fought for by the superior muscle of our spiritual forefathers only to so suddenly become severed from the Body of Christ. That he who clings to it, the complete unbroken revelation and Testimony of the Lord concerning Himself and His creation—that is, the Doctrine of Flat Earth—should suddenly be the one who is given the title of apostate. That he who thoughtfully considers those who prophesied by it, Moses and the Prophets, the poets, scribes, and Apostles, should now be called a false prophet, if he should take up their mantle. Even in the church day has become night and night day.
The person who does not regard the Lord’s creation as something worth defending by demanding “Jesus has nothing to do with it” clearly lacks peripheral vision, specifically where the human condition meets his own personal discretion. And perhaps, if he cannot understand the beginning, if he defiantly denies it in order to embrace the lie he finds so beautiful, then he cannot truly understand where he is or where we’re headed as a people. Truthfully, his own need for a Savior seems rather bare at this point.
This is the Great Apostasy. We have been fumbling for a light switch through the dark of it for centuries. So long have we been slapping at the walls with blindfolds on that educated men write volumes of books on it, wondering what could possibly have gone wrong with a darkened world which once held such promise.
And yet here it is! Never even fathoming in their minds that such giants as Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, and Newton should be added to that list of apostates, along with our many Scientism overlords whose shoulders they stand upon—for it was with these five men alone which, when their work was done at the end of the day, the old theological truth of our universe was completely swept under the rug, and in its place came a new divine revelation, only it wasn’t from God.
Gone was the doctrine of Flat Earth, as quickly as man in his contempt for Holy Writ could cling to his lusts for human tradition. With that very opening of the gate our enemy was welcomed in. No wonder! No wonder! No wonder! Again I say, No wonder!
If the Gospel faints in the face of apostate society it is because the very foundation by which it stood upon has been washed away by the great deluge of intellectualism. The dominoes have fallen in succession. And the Lord’s true creation was the first among them.
Christianity’s Continued Quarrel with the Bible: The Undeniable Truth of FLAT EARTH
HOW CHRISTIANITY HAS COLLECTIVELY COME TO AGREE with an academic Scientism which claims it knows better than God, I cannot say. But this is the soggy marsh by which we’ve fooled ourselves into building God’s kingdom upon, having conceded to the itching ears and salivating mouths of godless philosophers that ‘not all of the Holy Scriptures are so firm a foundation as we once thought,’ and just look around—western civilization is clearly no better for it. The theology of Flat Earth is inseparable from the Bible’s many other foundational doctrines because God Himself spoke of it—which makes it of equal importance, if not greater still.
“Who is this,” asks God of Job, “who darkeneth my counsel by words without knowledge? Brace yourself like a man.”
If the modern Christian so eagerly joins with the apostasy of heathens and mocks the theology of Flat Earth, it’s likely because they cannot reckon, or even live with themselves having known that the serpent of old has been so relentlessly crafty, even beyond that bitter taste in Eden, as to deceive us all on such a global scale, a fool’s errand such as this. While the unbelieving world squints’ their eyes into the sun seeking out the imaginary curve, the shades have been lifted from those who’ve responded in all humility to the Holy Ghosts beckoning call. The Earth truly is flat. It is a repentance which I myself have mourned. I’ve even wept in solitary moments for my own involvement with the proud delusion of our age. But there is a joy to my salvation, a greater satisfaction still in falling to my knees before God Almighty in submission to His every revelation and knowing. Understand there’s no ego here—no, “I told you so.” Turn to the Bible, stand upon it as your sure footing, and you’ll be welcomed with open arms.
The Bible’s unbending narrative of the miraculous, which drips from its deliciously juicy pages upon our palms and fingertips with each opening, cannot be selectively chosen to suit our own worldview. Think of the walls of Jericho crumbling down as a mere coincidence “when the priests blew with the trumpets and the people shouted with a great shout.” Think of Moses only pretending to plague Egypt, of using medical trickery to heal some in the wilderness while convincing them it was a bronze snake on a pole, of Joshua having only pretended to converse war plans with the Captain of the Lord’s host, or of Elisha’s bones reviving the dead. Think of Balaam’s donkey, Sampson’s strength, Aaron’s rod, Gideon’s fleece, Daniel’s comfort among famished lions, or Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego making themselves fire-proof by a scientific process of which the particulars are not now recoverable. And then think of Christ being not nearly immaculately conceived as we were led to believe, tricking the people into feeding “five thousand men, besides women and children,” having only pretended to raise the dead, to heal the sick, to cast out devils, and Himself to die and rise again. What is the use in reading on? And if we can’t put our faith in the beginning, as the Holy Ghost declares it was so, then how can we be confident of His end declaration?
“Who art thou,’’ asks God of His chosen nation, by His prophet Isaiah; “Who art thou that forgettest the Lord thy Maker, that hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth?”
If we attempt to explain away the miraculous while leaving the historic, we might as well try to ram the gates of heaven down. Actually, from where I’m standing, that is exactly what NASA is doing—a clear retelling of Babel’s damnable tower for the end days—and to no avail. Remove the first foundation and nearly the whole of the remainder collapses down with it. The miraculous intervention of heaven above bleeding into, and furthermore giving definition to (what would otherwise prove the drudgery of human existence), is—as the Bible is concerned—not only as true a history as any other, but far superior.
Flat Earth is the greater telling of this fabricated Late Great ‘Planet’ Earth.
And yet it is the modern Copernican Christian who demands that we today, in his self-declared “renaissance of man,” is the wise one while our distant kinsfolk, the recipients of God’s revelation, were the superstitious ignoramuses. What perversity, I say, that the modern bearer of “faith” prefers the morals of dead heathens and pompous philosophers before the inimitable exemplars of a living Bible.
The moral views regarding the universe always have been and will forevermore continue to be, if we simply brace ourselves like men, put forward by God Almighty. The theology of Flat Earth is indispensable to correct views of the Lord Himself, and with good reason. Whenever human souls depart from God’s unbending principle, as is evident from this “renaissance of man,” or the illuminated parade of humanism unfolding before us, they invariably end by departing from Him—eternally.
“Holding the Mystery of Faith in Pure Conscience”—John Locke & the Humanist Overthrow of the Church
FLAT EARTH IS THE SIMPLEST OF LITMUS TESTS. The Christian, who is presented with facts yet still manages to reject what the Scripture proclaims as truth—should it not adhere to his intellectual preferences—is a humanist. The doctrine is sound. For almost three-thousand years of Judeo-Christian history it was sound. And now quite suddenly, among the self-rationalizing humanists, it is not. For this we can thank great apostates such as John Locke. He has poisoned the well, so to speak. He has contaminated even the waters from which the Christian bends down to drink. And suddenly, yes quite suddenly, the man who thirsts only for and nothing else but the Written Word begins to see his face, Locke’s that is—balancing among the necks and shoulders of those he only a moment ago recognized as lifelong church friends and colleagues.
This, the true Christian will surely come to find, having also learned of his own glaring error—a lifelong oversight regarding the doctrine of FLAT EARTH—and now, repentantly adhering to God’s Word as a lamp unto his feet and light unto his path, will be immediately apprehended by his contemporaries, should they come to find out about it. They will only wish to spare him of his foolishness, as though he is easily detoured, and speaking as an Obstinate unto the Christian Pilgrim, who is fleeing from the City of Destruction, feverishly proclaim (as it was told in John Bunyan’s dream): “There is a company of these crazy-headed coxcombs, that when they take a fancy by the end are wiser in their own eyes than seven men that can render a reason!”
See, the Latitudinarian will not conform to such doctrines which fail to please him, unlike those silly-stitious Puritans of old, who rightly kept to their Biblical beliefs. To such an admirer of the self, human intellect decides what is necessary and what is not. Human reason, he believes, when combined with the Holy Spirit, is a sufficient guide for determining doctrine, including what he may throw out or simply choose to ignore. Special instructions from God make individuals less amenable to human reason, whereas compromise is preferable. This is broad-based Protestantism. Under such leadership, the congregation has forsaken its birthright, Holy Writ, and in a vile adulterous act, has replaced sound doctrine with the autonomous reasoning of its choosing, casting aside dependence on God in hopes of raising human wisdom metaphysically above Him.
John Locke (1632-1704) was a true Latitudinarian, and his influence cannot be overstated. Locke’s “tabula rasa,” an idea which first appeared with “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,” cleverly understood the human to be born knowing nothing, without original sin that is, and thus through reason and education may soon himself be improved upon. He wanted nothing to do with theological mysteries, even though the Bible is filled with them. The Old Testament, he concluded, was far too irrational for civilized thinking. If it cannot be fully explained, he has a right in his “latitude thinking” to reject it.
And besides, what God ultimately cares about, according to Richard Hooker (1554-1600) in his book, “Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity”—he was a precursor for the Latitudinarian—is the moral state of the individual soul. This is still the calling card of the modern-day Latitudinarian. And they’re everywhere, in every religion of man—except for the saved man.
The man who has repented of his glaring error holds up the pages of Holy Writ for all to see. He runs his finger across any number of scripture passages, there’s over a hundred of them, which give in great length the nature of the Lord’s created cosmology.
He shows them that the Earth is indeed a circle (Isaiah 40:22), made with a compass (Proverbs 8:27), laid upon a face (Genesis 1:2). It is bound (Job 26:10) at its ends (Job 38:13), established on pillars (Job 38:4) over the Great Deep (Psalm 104:6), and is fixed forever in place, immovable (Psalm 93:1), with a sun which moves in our stead, complete with a circuit to run (Psalm 19:4-6). It is covered by a solid firmament (Genesis 1:6-8), spread out as molten glass (Job 37:18), containing the sun, moon, and stars (Genesis 1:14-18), with waters above it (Genesis 7:11), which once drowned the entire world in a great deluge but still remains there (Psalm 148:4), and a heaven which establishes God’s throne upon it (Psalm 104:3).
He shows his fellow Christian this most basic doctrine, which for thousands of years has been well understood. But the humanist mind is darkened, and even the special revelation in which he receives from God is mishandled in order to fit his worldview. Such are the times we live in, that a man who adheres to the complete written Testimony of God is considered a degenerate. After guiding him through all of these things the humanist cries out to him, as one would a fool, proclaiming the very line which will likely resound from the highest-sounding prayer towers in hell, “God is lost in the translation!”
“Say Among the Heathen….The World Shall Not Be Moved”
THE WRITERS OF THE BIBLE EXPECTED A STANDARD OF FAITH which is no longer upheld. The heathen, we are told in Psalm 96, has difficulty believing that the world stands still. More importantly, he must be informed of his wrongness. The world shall not be moved. And who shall remind him but the man who fears God? It is painfully transparent however that the Christian and the Jew has failed the simplest aptitude test, where an essential knowledge of God is concerned. The heathen has not only done a far superior job of converting the Christian to his position, but has even gone so far as to convince the so-called man and woman of the faith that they are truly indebted to him for it.
“9 O worship the Lord in the beauty of holiness: fear before him, all the earth. 10 Say among the heathen that the Lord reigneth: the world also shall be established that it shall not be moved: he shall judge the people righteously.” Psalm 96:9-10
God is not an “exchange of ideas” for the imaginative soul. He has already made Himself known. And yet I think back over the last couple of decades, to the various churches my wife and I would attend, always employing the use of the tippy-toe around the Darwinist. You know, the “Christian Darwinist”—we all know one or two of them—the man and woman, shiny around the blushing cheek-bone and squeaky in the ears, who robe themselves for the Sunday choir, bowing their heads reverently in prayer. The “Christian Darwinist,” who believes that nothing in the Bible is true should it contradict our tedious, seemingly eternal crawl beyond the primordial soup, which raises opposition to almost all of it, front flap of leather to the back (except for the geographical maps, if a Bible happens to contain them). If Evolution were true, as the heathen claims, and God made man in His image, then the Lord Himself evolved from the ape.
“Noel, you didn’t get a doctorate in Biology or Geology as we did,” the Darwinist in sheep’s clothing has informed this author, “So don’t even think you know better of the Bible than we!”
To them I say: “The Holy Ghost must not have received a doctorate in Biology either, let alone a masters, bachelor, or associate.”
The Scientific community rejects Stationary Earth, not because true science contradicts it, but because it has become the religion of the land—the humanist religion. Many attempts have been made to establish heliocentricity as true and geocentric Earth as false. Every snark endeavor by the heathen to disprove what God has created and revealed provides yet another pathetic glance into their fraudulent faith. God has granted them use of the chalkboard. He has given us the entire field of vision.
I am expected to believe the Earth is spinning faster than the speed of sound, orbiting the sun approximately 80 times faster than the speed of a bullet, while the sun is hurtling an additional 500 times faster than the speed of a bullet, with the Milky Way moving another additional 1000 times faster than the speed of the bullet. And yet I am expected to visit an amusement park for a thrill. The religion of man is truly tragic. It contains not a single scientific experiment which grants rhyme to reason.
The heathen has likely never heard of true science. True science is kept out of the textbooks just as God’s Testimony is kept out of the textbooks, because both are trustworthy.
He has likely never heard of the James Bradley experiment, which in 1729 proved the ether—the clear sky, or upper region of air beyond the clouds, is not carried along by the Earth. He has little choice but to learn of Einstein’s theory of relativity, which claims ether is a work of fiction, while likely never once hearing of the Sagnac experiment, which in 1913 proved that there was in fact ether. He has no knowledge of Airy’s experiment, which in 1871 proved that the stars move, carried by the ether, while the earth remains stationary. He has likely not learned of the Michelson-Morley experiment, which in 1887, using an interferometer to measure light rays, established that the earth is undeniably stationary. Nor has he heard of the Michelson-Gale experiment, which in 1925 proved once and for all that the ether passes over the Earth once every 24 hours, not the other way around.
He has been kept in the dark regarding all of these honest men along with the meticulous work documented and detailed in every experiment because the high priests of Globe Earth, with their many mathematical equations and chalk board theories, are disproven by all experimental evidence, just as it was with Pharaoh’s priests standing before Moses and Aaron. God frustrated Egypt’s greatest graduates of its Mystery School then, and He still does today. He even hardened Pharaoh’s heart. Apparently, much of history is repeated. They are in error before true science. But far more importantly, they stand in error before God Almighty. His Testimony takes issue with them.
The heathen has little choice but to believe everything is relative. Perhaps this explains why he opens up the pages of Holy Writ and believes God’s Testimony concerning His own creation is also relative, because he is expected not to accept common sense in regards to his own observations.
“But Noel,” protests the Copernican in sheep’s clothing, “You didn’t get a doctorate in Astronomy or physics as we did, so don’t even think you know better of the Bible than we! You’re no Einstein!”
To them I say: “Neither is God, apparently.”
God Cannot Contradict Himself—Rejection of FLAT EARTH Is Mutiny against the Testimony of the LORD
INERRANCY IS BY NO MEANS AN OPTIONAL DOCTRINE for the Christian, as if the purchase of his soul is anything like buying a car with or without leather upholstery and air conditioning. It is the fundamental of fundamentals. Yeshua Hamashiach affirmed the completeness of Scripture. We must therefore adhere to every Word in its original language, understanding its meaning as a man with the honest intent of thoroughly living by its conclusions. Inerrancy acknowledges that the Testimony of God, as breathed by the Spirit, is totally true and totally trustworthy. Only by surrendering to such a doctrine can the Christian rest assured with full satisfactory confidence that God is speaking to him through each sentence, or else we are left to our own devices, fumbling around in the dark catacombs of depraved thinking, and that is indeed a terrifying thought.
Such is a generation as this, rushing wildly with the whirling wind to hold the hands of our Scientism Overlords rather than the Patriarchs of old. It happens the moment they hear someone like me claim that the Earth which Elohim created is stationary and fixed in place, with the sun and the moon and the lights in the firmament moving in our stead. Rather than clinging to the Holy Scriptures for comfort, which should undoubtedly confirm the truth in their favor, they quickly gather travel brochures from globalist government agencies and hold up photos of a cartoon spherical planet as superior to the Word and proof of my folly. But such is a generation as this, watching men fumble around desperately seeking a light switch in a dark room, and unbeknownst to them, stumbling over the very Bible which they claim to adhere to.
“But we have a more sure word.” 2 Peter 1:19
To state that the Hebrew writers of the Bible were simply misinformed, or that God didn’t bother to update the curriculum surrounding the depravity of their educational system, being simple-minded goat herding nomads and all (despite the fact that their neighboring Greeks had no problem imagining a Ball-Earth without God’s help), or that those writers are now suddenly frivolous poets, are all false opinions, and a blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, who is the divine author of the Bible.
Yeshua made this point absolutely clear to Nicodemus: If the Bible would err in the most easily observable secular and earthly matters, how could it be our guide in matters both eternal and spiritual?
“Yea, they despised the pleasant land, they believed not His Word.” Psalm 106:24 (KJV)
It’s all so tragic, this magnetic lie in which all Earth “photos” are admitted fakes, or imaginative renderings accumulated from puzzle-pieces of gathered data, with further license granted for artistic liberty and that extra Photoshop zing, just to make it sparkle. Our church fathers had a word for this—deceit. They furthermore pleaded with us to set aside Science if it held conflict with the Bible. But when faced with the “integrity” of our modern truth-seeking Overlords, what do the old men know?
“Making the Word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.” Mark 7:13
I take no issue with the Bible. The insertion of fantastical ideas into the pages of God’s Word—therein we have conflict. See, I was raised on two proper foundations. Firstly, the Word of God, what is breathed by the Spirit, is totally true and totally trustworthy. It is furthermore clear by the Holy Scriptures opening chapter that God reveals the nature of His created order through Divine Revelation. “In the beginning God created…. (Genesis 1:1)” There is no pre-history which must be uncovered in geologic columns. The Bible unashamedly declares our beginning. And what is described from that beginning to its swiftly approaching end is unlike anything that is currently taught from the pulpit.
Sorry Copernicans, the Bible Never Speaks for the Erroneous Conceptions of Men. Inerrancy must be established in the mind of every Christian. How quickly the doctrine flies right out the window from the most righteous of saints claiming to adhere to it, soon as Scripture begins to present itself in disfavor of the Copernicans—that is, should God’s stationary Earth come into the conversation. The Christians’ faithful and rather shameful retreat to the well-guarded halls of academia is immediately made known. It is clearly the compartmentalized subconscious at work, and the so-called Christian’s only option for comfort among such disparity of admittedly living a lie.
“God is not man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change his mind. Has he said, and will He not do it? Or has He spoken, and will He not fulfill it?” Numbers 23:19 (KJV)
Deep down, anyone who’s grown up with the Bible in their right hand knows, upon hearing such a claim, that the end-product of their hard working tax dollars are the only go-to option for such relief—if this revelation of the Lord be so terrible a truth to the sainthood that relief is needed. Because when faced with the Holy Scripture, in every Biblical account of the Lord’s creation (an estimated 500 of them), not a single verse takes note of gravity, motion of the Earth, or curvature, let alone distant “suns.”
Quite the contrary, a description of the opposite nature is confidently true by all involved writers over the span of a thousand years. True science proves them right. The Apostle Peter actually warned the church of future apostate generations which would overthrow this very doctrine! (2 Peter 3:6) What’s left of my ever-shrinking church generation, and also the fading Baby-Boomers who defiantly cling to their globular blindness like no other; at some deeper morally-conscious level—and unless their theology has otherwise grown irreversibly perverse—they then know this to be true, once the facts are rightly weighed with their own.
“A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness will utter lies.” Proverbs 14:5 (KJV)
And yet the Christian flees into the drawers of his inner-skull, from one contradictory compartment to the next. How else a Christian, when having his conscious presented with the truth of God’s testimony, can equally adhere to the fundamental belief in the Law of Non-contradiction while simultaneously explaining away or worse, mocking God’s own testimony of Himself, I cannot say. God cannot contradict Himself. As the Scripture claims, Let God be true and every man a liar. This is a decision that I myself had to come to terms with, reconciling the glaring error of my ways in the light of this truth, and it is a decision which you also, claiming the Holy Ghost as a personal guide and authoritative voice to your moral conscious, must also make.
“He therefore that despiseth, despiseth not man, but God, who hath also given unto us his Holy Spirit.” 1 Thessalonians 4:8 (KJV)
A pastor with a lifetime of theological degrees listened to my Biblical presentation regarding the doctrine of Flat Earth. Ironically he was so familiar with Hebrew cosmogony that he could quote the Holy Scriptures many passages describing the subject better than I could! Here he’d been indoctrinated at the academic level to disparage with any and all such declarations, even if their originator were God Almighty, while I for my entire life had never been told about it—which of the two is more tragic?
True to the hypocrisy of this most recent reawakening among God’s children, rather than keeping his rebuttal within the Bible to dismiss my foolishness, he said he wanted to “dust off” his physics textbooks, just to prove me in error. This is the position in which he and the entirety of our church leadership, for the most part, has since clung to. Not his Bible, but some physics textbook which, for all I know, is still dusty in the attic. To deny God’s Testimony as fully inspired and true is blasphemy.
Such is a Christian generation as this.
“The wise men are put to shame, they are dismayed and caught; Behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, and what kind of wisdom do they have?” Jeremiah 8:9 (KJV)
“Avoid Science So Falsely Called”—the Godly Man Looks Up and Sees the Firmament
THERE IS GREATER SCIENCE TO BE FOUND IN THE BIBLE AND CATHEDRALS OF OLD than in all the telescopes of astronomy. I shall undoubtedly be labeled a “denier” of Scientism by my Christian peers, and most certainly already have, but if Science with a capitol “S,” even our so-called Christian Scientists, should take issue with Moses, the Apostles and the Prophets, including Yeshua Hamashiach, then becoming an apostate by scientific standards in order to sit down within the host of their blessed company is dining apparel which fits me perfectly well.
Why churches are no longer built under breathtaking domes as those great cathedrals of old once were is a valid question, one in which I would kindly ask of any church goer. Before escaping the enslavement of my own indoctrination in the religion of Scientism, having been taught by Sunday School teachers and pastors alike that God was indeed a Copernican and His own Testimony in the Bible backed the so-called spinning globe model, which they regularly made a point of having me hold—despite three-thousand years of sound and contrary doctrine—I stood beside the empty tomb of Christ in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, Jerusalem, gazing upwards. I gazed in the darkness of my delusional thinking and I pondered the magnificence of such a dome, and why the Byzantines would go out of their way to lovingly construct one as a monument to God Almighty. I pondered it all, and received no answer—for my mind, you see, was still lost in the fog of delusion.
Churches with domes can be found all over the world. Great cathedrals of the Renaissance, Holy Roman and Byzantine Empire all contained them—even the Ottomans. The Holy Sepulcher specifically features a circular “door-way to heaven,” where a pillar of natural light may freely flow through as it wishes, further prompting us to the observation that the sun moves and not the Earth, and even does so exactly where Polaris might sit over the center pole of our own sky. It wasn’t until the Spirit of the Lord awakened me to the doctrine of Flat Earth, undeniable truths which I’d glazed over without suspicion for the entirety of my adult reading, that the question hanging above my head became self-explanatory. When Christians dismantled the Biblical creation model of a self-enclosed system underneath a physical firmament in favor of an infinitely spinning ball, so too went the domes—-there were metaphorical steeples to be raised in their stead.
“And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.” – Genesis 1:6
I shall also be accused endlessly of dishonoring our so-called Christian brothers of the Bunsen burner before God’s Testimony is finally settled, let alone this essay. But I have become accustomed to it. This is my day-to-day biography as of late, turning to the Word as my final authority and becoming berated by the church for doing it. There are those who will surely pour hot ashes on their heads and rip the buttons from their shirt, wailing in lament over such a belief as mine, but know this: If a person with the authority of the Institutions to back him stood under such a dome as the Holy Sepulcher knowing the Bible laid the blueprints necessary for it while simultaneously imagining a globe in its stead, then he was not a Godly man—No, no—he was not then nor is he not now, nor will he ever be, unless he correct his opinion with the Lord’s.
That soul, should he wickedly deny the unbreakable and unchanging revelation of God’s creation, has no regard for the firmament in its intended purpose, a word directly used to translate rāqîa’ (רָקִ֫יעַ) in Biblical Hebrew, or that it is derived from the root raqqə’ (רָקַע), meaning “to beat or spread out,” e.g., the process of making a dish by hammering thin a lump of metal. He would much rather prefer that you believe in a mystical energy field such as “the force” rather than the Bible. He has no regard for the ancient Hebrew, considering them to be a silly and stupid nomadic goat-herding people of superstitious lore, who regarded the firmament as solid, with a sun and moon that moved beneath and which also supported ‘waters’ above it, and would not have subscribed to a globe belief had the Lord bothered to tell them the truth about it.
Why should those ancient people believe such a claim? Because the Holy Ghost said it was so. It was good enough for them. And so it is for me.
So long dead and buried are the great saints of renown, entire ranks of them—they would most certainly take issue and rebuke any such man in my stead—that I fear I shall have to go at him alone. If only we had Aurelius Ambrosius, better known as Saint Ambrose (337-397), to stand beside the man’s ear in my place and demand that he answer him: “For how can we adopt those things which we do not find in the Holy Scriptures?”
Gregory Nyssen, better known as Gregory of Nyssa (335-394), I should be glad of his company also. He would rightly add: “We are not entitled to such license, I mean that of affirming what we please; we make the Holy Scriptures the rule and the measure of every tenet; we necessarily fix our eyes upon that, and approve that alone which may be made to harmonize with the intention of those writings.”
The man who stands under the dome dreaming up his own fanciful fabrications has neglected not only our spiritual fathers in the church, but Moses and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, and the seventy elders of Israel, when they went upon the Mountain and saw with their own eyes the God of Israel. Specifically, “under His feet was something like a pavement made of sapphire, clear as the sky itself,” and as it were the very heaven for clearness (Exodus 24:9-10).” This can literally be translated: “as the bones of heaven in purity,” and we must immediately conclude that such a man has no regard for the holiness of God who, when visiting Moses and Aaron and the Elders of Israel, made a point as to stand on a bone or a fragment or in the very least the very physical substance that originated from the firmament above our heads.
He has refused any such notion that heaven’s very throne is seated upon it—the firmament, that is. He certainly finds Ezekiel to be no credible witness when testifying to this fact, saying: “And above the firmament that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone: and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man above upon it.” (Ezekiel 1:26) Nor does he find a credible witness in the Psalmist, who wrote of the Holy Heaven above our heads, “Praise God in His sanctuary; Praise Him in the firmament of His power (150:1).” And again in Psalm 104, so claims the Psalmist: “Stretching out heaven like a tent curtain. He lays the beams of His upper chambers in the waters.”
Basil of Caesarea, aka Saint Basil the Great (330-379), would surely tighten his eyes upon the man of Science, having a bone to pick with him, and in my place—though I am willing— rightfully proclaim: “The hearers taught in the Scriptures ought to test what is said by teachers and accept that which agrees with the Scriptures but reject that which is foreign!”
If only God made saints as He once did. John Chrysostom (349-407) would have this to say to him: “Regarding the things I say, I should supply even the proofs, so I will not seem to rely on my own opinions, but rather, prove them with Scripture, so that the matter will remain certain and steadfast.”
Still there is enough room enough for Tertullian (155–240) to stand below the dome who, along with Ambrose, Nyssen, Chrysostom, and Basil, would rightly conclude: “I revere the fullness of His Scripture, in which He manifests to me both the Creator and the creation. In the gospel, moreover, I discover a Minister and Witness of the Creator, even His Word. If it is nowhere written, then let it fear the woe which impends on all who add to or take away from the written word.”
But they are long ago dead and buried. There are only a few of us left who regard the full revelation of the Holy Ghost as true, and indeed it is not one apostate who stands within the magnificent cathedrals of old, gazing up at celestial domes and reimagining them into ungodly perversions, but a well-funded army of them, with pastors and teachers everywhere filling in behind.
I fear those few of us who remain will have to go at it alone. We have little choice but to turn their eyes back to the Holy Scripture and correct their vision before they should gaze upwards again, and remind them of the great men of our faith, including Paul, who gave these unforgettable instructions to the young God-fearing Timothy: “20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.” (1 Timothy 6:20-21)
“Hast Thou Perceived the Breadth of the Earth, Job?” It’s Flatter than a Pancake
TO SAY, “KANSAS IS AS FLAT AS A PANCAKE,” would be to speak an inaccuracy, for Kansas, you see, is flatter than a pancake. Actually, according to the meticulous research and findings of Dr. Dobson and Campbell, it’s only the ninth flattest state in the continental United States. Minnesota is flatter, as is Louisiana; Illinois too. Even Texas is flatter. And yet the flattest of these, surrounded on most sides by the level surface of water, is the state of Florida. Furthermore, the continental United States is approximately 2,800 miles across. If the Earth were a globe, the US would have a terrain with a bulge extending approximately 1,306,666 feet (or 247 miles) above sea level, and yet there is none stretching higher than 2.8 miles. Conclusively, the United States of America is also flatter, far flatter, where a pancake is concerned.
Dobson and Campbell’s conclusions, published in The Geographical Review, have never been refuted or challenged, for to do that would be to further expose the false religion of Scientism, you see. Bad news for globe lovers and flapjacks everywhere, according to Dobson and Campbell, the entire world follows the trend of America in that it too is significantly flatter than a pancake.
A God-fearing man or woman should find no discouragement in these findings; for they not only derive from true science—which the uncorrupted Christian claims to adhere to—they affirm the Testimony of our Lord, who once approached Job in a howling whirlwind, commanding that he, “Gird up now thy loins like a man,” and then promptly demanding that he answer if he knew, “Hast thou perceived the breadth of the Earth?”
“1 Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said, 2 Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge? 3 Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me. 4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. 5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? 6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; 7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? 8 Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued out of the womb? 9 When I made the cloud the garment thereof, and thick darkness a swaddlingband for it, 10 And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors, 11 And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy proud waves be stayed? 12 Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the dayspring to know his place; 13 That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it?” Job 38: 1-13
Supposing my reader has experienced an actual tornado, he or she should immediately be hounded with terror at the very thought of God Almighty arriving to their tea party dressed in one. I once was given so little warning of a tornado, hearing no sirens announcing its arrival, and with limited options available outside, clung tightly to a metal pole which dug into a concrete foundation. My only other action was to fight the sharp blade of its wind, which sliced into the softness of my eyes, and hoped to keep them agonizingly open so as to bear witness to what I would only describe as the cracking of many whirling locomotives tumbling over each other in sound as it lifted the water from a lake and violently heaved it upon dry ground. And unlike Job’s timeless encounter, my tornado wasn’t a meeting with God.
The breadth of the Earth and so many other questions which the Lord asked of Job from the raging wind were no doubt rhetorical in nature. So when God demanded that he should answer if he knew, supposing he could muster the breath in his lungs, the response was a clear and resounding, No! Job could not possibly have perceived the breadth of the earth. It was immeasurable by Job or any other man. If this were the case, then why do so-called God-fearing Christians assert that Eratosthenes of Cyrene was able to measure the circumference of the earth with nothing more than a friend and a couple of sticks? False teachers surround us everywhere.
Ask any builder who employs a snap or chalk line for his foundation if he would consider doing so on one that was rounded or globular, for the Lord our master-builder “hath stretched the line upon it.” By the Lord’s own Testimony flatness abounds. It was He who laid the foundations of the earth and its cornerstone accordingly, furthermore fastening those foundations and holding the ends of it.
The proud “man of the faith” who gnashes his teeth and stomps his feet at the slightest proof of the Earth’s flatness declares the Lord a liar by his obnoxious actions, even if he should in his denial politely brush the thought aside. He would have us all believe that God was writing a syrup-laced holiday card in that storm, sticky to the touch with its abstract yet heart-felt poetry, and specifically directed to the cultural comforts of a primitive un-schooled people, who would not have believed a “globe-revelation” in a tornado had He even bothered to tell them about it, rather than us post-enlightenment Gentiles who figured it all out on our own. He would rather convince you of his own damnable falsities, that Eratosthenes sidestepped around God’s challenge easily enough, as textbooks will surely claim, or perhaps just proved the Lord facetious. This would seem far more pleasing to him, as would the explanations of the many commentators whom I’ve read, rather than confess to his own factual wrongness or let such contradictory matters, what Dr. Dobson and Campbell’s findings have fully confirmed and proven, expose his souls condition; that God, being our master-builder as pointedly described, is a dreadful thought to his well-being.
To this we can know for sure. When God spoke to Job, just as He spoke to the Prophets and the scribes and the poets and the Apostles, he did not converse merely with them, but through them he addressed all generations of people, including our own. But in Job’s particular case, God wasn’t merely speaking. He was dropping a challenge.
Can you, dear reader, measure the breadth of the Earth, and if so—if you stubbornly accept the challenge, will you gird up your loins like a man and stand before God Almighty in the roar of a whirlwind—will you stare into the eye of that funnel and claim the contrary? Will you call the Lord a liar?
You’re answer waits.
The Planetarian Mocks the LORD—While In His Divine Mercy Does Not Drown Them for It
THE LORD LAUGHS AT THE WICKED, FOR HE KNOWS THEIR DAY is coming. Yet mankind, in his continual lust for the next fashionably evil deed, cocks his head devilishly at the Lord, thinking that He is entirely like them. And what does the church do? The so-called Christian, rejecting the Testimony of God—specifically concerning His own Creation—eagerly share in the planetary delusion for fear of missing out on the festivities, and so has faithlessly neglected one tiny detail. “The earth stands out of the water and in the water:”
“3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, 4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: 7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.” 2 Peter 3: 2-7 (KJV)
The very waters which Moses wrote of, as one taking up the pen for the Holy Ghost, and which drowned the entire world in the Great Deluge of Noah’s flood, currently sits right this very moment above our heads. Look up! Even by night the host of twinkling stars attests to this. No wonder God has hidden Himself in the globular model—always in need, I am told, of being discovered by our men in lab coats. God will not be found in “outer space” no matter how strong the lens of our telescope, because He is not a Copernican!
“18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:” Romans 1:18-20 (KJV)
When the Deluge began, with gushes of celestial water plummeting down past the sun and the moon to the cosmic floor of the entire created universe, what horror must have overcome those who had for so long heard the preaching of Noah but had refused to listen to his call for repentance, as his warning was now too late to be acted upon. The flood did not happen by a sudden gathering of clouds—as if rainfall or the cracks-and-crevices within a proposed globe could produce enough water to rise fifteen cubits above Mount Everest—nor did it happen to the satisfaction of a method beyond which God no longer has in His arsenal of tricks.
Had it not been for a divine promise, marked ironically by the very rainbow which the fashionably current man claims for his own purposes, the Lord could yet again grieve of our making and open a window in the heavens, thereby drowning us all. If the rainbow is arched as a circular dome, one might easily conclude it is only because it takes after the firmament spread out like molten glass, which even now mercifully protects us and holds back the judgement.
“And God said: Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.” Genesis 1:6 (KJV)
If only our so-called God-fearing astronomers, who eagerly snare the church into Satan’s globe delusion by rejecting the Lord’s very testimony which they claim to advocate in their imaginative twisting of it, would respond as Job to the Lord, when he was challenged of his own ignorance, took it like a man, and then cried in a voice loud enough for the ages: “I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee, wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes!”
Everything beyond FLAT EARTH Is a Planetary Illusion (Or So They Claim)
IF SUCH A THING WERE HUMANLY POSSIBLE, THAT IS to find the so-called curve of the Earth from any obtainable position by having to look down upon the horizon in the slightest degree—living on a ball demands this from its most loyal of subscribers—the unquestioning ranks of our globular brethren would immediately make a holiday of it, and would joyfully rip the buttons from their gowns and hug each other with gifts and songs of jubilee. But in the absence of such festivities, until five-hundred years of chalkboard equations can be observed without the intervention of government sponsored television programming, we subscribers to sound perception and faithful interpretations of the Holy Bible will have to settle for being called such names as fopdoodles and dew-beaters by the online brown shirts of academia.
For centuries Copernican globe-trotters were so set upon countering the Bible’s belief in a stationary creation that all they needed to prove their rightness was some sort of “flying contraption.” That call was answered by meteorologist James Glaisher who, from July, 1862, to the 26th of May, 1866, succeeded in 28 ascents with a balloon, the most memorable being the 5th of September, 1862, when an altitude of 37,000 feet—or seven miles—was attained. According to his own testimony, the climb almost cost him his life.
At an altitude of 6 miles, in Glaisher’s account, the Earth appeared as a huge bowl, with the edges (or his horizon) stretching 200 miles away at every point on the compass, and on a dead level with the car of the balloon. In another part of the record he states: “All perception of comparative altitudes of objects, on or near the ground is lost; houses, trees, the undulations of the country, etc., are all reduced to one level; everything, in fact, seems to be on the same level; and the whole has the appearance of a plane. Everything seen looking downwards from a balloon, including the clouds, seems projected upon one visible plane beneath.”
Again, he states: “Always, however great the height of the balloon, when I have seen the horizon, it has appeared to be on the level of the car… I have never seen any part of the surface of the Earth—from a balloon—other than as a plane.”
Of course, when the Copernicans could no longer provide evidence of their counter-Biblical worldview, they turned to the victorious government of the Second World War for financial aid—and specifically what that government controlled, television. I wonder, knowing now that I subscribe to the doctrine of Flat Earth, if my parents and school teachers would eagerly retract that advice they so often offered: “Don’t believe everything that you see on TV.”
Is it not odd that the Earth remains just as flat and consistently eye-level among all testable civilian observances, currently so high as 76-miles by my reckoning, as James Glaisher’s balloon missions over 150 years ago—that is, until the government becomes involved with the footage, in which our stationary plane (at much lower altitude than 76 miles) suddenly becomes somewhat planetary in nature. You know, fuller around the middle. Here-in lies the problem, because by the Copernicans own calculations, the observer, under the conditions of such an altitude as Glaisher’s must look down to perceive his horizon, yet this simply isn’t so. Outside of multi-billion dollar tax-payer government agencies, such a phenomena has never been observed.
A ball earth must define its own horizon, not the other way around. And yet the vanishing ship trick is still chattered about among tutors to their pupils and grown-ups with lofty degrees as proof of the globe despite the highest of elevations demonstrating without fail that the observer makes his own horizon and not the earth. People argue until the cows come home over who is more educated, the team player or the independent thinker, and yet it is the courageous man who can stand alone and admit that he’s been misled.
We know it is impossible to see that which is non-existent, and yet this is the case which is argued again and again and tirelessly again among those who simply can’t tolerate the fact that their own eyes defy their belief in Scientism. It is the necessary doctrine, I am told by those who wish to retract my education, that our eyes cleverly deceive us, always—that the horizon must sink downwards, according to globular measurements, and therefore everything extending beyond what is given allowance for is an elaborate and imaginative stage production of mother nature—a mirage, or light refraction.
This is the reason, I am told by my detractors, why we will never observe mountain ranges, cityscapes, or distant landmarks bending away from us (even from a high-altitude airplane or weather balloon), just as what one would expect of a ball. Mother nature always creates the necessary conditions to cosmetically lift what is supposedly hidden below the horizon into view, (sometimes thousands of feet!) and for our entertainment mind you, so that the earth irons out as a wondrous plane with an equally convex ocean, always without fail rising to eye-level rather than sinking away, furthermore evolving the necessary conscious to calculate the observers whereabouts in proportion to her phantoms and elevate those deceitful illusions in a perfect vertical stance, rather than bending away at an angle, so that the observer, no matter his position or altitude, will always without fail be fooled into thinking the Earth is a plane when in fact it is a globe.
On FLAT EARTH Up Is Up (and Down Is Down) & Polaris Is to the North of Us
WHEN WHAT REMAINS OF THE CHURCH IS SEIZED AND CARRIED OFF BY FORCE in the “Harpazo,” what Paul referred to as our blessed hope—I am expected of my Copernican contemporaries to believe that a great many of us will be whisked side-to-side, north, south, east or west of us—literally in any given direction of a globular compass—ascending and descending again over and around the circumference of the spheroid or “pear-shaped” Earth before we are allowed our final vertical ascent to gather with the Lord. Furthermore, as He is physically embodied and therefore restricted to space, we must assume there will be some great light refraction employed in order for every eye to see Him, with emphasis on the illusion, so that the observer may be tricked into thinking they are really seeing the Lord when in fact they are looking upon a superior mirage embedded well-beyond the very curvature He allowed for.
I am not in any way mocking the Word of God, nor am I dismissing the long-promised blessed hope of the Lord’s return, but rather, as one who strictly adheres as a Biblical Literalist to the pages of Holy Writ, I would like the reader to understand that such language which must be inferred upon for the Doctrine of “Globe Earth” to co-exist among the Bible’s day-to-day players simply isn’t given. Such nonsense was not even in the hindsight of Hebrew thinking, led no less than by the Holy Ghost, who guided each stroke of their pen.
In the entire canon of Scripture there is never an example imparted which will naturally lead its modern interpreter to believe that heaven is east or west of us, side-to-side, here among us, and certainly not below. If heaven is any number of dimensions removed from ours, why are we then led to believe a person must travel in the up direction, being fully visible to the grounded viewer for the duration of that person’s entire ascent, so as to reach the heights of highest heaven? The simplest employed logic should undoubtedly show that the Hebrew writer was not thinking in terms of a spinning globe traveling at several-hundred-thousand miles per hour through an infinite measurement of cosmos. If I am to take the stroke of the Hebrew’s pen to its word, it appears as though the whole of God’s Testimony takes place in an enclosed system, with the highest heaven heralding its crowning focus.
So when Elijah was taken to heaven, naturally he went up. “And Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.” 2 Kings 2:11 (KJV)
Yeshua went up too. “And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.” Acts 1:9 (KJV)
When they built the tower up, God said, “Let us go down.” Genesis 11:7. And to Moses God spoke, “I am come down to deliver them.” Exodus 3:8.
One of the very first Scripture verses which came to the forefront of my mind, once I’d discovered this marvelous truth of Flat Earth, is Philippians 2:10, where Paul writes: “that at the name of Yeshua every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth…” Given the fact that bowing before Yeshua is a mandatory observation for all, I can conclude that he wasn’t being metaphorical when he described those above or those below.
And where might this heaven be, if it is situated above us? Why, to the north, of course!
If a boy fixes his eyesight on Polaris, the northern-most star, the luminaries will surely swing around it in a counterclockwise position, though Polaris itself moves not an inch. Let’s say that boy can see Polaris through a single pane of glass in his childhood home and then leaves on extended vacation—to college in the Southern Hemisphere, if you prefer—-and upon returning to his childhood home as an old man some fifty years later, he will undoubtedly find that Polaris is still fixed permanently in place through that very pane of glass, where he last left it for safekeeping.
Considering there was half a century added to his life from the time he last set his gaze upon Polaris through that single plane of glass, history will affirm my correctness in stating that he did indeed trust his senses many times over so as not to die. We can rightfully assume, for instance, that he looked both ways before crossing the street more often than once. Instinctively concluding that no cars were coming, and that indeed no cars ever hit him when he acted upon it, his senses proved an agreeable companion.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson, our modern day enforcer for the religion of Scientism, has defiantly stated, “The Universe is under no obligation to make sense to you.”
Our senses are the most dependable gifts given by God, so that no man is without excuse. Globe logic however teaches us that our senses are recyclable at best, should they supersede the doctrine of Scientism which, if I am to take the globe model as literal, then acts as a daily irritant. The sun and the moon look the same size. They even follow the same circuits in the sky. And yet our Scientists and Astronomers have the inside knowledge that nothing in which the Holy Ghost wrote about of the sun and moon in Creation is true.
The North Star is stationary, just as the Earth is stationary, just as the sun and the moon and the stars in the firmament move about us. Our senses claim all of this to be true.
The Bible does too.
So when the Harpazo happens, for those of us who remain and are seized and carried off by force into our Lord’s good company, we can rightly assume—if the Bible’s Cosmology has anything to say of it—which direction we’ll be traveling in.
And it’s not down.
“And the Sun Stood Still” | How Faithless Men in a Godless Age Dismiss the Miracles of Flat Earth
SO QUICKLY IT HAPPENS, REVERED MEN OF THE CONGREGATION expose their own faithless heart whenever the theory of Scriptural Poetry is promptly applied—that is, as soon as the Holy Ghost does not please their appetite for academic conformity. All Biblical spouts of the poetic, it is argued, are allowed some wiggle room in their exaggeration of historical facts. Such men permit themselves to bend facts quite frivolously into clever sounding figments—also known to our church fathers as deceptions—and this is somehow a good thing. Nowadays everybody is afforded the privilege of being a poet to their own liking. Perhaps this would also explain why there is such a lack of discernment, such tireless confusion, when the fabrications of our hearts are improperly weighed among the virtues of true poetic integrity.
“13 And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.” Joshua 10:13 (KJV)
A miraculous claim is made by this writer of history, and backed no less than by the authority of the Holy Ghost—that the Israelite’s victory over their enemies was due to a promptly answered prayer made by Joshua, in which the sun stood “in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.” It would seem strange, knowing the likelihood that there is seemingly always and without fail a “revered man of the faith” in the room who will undoubtedly subscribe to the theory of Scriptural Poetry upon hearing such claims, how a straight reading seems just as historical from one verse to the next. Such a man makes assertions which have the charm of both intelligence and sincerity, but also the vice of inaccuracy.
The humanist claims: “We know now that couldn’t possibly be true!”
To wrest the Scriptures, to twist and torture its language until it is created in our own image is neither honest nor truly scientific—though I must admit, it is certainly keeping to all that applies of Scientism!
Please, expert on poetry in the room, explain to me where the poetry begins and where it ends. Oh, that’s right, sirs, you’re displeased with the fact that heliocentric materialism has no place to roam, nor freely rest its head, anywhere in your personal translation of the Bible. God Himself, by His own testimony, is conclusively not a Copernican, and does not seek to conform science to the academia of Scientism, which so-called Christian “Creationists” appear to desperately desire rubbing the feet of.
The belief that it was the Earth which held fast and not the sun is not only in disobedience with the entire canon of Scripture, but is not even kept within the facts of “nature,” as the Darwinian or Copernican model would demand. The very attempt to explain it in another light just goes to show the injurious effect, if even a subconscious trauma on the brain, a blind faith in the ability of educated men to grasp at the truth of God has had on the otherwise good intention of such searches, if there is such a thing as good intent. I believe Isaiah the Prophet when he said, “To the Law and to the Testimony; if they speak not according to this Word, it is because there is no light in them (Isaiah 8:20).” However “educated” the humanist mind may be, it is clear that they are not searching for the truth of God in science or any other hallway of academia, if the Holy Spirit and what He has revealed to us in God’s Testimony is not there to guide them. Why we should be so deathly afraid of looking like fools before them is beyond me.
The verb Shemesh, “sun” in Hebrew, means: to run hastily, to move very fast. If I am to take Peter at his word, that “prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost (2 Peter 1:21),” then I am to take the pages of Holy Writ at its word. Are not its very words inspired by God? Paul reminds us, “Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual (1 Corinthians 2:13).”
So when the Holy Ghost employs the word Shemesh, I take it to mean He wanted us to understand the sun as something that runs hastily and moves very fast. Therefore, Joshua 10:13 should be understood as thus: “And the hastily running, very fast moving sun stood still!”
We have no record of Joshua praying to Heaven that the Earth, fixed “immovable and firm (Psalm 96:10),” stand still. This is an assertion, not of the Holy Ghost, but of the “expositor.” What this miraculous account in Joshua instantly reveals is that God hears prayer, and answers it. But when doing so, He never presents obvious falsities or prods men with erroneous interpretations that might lead them out of harmony with the cosmogony so unashamedly revealed, and without a single lick of contradiction, among the many authors of the Word.
Every other imaginative explanation as to the true meaning of this passage in recent church history, and there’s been several, has so far fallen to the wayside, with the expositor in question fading from the spotlight into obscurity of namesake, as hell itself would have it. There is one sacred narrative and only one straightforward view that will never fade from heavens light, and that is the obvious one, for we are told that “there was no day like that, before it or after it, that the Lord hearkened unto the voice of a man, for the Lord fought for Israel.”
The sun stood still in the sky.
“Get Behind Me, Satan,” or FLAT EARTH: Why I No Longer Allow the Devil to Read My Bible Out Loud
SATAN HAS RETARDED THE PROGRESS OF MANKIND’S SALVATION by shaking our faith in God’s testimony, and quite masterfully too, in a two-fold way: Firstly by convincing our spiritual leaders to erase God’s literal account of creation from the recollection of modern civilization. There was a time in my life when I thought such a suggestion to be an impossible task, and yet the doctrine of Flat Earth, as I’ve come to intimately call it, was so far removed from the consciousness of my church—to be fair, the upbringing in any congregation which I can reckon—and the Spirit so thoroughly quenched by the rebellious willpower of men, who advertised themselves as His spokesman for profit, that my generation was never once raised hearing of it; the true doctrine of Biblical Creation as it was literally intended by its writers.
And how did Satan, in his uttermost hatred of God’s created order convince men to commit such wickedness? “It is our justified task as God’s children to spare our Heavenly Father’s reputation,” he speaks into the theologian’s ear, specifically where those raised issues highlighted by Scientism are concerned. “And besides, it would be intellectually modern to do so, because we wouldn’t want anyone to think of us as foolish or stupid now, would we? Need I quote Saint Augustine again?”
How does that go again, Saint Augustine?
To this Saint Augustine of Hippo, I mean, the devil replies:
“Usually, even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and the other elements of this world, about the motion and orbit of the stars and even their size and relative positions, about the predictable eclipses of the sun and moon, the cycles of the years and the seasons, about the kinds of animals, shrubs, stones, and so forth, and this knowledge he hold to as being certain from reason and experience. Now, it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics; and we should take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh it to scorn. The shame is not so much that an ignorant individual is derided, but that people outside the household of faith think our sacred writers held such opinions, and, to the great loss of those for whose salvation we toil, the writers of our Scripture are criticized and rejected as unlearned men. If they find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions about our books, how are they going to believe those books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods and on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason? Reckless and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their mischievous false opinions and are taken to task by those who are not bound by the authority of our sacred books. For then, to defend their utterly foolish and obviously untrue statements, they will try to call upon Holy Scripture for proof and even recite from memory many passages which they think support their position, although they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertion. [1 Timothy 1.7]”
Satan’s true brilliance however was opening up our Bibles for us, once the task was done, and gladly reciting the Scripture with his own lips, specifically directing our attention to the alien beliefs of our superstitious writers of old, who apparently taught through a reputedly infallible teaching of the Spirit a “scientific blunder” that no intelligent person in their right mind could ever believe. And we wouldn’t want anyone to think of us as foolish or stupid now, would we?
How else Genesis and Job and the prophets and the poets could be written, one must conclude after such an insightful examination, than by “the natural conceit of men,” who thought this world of sufficient importance for God to make “two great lights,”—lights merely intended to illuminate this earth and no other pointed destination in “the greater cosmos.” Haven’t broader-thinking men, with coveted degrees to show for it, proven such silly superstitions not to be the case? Is it not us that moves rather than the heavens, despite an Earth, the Spirit would have us believe, which remains immovable?
How small minded Moses and the Hebrews must have been to let ignorance guide their nighttime ponderings when they wrote of the heavens above rather than all around and below us, as our current understanding of a globe in space would have it, or to presumptuously conclude Earth was the cosmic floor of the entire created order, with the sun and the moon and the lights in the firmament moving about, as the Holy Spirit and their senses mutually agreed upon, rather than our current church leaders who would have us believe different—ironically the complete opposite of this stated fact. Uninspired thinking from a small minded man, Satan would have us conclude of Moses, who just so happened to meet God upon the mountaintop before writing it. “But that’s rather unimportant, isn’t it?”
And yet the Apostle Peter, also moved by the Holy Ghost—a man who knew something in the way of speaking for Satan—would have a word or two for those who oppose Moses and the prophets, even if merely twisting the meaning behind them for a more “contemporary” understanding.
“For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.” 2 Peter 1:21 (KJV)
It is indeed a sorry statement to say that a man moved by God’s Holy Spirit was simultaneously misdirected, perhaps even deceived, by “the natural conceit of men.”
To any such reader of the Word, I revoke those rights, and say, “Get behind me, Satan!”
It’s Time to Finish What Martin Luther Started—FLAT EARTH & the Reformation
SOMEWHERE ALONG THE MARCH TO BATTLE THE REFORMERS BANNER cowered before the ranks of its enemy, and when the institutions of our worldly opposition seemed more profitable, their own godless revelations slightly more wise than our own, our church leaders, eager to keep doors open and pews occupied and offering plates passed around again, sliced the outdated slivers of fat off for fear of looking the fool—as if the world doesn’t already think them one—only they did it, they took the surgical knife to the Holy Ghost as a sort of contemporary make-over without letting the rest of us know of it.
Today that very Spirit is opening the eyes of those born into this apostasy, those whom are willing to stand for battle and armored with the full revelation of God. He’s waking His worldwide church with yet another opportunity to kick the devil to the curb by victoriously reclaiming the declaration of old, “SOLA SCRIPTURA!”
“We Christians must be different from the philosophers [i.e. scientists] in the way we think about the causes of these things. And if some are beyond our comprehension (like those before us concerning the waters above the heavens), we must believe them and admit our lack of knowledge rather than either wickedly deny them or presumptuously interpret them in conformity with our understanding.” – Martin Luther.
This is my only purpose in embracing the essential doctrine of Flat Earth, to lift that reformers banner and administer what was so willingly thrown to the wayside by our faithless leaders of present and only recently past. I think very little of myself, certainly not worthy of such a task as this—a shepherd boy standing against the academy of Goliath’s. Yet all the knowledge attributed to my worldly education means nothing when weighed as an imbalance upon the righteous scale which adheres to the Word of God, the very foundation by which the Patriarchs of old and our spiritual forefathers stood upon. I hereby pick up this tattered, trampled-upon flag of battle, the complete reformers banner, and so long as the Lord gives me strength to stand and the breath to speak, to anyone who stands in opposition I hereby proclaim, “Scripture alone.”
“There is talk of a new astrologer who wants to prove that the earth moves and goes around instead of the sky, the sun, the moon, just as if somebody were moving in a carriage or ship might hold that he was sitting still and at rest while the earth and the trees walked and moved. But that is how things are nowadays: when a man wishes to be clever he must needs invent something special, and the way he does it must needs be the best! The fool wants to turn the whole art of astronomy upside-down. However, as Holy Scripture tells us, so did Joshua bid the sun to stand still and not the earth.” – Martin Luther.
The doctrine of Sola Scriptura insists that God has given us a surer word. It takes a strict stance against the vanity of worldly philosophies, human tradition, or counter-revelation by men of the cloth, even those deriving from the halls of Science, if and when they oppose the Lord’s own testimony concerning Him. That sure Word which we hold in our hands is a light-bearer into the glorious reality of eternity itself. The Holy Ghost is not so frivolous a poet—a title sporadically assigned by men who feel His wording does not apply to their higher understandings—as to keep us guessing in the mire of confusion with the plurality of possible meanings. What He has revealed is sure and fundamentally true.
“God has called us to be intelligent, not blind!” comes the wide-nostril reply of those who apparently need something a little bit more intellectually stimulating to their diet rather than the ignoramus wacky silly-doodle conclusions of the star gazing Hebrews. They continue, “God doesn’t expect us to have blind faith without proof!”
Perhaps the often unattainable formulas and equations of high-minded Gnostics, which suits this so-called “hidden knowledge” that only comes with the advanced degrees of academia, is more their thing. The Bible has a renowned reputation for catering to us simple folks. Is the Holy Ghost not my teacher—and what has he advised me?
The Earth we stand upon is immovable, firmly fixed in place, sayeth God Almighty—we call this doctrine Flat Earth—with a sun that moves in our stead. The Scripture holds no suggestions to the contrary.
“The Word of God must not be mocked. I am caught, cannot come out; the text is too powerful. Therefore I say: clean and clear, believe all or believe nothing!” – Martin Luther.
By giving aid to our blindness within this great Satanic deception of a globular Earth, which the Lord Himself takes personal issue with by His every revelation, what do our brotherly adherers to the cult of Scientism do when they’re caught in the apostasies of their Scriptural teachings? They resort to a conscientious display of mockery—as if the Darwinists will run to their rescue! Does this unbelieving generation not understand; it isn’t me they mock, but the Lord.
Luther’s reformation is far from over. I say its high-time we finish what he started.
The great 19th century German author, poet, statesman, and intellect Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said of the Copernicans, “Be it as it may, it must be laid down that I curse the accursed lumber-room of this modern conception, and certainly some young, ingenious man will arise who has the courage to oppose this universal, crazy nonsense!”
To Goethe, I raise my hand—though a nobody. And I answer across the two-century void, “Mr. Goethe, here I stand.”
“MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH (Globe Earth, That Is)”
THE PROTESTANT REFORMERS WERE CERTAINLY NOT SHY when promoting the Roman Catholic Church as “the Whore of Babylon.” Indeed, Greco-Roman culture had infiltrated its every rank of papacy, despite Roman Catholicism’s claim to the contrary. Pagan ceremonies, many of which funneled through Pergamum, were cleverly masked with Christian symmetry, once Emperor Constantine successfully merged the two together. As such, heathen festivals were converted into ‘Holy Days’ so that deities of solar monism such as Mithras or the Spring Equinox and Esther could be upheld by its devotees. Saints stood in for occultist idols, just as Mary the Mother of Christ stood in for the Vestal Virgins. Transubstantiation seemed to originate with the rest of them, not only with the reemergence of Aristotle, but in the various hidden mystery schools of Greece and ancient Egypt and Babylon, and in such a way that a devotee to that serpent of old could worship him in plain sight.
Even the pope’s title, which he proudly wears on his crown, is VICARIUS FILII DEI, or Vicar of Christ. Strange indeed, since he is making a blasphemous and totally unashamed statement that he is publically taking the office of our High Priest, Yeshua Hamashiach. Martin Luther and the Reformers were certainly not shy of this either, rightly labeling him his Greek-language counterpart rather than the Latin, Anti-Christ. For this is what he is, by his own disclosure. And the number of his name is 666.
“Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.” 1 John 2:18
Yes, it certainly is strange in light of this, should modern Christians consider the Jesuit a friend to his—he is certainly no companion with the authority of Scripture. Indeed, the Reformation must be an unpleasant feculence in the pages of church history for that obtuse Christian who eagerly attempts harmony with the very totalitarian institution, and the Jesuit Pope they’ve recently put into power, which formed only out of a perverse necessity to sever and destroy Luther, Calvin, Knox, and their band of rebels with a counter-reformation of the their own.
It is said of the Spanish noble Ignatius Loyola that, while lying wounded with fits of fever in a hospital bed, a vision of the Virgin Mary encouraged him to found the Society of Jesus in 1534. The Protestant historian Wylie writes, “He who lay down on his bed the fiery soldier of the emperor rose from it the yet more fiery soldier of the pope.”
Loyola developed homespun “spiritual exercises” in order to bring his devotees to godly perfection. In their own words, Jesuits were to be “corpse or cadaver” in order to “unhesitatingly obey” the will of their superiors. Through systematic meditation, prayer, contemplation, visualization, and illumination, Loyola and his followers would mystically slink and slither into trances of ecstasy, where they might encounter the face of God or Christ in person. He was even seen to levitate off the floor, as have many Jesuits completely under satanic power, and reportedly even worked himself to such enlightenment as to ascend to the heights of heaven. All Loyola truly succeeded in doing is refitting witchcraft with a Christian mask over it. And it worked.
“And it must be confessed,” writes Wylie, “that these new soldiers did more than all the armies of France and Spain to stem the tide of Protestant success, and bind victory once more to the banners of Rome.”
While pushing the Protestant ranks back on all fronts, the Jesuits would succeed in administering a strict coherence to Roman Catholicism, particularly at the Council of Trent, which was fully predicated on ecclesiastical tradition. During Trent’s final session, the arch bishop of Reggio awarded church tradition as authority over Scripture. Among the evidence he cited was the change of Sabbath from the last to first day of the week, which even the Reformers admittedly kept. Indeed, in their insistence on Scripture Alone, the Reformers had succeeded in stirring the pot, and the result was thus: the Roman Catholic Church, having sold its soul to the Devil himself, mustered the motivation to grasp supreme dominance over the world.
This cannot be overstated. The Catholic Church was the motivating force behind Copernicus, persistently urging their reluctant cleric to spread the heliocentric model which openly contradicted and ridiculed Scripture. With Copernicus’ deathbed publication made open to the public, On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, the apostates now had an army to back them. Jesuits were the perfect instruments to effect a clandestine operation, amending the publics’ opinion in the authority of Scripture, the Creation, and ultimately its Creator as they saw fit.
Together they planned an evil which not one collected generation of human souls could dream of aspiring to or accomplishing on its own. Work of supernatural influence was manifest in their renowned prowess, succeeding at everything the Order of Jesus attempted, by infiltrating all levels of world government and institutions of learning, from the lowest education to the highest form, deceiving even protestant congregations where they could. For the first time in church history it’s leaders, whom Yeshua Hamashiach had once entrusted his keys to, were now under demonic influence.
If the Kabbalists were responsible for originating the globe religion and the big bang which created it, the Jesuits surely had their part in sponsoring and spreading it. Father Andrew Pinsent serves on the Faculty of Theology at Oxford University. He holds advanced degrees in theology from the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome as well as a doctorate in philosophy, and a doctorate in particle physics from Oxford. In 2015 he stated: “Being both a priest and a former particle physicist at CERN, I am often asked to give talks on faith and science. Quite often young people ask me the following question, ‘How can you be a priest and believe in the Big Bang?’ To which I am delighted to respond, ‘We invented it! Or more precisely, Fr Georges Lemaître invented the theory that is today called the ‘Big Bang’ and everyone should know about him.’”
The author of the Big Bang theory was none other than a Jesuit-trained priest, Father Georges Lemaître. After once hearing his presentation on the matter, Einstein famously applauded and said, “This is the most beautiful and satisfactory explanation of creation to which I have ever listened!”
Was it not our very own Jesuit Pope Francis who said, “The Big Bang, that today is considered to be the origin of the world, does not contradict the creative intervention of God; on the contrary, it requires it.”
For a church that wickedly denies the authority of Scripture, placing its trust wholly on priestly institutions, it should turn the head of any God-fearing Christian to learn that the religious Jesuits have produced more star-gazing astronomers than any other group of men. That the Vatican owns and operates NASA’s most powerful telescope in the world, LUCIFER, should keep the God-fearing Christian’s full attention.
Follow from cause to effect: it was the Catholic Church which pushed the agenda of their hesitant cleric to the forefront, thereby dismissing the very Biblical cosmology of a flat, stationary Earth which they had been entrusted with protecting. It was the Catholic Church, undeniably under the guide of the Jesuits, who altered the entire calendar into the Gregorian we honor today, so that we wouldn’t know the times, let alone the true week or day, in which we live. With a globe earth circling the sun now in place, and with billions of other planets equally adhering to distant suns, the path was paved for Darwin and the Big Bang. We are now insignificant to the order of God’s thoughts, as clearly He has business elsewhere to attend to. Indeed, the apostate may attempt to merge the two, evolution with creation—all under the Pope’s orders—but such a thought does not flow from the mind of innocence, nor does it spring from God Almighty, for it does a far superior job of driving men away from Him rather than bringing them into the fold.
It’s ironic really—by adhering to Scripture Alone as their bedrock of authority, and rightly so, the Protestant Reformers seemingly managed to whip the devil into submission, at least by their reckoning. But far from it! Certainly, by her mere association with alchemy and the hidden mystery schools which dominated her worship, the Roman Catholic Church was exposed as an STD to the Gospel—Revelation’s Whore of Babylon—just as the Pope made himself known as the Anti-Christ, to anyone with ears of discretion, who seeks no other purpose but to drive men away from God.
If Pope Francis is claiming that Luther’s Reformation is over, it’s only because he has the inside information which so few of us are willing to take into our own private council. Satan, being not so threatened by the measly whipping of a few, simply turned his tormentors gaze from those lies they found so appalling, seemingly small in retrospect, to a far greater conspiracy in which they could all mutually agree upon—being wholly beautiful to them. The church fled from one City of Destruction into the Metropolis of another.
Listen to me carefully, fellow brother and sister in the faith. We will never—NO NEVER!—escape our adulterous bondage with Mystery Babylon until we cast down every human institution and governing authority, not by physical means but in our own spiritual willpower, which seeks to supplant the Lord’s Testimony concerning Himself and fully conform, to the best of our spiritual know-how and ability, to the simplistic freedoms which we find in Scripture Alone.
“And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon the Great, The Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth.” Revelation 17:5 (KJV)
“Thy Word Is Magnified Above Thy Name” Inerrancy in Error: There’s the KJV and Then, Quite Tragically, There’s the Rest of Them
IT IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD THAT MANY GOOD MEN were either cooked alive or drained of blood in order to get the Greek text known as “Textus Receptus,” or the Received Text—we call it the King James Version in its English equivalent—-into our hands today. Only Martin Luther’s German translation, as well as his English counterpart William Tyndale, along with the 54 scholars who produced the King James Bible based on Tyndale’s work, translated their Bibles from the Textus Receptus. Nobody else, of the hundreds of English translations in existence, have thought to make it worth their while, for you see, the Received Text is not, nor has it ever been, Catholic approved. One might even conclude in light of this that the Great Reformation, culturally speaking, has failed.
The original autographs of the men moved by the Holy Spirit to pen His Word in the years immediately following Yeshua Hamashiach’s resurrection are all gone. No one admittedly has a copy in their possession. There are however over 5,300 extant Greek manuscripts of the New Testament available. The founding Koine Greek gospels and letters, which the Apostles wrote, were copied and recopied again throughout the surmounting centuries in what is referred to as the Byzantine textual tradition, and vastly distributed throughout the world. Today they are collectively called the “Majority Text,” and from what has been gathered, about 95-97% of them textually agree with one another. Indisputably, the best solitary representation of the Byzantine Majority Text, be it a printed one, comes from the Textus Receptus, which is the rewarding result of various Greek Majority Text revisions by a Dutch priest of the Renaissance, Erasmus.
The two primary manuscripts employed for the New International Version (NIV), which envelops almost half of all Bible sales, and every other English version available is the “Codex Sinaiticus” matched with the “Codex Vaticanus” texts. In 1859, the fourth-century Sinaiticus was allegedly discovered by Constantine Tischendorf (1815-1874) in a waste basket at St. Catherine’s Monastery on Mount Saini. Though a protestant, he clothed himself with close and uncomfortably-fitted ties to the Roman Catholic hierarchy, including a recorded private meeting with the Pope. That was his account of it, at least—the texts discovery—being a heroic rescuer of disposed antiquity. The monks however vehemently denied his wastebasket story.
When the true author of Sinaiticus discovered that his manuscript written at Catherine’s was being promoted as a fourth-century discovery, Constantine Simonides (1820-1867) made this discrepancy known. He even challenged Tischendorf to a duel of sorts, a debate actually, where he would demonstrate for the public eye proof that he had indeed authored it, specifically by identifying markings that only its author would authenticate. Tischendorf initially agreed to an appointment, but never showed. While his retreat is easily overlooked and forgiven by academia, to this day it has never been explained.
A Greek Archimandrite named Kallinkos, being a resident of St. Catherine’s, verified that he witnessed firsthand Simonides writing Sinaiticus. He furthermore saw Tischendorf at the Monastery with Simonides’ document, and knew duplicity when he saw it. Kallinkos accused Tischendorf of ill-will, specifically washing Simonides’ handwritten document with lemon juice and herbs to lighten the text and make it appear as though it were of antiquity. Indeed Sinaiticus was mutilated, both in its codex and destruction of some leaves, likely so as to conceal acrostics that would otherwise identify the author of the codex—hence the fabricated wastebasket story. Alterations disfigure every page, systematically defaced by at least ten separate revisers.
The manuscript Vaticanus fairs no better, worse actually—only because it originated in the Vatican library, hence the name. Its true origins, if there is indeed another, are unknown. It should be of interest among my readers to note that Tischendorf held meetings in Rome with the Vatican Librarian, Cardinal Angelo Mai (1782-1854), who wrote an 1838 edition of the Vaticanus. Collaboration, perhaps even conspiracy, seems likely. In the Vaticanus, Christian doctrines are missing like it’s nobody’s business. Genesis 1:1-46:28 is missing, as is Psalms 106-138, Matthew 16:2-3, Romans 16:24, the Pauline Epistles, everything in Hebrews beyond 9:14, and no surprise, considering its parentage, the entire book of Revelation.
The cultural Christian will comfort himself knowing academia praises his acceptance of the Vaticanus and the Sinaiticus. Together they are often referred to by the scholar as the “Critical Text.” This coalition is a scrutinized and wholly-noble attempt, I am told, resulting in the “critical” preservation of the most accurate wording possible, and yet how can this be? Both documents don’t even come close to comparing with the Textus Receptus. Missing from the Vaticanus is at least 2,877 words, with an additional 536 words added and another 953 substituted. It furthermore modifies 1,132 words and transposes 2,098. Sinaiticus is a far worse agitator, with 9,000 divergences from the Received Text.
Indeed, the Received Text, which is supported by the overwhelming collection that makes up the Byzantine Majority Text, holds hands in agreement. Together, the Written Testimony of God is forever preserved. The King James Bible originates from the most-perfect documentation in existence. It is unequivocally strange that the Christian will dismiss any notion of Martin Luther and William Tyndale’s separate German and English translations of Textus Receptus, along with the 54 scholars who produced the KJV, on the basis that it is “cult-like” to declare “King James Only” as one’s slogan when in fact they are, by committing to any other English version in the world, shackling themselves down to the far inferior “Westcott and Hort Alone” principle.
The Westcott-Hort partnership survived 28 years, a result of which established their hotly praised “Critical Text”—replacing the universality of the Byzantine Majority with the locality of an Egyptian wastebasket and the basement of the Vatican—as the standard Greek used for all modern interpretations of the Bible. And yet by their own testimony through a correspondence of letters, which my reader shall be satisfied in knowing can be accessed at least in parts and read-through, the infallibility of Holy Scripture was denied by the both of them. Believing that the ancient philosophers should garnish equal merit with the Prophets and the Apostles, Hort wrote: “For ourselves, we dare not introduce considerations which could not reasonably be applied to other ancient texts, supposing them to have documentary attestation of equal amount, variety and antiquity.” This is an unfortunate truth which agitates our so-called God-fearing modern scholars to no end, who wish to bury any such spiritual criminality between the two, furthermore criticizing anyone who takes issue with their godless indiscretion. But it gets worse.
Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828–1892) not only denied infallibility of Holy Writ, thinking Shakespeare and Plato of equal importance, he shunned any notion of Satan, Hell, and most tragically, Christ’s atonement. By calling the doctrine of the substitutionary atonement “immoral,” Hort sided with the normal doctrine of the High Church Party of the Church of England, which taught salvation by good works, including baptism and church membership.
Hort was a true 19th-century Apostate in that he was a proud first-generation Darwinist. To his longtime friend and correspondence Reverend John Ellerton he confessed Darwin’s Origin of the Species was “the most engaging book” he’d read. “It is a book that one is proud to be contemporary with….” He said, furthermore stating, “….it opens up a new period.”
It should be of no surprise, his love for Darwin, being also a devout Communist. In his letters to Ellerton, he confessed, “I have pretty well made up my mind to devote my three or four years up here to the study of this subject of Communism,” and, “I can only say that it was through the region of pure politics that I myself approach Communism.” As such, his hatred for the United States is legendary, and to such a degree that he hoped for its total destruction during the American Civil War. To Ellerton in 1862, again he wrote: “I care more for England and for Europe than for America, how much more than for all the niggers in the world!”
Brooke Foss Westcott (1825–1901) was a political Socialist, and therefore had similar distastes for Scripture. By his own testimony, infallibility was not considered. Genesis and the six-day creation account it totted was merely an allegory. Jesus committed Himself to nothing resembling a miracle. Even Moses and David were literary characters, and not to be taken historically, as one would expect of a character in a Shakespearean play. Heaven itself was not a physical place, only a state of mind. Evangelical Christians were, according to his own correspondence, dangerous, perverted, unsound, and confused. And considering his admiration and devotion for John Newman, who defected from the Church of England for Roman Catholicism, pulling a great many disciples with him, it should not be a surprise that he worshiped Mary and participated in communion with the dead.
Westcott’s own son writes, “The Communion of Saints seems particularly associated with Peterborough. He had an extraordinary power of realizing this Communion. It was his delight to be alone at night in the great Cathedral, for there he could meditate and pray in full sympathy with all that was good and great in the past. . . There he always had abundant company.”
One night, while returning from his customary meditations in the solitary darkness of the chapel at Auckland castle, his daughter asked him, “I expect you do not feel alone?”
“Oh, no,” he said, “It is full.”
Despite these unfortunate blemishes, and that’s putting it kindly, our so-called Godly scholars who adhere to the principle of “Hort and Westcott Alone,” not “Majority or Received Texts Alone,” will aptly argue that both men’s youthful participation as members in “The Ghostly Guild,” which sought to gather information and knowledge for contacting spirits, is of no consequence to their future lives. Westcott was a serial participant in secret societies and occultist clubs well beyond the Ghostly Guild, such as the Eranus Club, which included Arthur Balfour, the future prime minister of England, who was renowned for his séances and practice of spiritualism. Westcott even founded “Hermes.” Luciferian H.P. Blavatsky said of Hermes that he and Satan were the same. What am I missing here? This information is mocked by our most respected scholarly adherents to “Hort and Westcott Alone,” as if their participation with the occult is only a mere burp or speed bump to the spiritual state of their souls, and yet Westcott admittedly and often—throughout the entirety of his life—found solace by filling his emptied church with the dead, so that he alone might commune with them.
Included in the Westcott-Hort “Critical Text” assembly line was Dr. G. Vance, a Unitarian who denied Christ’s deity, Holy Scripture, and the very God-head which the entire Bible is based upon. Even the Jesuits had their part to play in it. Roman Catholic Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini served as their editor. He believed in the enlightened divinity of humanity. These are the men who were entrusted with the Bible, and whom our pastors and church leaders demand that we continue placing our faith in. Together this all-star ensemble interpreted the corrupted Vatican and Egyptian wastebasket texts using a free-form translation method known as “dynamic equivalence.” Consider that the NIV has 64,098 fewer words than the KJV, a natural out-flowing considering they each derive from very different sources, and then recall how every Word of God is important, not just a selection of them which the Holy Roman Church might grudgingly agree upon.
“I will worship toward Thy holy temple, and praise Thy Name for Thy loving-kindness and for Thy truth: for Thou hast magnified Thy Word above all Thy Name.” Psalm 138:2
Not only is God’s Word important, according to Psalm 138:2, the truth of His Testimony is even magnified above His Holy Name.
When our Protestant Reformers cried, “Sola Scriptura!” resulting in a bloody body count of martyrdom which will in this life never be fully known, they weren’t simply giving us the option of succumbing to corrupted texts out of some malnourished need for Roman approval. For centuries the King James Bible alone was the Bible of Presbyterians, the Congregationalists, and the Quakers. It was the exclusive Bible of the Puritans and the Baptists. In England, Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, it was the Bible of the Evangelicals, and across the Ocean, where the Pilgrims fled in hopes of worshiping God without the continual disruption of Rome; it too was the recognized Bible of the New World. It has produced more fruit and more revivals and preserved the salvation of more souls than any other translation in the history of the world.
It could be said that for almost three-hundred years, until a “wastebasket discovery” and the ghostly Westcott-Hort partnership, all God-fearing men and women were “King James Only” people. Through them and their efforts alone has the Word of God been preserved, even magnified above His Name in the desire to faithfully keep to it. And if these facts were dispensed by our current church leadership to the congregation in which they weekly campaign to shepherd, such identification would undoubtedly ring true by anyone who loves the Lord today.
“Ye Shall Not Add nor Take Away….” Oral Tradition Inserted into the Written Word is Rebellion against the LORD
THE JEW HOLDS NOT TO THE TORAH, as some of us have been led to believe, but to the Kabbalah and the Talmud. It is said that Moses, descending from the Mountain, wrote down the Torah but presented the Talmud in oral form, which was faithfully passed down to each generation in succession—until it was, of course, finally put to print. Where conflict arises with the Torah, oral traditions often if not always take precedence.
“Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.” Colossians 2:8 (KJV)
Perhaps Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, author of “The Wisdom of the Talmud,” correctly addressed this conflict when he said, “Much of what exists in Judaism is absent in the Bible, and much of what is in the Bible cannot be found in Judaism….”
The Christian should pay attention, if such realization has yet to occur to him. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible, nor has it ever been since before Yeshua Hamashiach walked the Earth.
Yeshua Hamashiach condemned such oral nonsense when he spoke, “Making the Word of God of none effect through your tradition….” (Mark 7:13). Perhaps we must conclude that Yeshua, as a standing first-century Jewish Rabbi, missed out on the higher education, because He only seemed to study the written tradition afforded to Him by His Father as opposed to the academic oral, and clearly had Deuteronomy 4:2 in mind. “Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you.”
Hundreds of years ago, relying on ancient Jewish teachings, the kabbalists described what modern physicists are discovering and describing today. How do two theories that seem so far apart come together? They both start from the same observation—Jewish mysticism.
Long before Charles Darwin, 13th century Rabbi Isaac ben Samuel of Acre made this following insight. Since Sabbatical cycles existed before man was created, time before Adam and Eve must be measured in divine years. Rabbi Isaac of Akko, who held that we are in the seventh Sabbatical cycle, concluded our Universe to be 15 billion years old.
The Higgs Boson “God particle,” which CERN discovered in 2012, needs only trace its origins back to kabbalist Moshe ben Nachman, known as Nachmanides or Ramban (1194-1270), and Isaac Luria (1534-72). Ramban, who refers to his discoveries as coming from “hidden knowledge,” expressed the kabbalist view that the universe at its creation was immaterial and not bigger than a mustard seed, while “Divine Rabbi Luria,” who remains this day undisputedly the greatest kabbalist in history, expounded on the Universe’s origins to such a degree that astrophysics owe a great debt of gratitude, mainly because their concept-for-concept theory of the Big Bang is rooted directly through him. Accordingly, ten vessels were originally meant to contain the emanation of God’s light, but were unable to withstand that light and were hence shattered. As a result of this cosmic catastrophe, the Sefirot, the archetypal values through which the cosmos was created, are shattered and out of place; and the world within which we reside is composed of the shards of these broken values.
Though many “Copernican Christians” recognize the obvious and long-standing kabbalist affair with our present science delusion, their wisdom falls short where the globe is concerned—perhaps out of wishful thinking. And yet the two are inseparable. It is all the same delusion. The globe can religiously first be traced to the Babylonian Talmud. While the early Christian congregation adhered to the teachings of Moses and the Prophets, Jews were prohibited from having images, if indeed that image “is holding an orb,” because it would imply that the idol “grasps the whole world as if it were a globe.”
It is in the Zohar in which we read: “….all the world rolls in a circle like a ball, these down and these up, and all the creatures in six lands (our continents) are different in their appearances in accordance with the differences of air in each place…..Therefore there are places in the world that when it is light for those on one side of the sphere it dark for those on the other side of the sphere, for these it is day while for those it is night; and there is a place in the world where it is always day and there is no night, except for a few moments.” (Zohar vol.3, on the portion of Vayikra, fol. 9b-10a)
The Jerusalem Talmud, or Talmud Yerushalmi, Avoda Zara 3:1, states: “R’ Yonah said: When Alexander the Macedonian wanted to go back, he flew [on the back of an eagle] higher and higher until he saw the earth as a ball and the sea as a plate.”
Yeshua Hamashiach wisely advised His disciples, “Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees,” (Matthew 16:6). We are further told that His disciples “reasoned among themselves, saying, ‘It is because we have taken no bread.’” Perhaps our present congregation is also confused as to the meaning of this passage, because though bread we may lack (or have plenty of), oral tradition and the wisdom of the Greeks have infiltrated the church to such a degree that our entire belief in the created order has capsized.
Just look what has happened to the world and our church and the apostasy of so many who have turned from it and then consider Galatians 5:9. “A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.” These are not idle words. Bread we may or may not be in need of. We are certainly however in desperate need of another reformation. The man who holds Scientism higher than the pages of God’s Testimony will surely find—if he is indeed an honest soul—willfully choosing to continue in his practices; that just as the wheat is to be separated from the chaff, he too, wherever the reformer can be found, will not want a part in it. He, the unbeliever, will take his part with the chaff.
“A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.” Galatians 5:9 (KJV)
“A Doctrine of Demons”—Johannes Kepler’s Journey to the Dark Side of the Moon
AT THE TURN OF THE 17TH CENTURY THE REFORMATION was still waging its theological war over the will of the humanist mind in every corner of Europe, and Johannes Kepler, a German mathematician, astronomer, astrologer, and alchemist, chose his side. He aligned himself with what he aptly christened ‘New Astronomy.’ It was a position that openly opposed the firm foundation by which men like Calvin and Luther and anyone else who proclaimed the principles of Scripture Alone stood upon. Kepler was no stranger to theology either. Both sides of the feud held hands with Biblical doctrine, or in the very least some form of it, selectively. And yet Kepler, along with his contemporaries, believed God had created the world according to an intelligible plan which could not be accessed through a reading of His Word, but only through the natural light of human reason.
Kepler described his Copernican-based ‘New Astronomy’ as “celestial physics,” being “an excursion into Aristotle’s Metaphysics,” and “a supplement to Aristotle’s On the Heavens.” The recovery of Aristotle into Latin texts from its Greek and Arabic counterparts no doubt fueled the Big Bang explosion of apostasy and humanism in the Enlightenment church, despite the reformers best efforts, and is conclusively a radical departure from the teachings of early Christianity. It is somewhat strange that the first serious treatise on lunar astronomy, as told in Kepler’s 1608 novel Somnium (Latin for “The Dream”), and only published by his son after his death, also happened to be what Carl Sagan referred to as the first real work of science-fiction. Then again, the truth is stranger than fiction. Somnium gives dark insight inside the mind of a man who gifted the world with “Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion,” works which would later provide one of the foundations for Isaac Newton’s theory of universal gravitation. In short, according to Kepler’s novel (strange ruminations for a recognized figure of science), knowledge of the Universe, particularly its scope and motion, came not to us from the observant eye of an astronomer pressed firmly against his telescope, but through communion with demons.
The story, which centers around Kepler’s own dream about himself reading a book, involves Duracotus, a 14 year-old Icelandic boy with a witch for a mother, who makes a living selling bags of herbs and cloth with strange markings on them. This, after Kepler first reads from another book about Libussa, a historical sorceress and prophetess in her own time, before falling asleep—and who may have evoked the story within the dream. On a side note, her habit of summoning demons—the boy’s mother, that is—comes well rewarded. She has learned all she knows about astronomy from them, even knowledge concerning great unobservant distances. It is the demons, we come to learn, who not only help their human counterparts travel around the world, but through their own technological sorcery, to the moon and back. I’m looking at you, Apollo.
The moon is of particular interest to the boy and his mother. So upon summoning her favorite demon, they are told in elaborate detail about it. Levania is its demon-given name, and is referred to as an island in the Aether. Levania is divided into two hemispheres, Privolva and Subvolva. Privolva, being the dark side of the moon, never has visual contact with the Earth, but planets appear bigger. The residents of Subvolva on the other hand, oddly mirroring Einstein’s own up-and-coming theory of relativity, can observe the rotation of Earth without ever feeling any movement themselves.
As it turns out, there’s a pathway between Levania and the Earth which, when opened, some humans are said to have traveled, so long as the demons are there to escort them. The journey, spanning fifty-thousand miles and taking as little as four hours, is such a shock to a person’s fragile physicality, especially when the Aether and extreme temperatures are taken into consideration, that the demons sedate their mortal travelers and expose them to the wealth of their own devilish sorcery, much as aliens might their abductee, even propelling them notably forward with magnificent force, all in order to sustain human life and overcome the otherwise impossible hurdles of lunar travel.
Perhaps the most menacing presence among Somnium’s many celestial inhabitants is in the specifics of the narrative itself, some of them being awkwardly true details concerning Kepler’s scientific theories, all of which also seem to invoke a biographical recollection of his own life. For example, Kepler and the boy share the same mentor, Tycho Brahe. He and the boy also share the same mother. And when the dream is cut short, we should not be surprised to read of a spiritual confession. Kepler wakes with his head covered, and he is wrapped in blankets just like the character in his story.
This is precisely what Luther and Calvin, alongside their reformer contemporaries, were fighting against. They called the Copernicans out, and as history has proven, very few listened! They clearly understood the Apostle Paul’s warning that “a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump (Galatians 5:9), and also to young Timothy when he spake, “Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils (1 Timothy 4:1).”
There is not a modern Christian astronomer alive who would in his right mind disagree with this—giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils, that is—and yet it is difficult, if not entirely impossible, to discern the doctrine of demons from truth when the natural light of human reason has pushed the Infallibility of Scripture from the forefront of his mind.
“E-MC2” or Masters of the Universe: Mathematics in the Minds of Maniacs
R.I.P. Biblical FLAT EARTH
Creation Week – 1915
THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY THOROUGHLY SUCCEEDED in holding a gun to Stationary Earth’s head and pulling the trigger.
Einstein’s theory, which I shan’t here pretend to understand—nor do I even care to—has the most brilliant of modern physicists throwing up their hands in confusion in order to blindly follow the script, for it allows no exceptions. Still, an entire century later nobody truly understands it. And yet relativity is a necessary component of globular Earth. Without the chalk board, true science, such as the Michelson-Morley experiment, among dozens of others, rings undeniably true. Relativity wasn’t only the weapon which sent Stationary Earth to the coffin; it was the last nail, as it was also the first nail and every single nail in-between. Knowing this, one can begin to understand the world-wide festivities. Even in the pews of the church, it seems, there was cause for celebration. Those pesky Flat Earth prophets, you see, would not—no, they most certainly could not—bother them again. With one fail swoop, God’s Biblical creation was finally dead and buried, or so they thought.
“If the facts don’t fit the theory, change the facts” —Albert Einstein.
If anybody truly understood relativity, it was Professor Herbert Dingle. From the very decade of its conception Dingle was the premiere expert on Einstein’s theory, and as his staunchest apologist, he labored tirelessly to explain it. In fact, the entire world conferred to his knowledge. So renowned was his expertise that when Einstein died in 1955 the BBC had him broadcast his tribute. He wrote multiple books on the subject, starting in 1922 with his publication of “Relativity for All,” and then its follow-up two-decades later, “The Special Theory of Relativity.” As such, he was conferred by scientists all over the world, and in 1959, after successfully promoting the theory for decades, Dingle found a slight problem. Perhaps slight isn’t the best word. It was a paradox, actually—one in which he devoted an additional 13 years of his life attempting to solve, even employing his spreadsheet of colleagues to back him. But none was ever found.
When he attempted to go forward with his findings, being an honest man, and finally recognizing the taste of a baloney sandwich when he chewed on it, Dingle was blocked all access by science journals. Without the help of the Scientism Establishment which once supported him, he had no choice but to go at it alone.
I am content knowing Dingle’s book, “Science at the Crossroads,” published in 1972, is readily available for my reader, and may therefore be dissected at length. Much of what I have to say here is paraphrased only as a result of Mr. Dingle’s own wealth of knowledge. In it he shall surely find that the premier expert on Einstein’s theory of relativity has one somber truth to prove.
Albert Einstein is a fraud.
Einstein’s theory of relativity is held to be true, not because it is true, but because mathematical formulae is devised and held up as a silhouette of truth. The good in a mathematical formula is to prove that it is somehow real in hopes that it corresponds beyond the imaginary, thereby marrying itself to the natural world it attempts to prop up. Mathematical symbols may correspond with that which is observable. Then again, they may only prove the formula-makers rich imagination. Math symbolizes truth in the hand of its masters, and when amplified it is given the ringing endorsement of symbolized truth despite the impossibility of such an equation evolving life and walking off the chalkboard. Such a stroke of genius is only a “great discovery” to the man who is too afraid to sound stupid by questioning it. If there we start with the mathematical, in the realm of imagination that is, then the master of that equation, who presses us to confide in his artistry, is no different than a chronic liar who believes the world around him will blindly give allowance to his perversions.
Perhaps the most brilliant scientist of the 20th century was non-other than Nikola Tesla, who’s findings and discoveries were apparently so temperamental to the truth of the world we live in that the FBI, at the request of the U.S. War Department, seized his research papers and made it top secret upon his death in 1943. It was Tesla who said of his contemporaries, “Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.”
Similarly, Professor Herbert Dingle had this to say, not only of mathematics as a whole, but the very theory which he once upheld as the supreme truth: “In the language of mathematics we can tell lies as well as truths, and within the scope of mathematics itself there is no possible way of telling one from the other.”
The only way to know if a mathematical formula holds any merit to truth is to test it beyond “thought experiments,” specifically in the wild, where there is ether. I bring up ether because relativity’s sole purpose is to disregard the Michelson-Morley experiment, which proved that the sun is moving, not the Earth. As Einstein would say, “Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.” With mathematical formulae, the religion of Globe Earth finally has a “science” to back it.
This is what Einstein asks of us, to ignore measured reality where God’s creation declares itself—that the Earth is in fact flat and stationary—and in its place prop up the existence of the globe religion with the masterful stroke of a mathematician’s brush. That moon Martians should believe their world is stationary, with the Earth and the sun revolving around them, is what we are expected to believe of relativity. That the track is moving and not the train is also to be believed. That the sidewalk rises to slap us in the face rather than we falling down to meet it is also a possibility we must put our faith in, if relativity is true and the Earth is a globe. This is the superstitious religion which all Copernicans must adhere to, that motion is all relative to the reference of the observer. True science proves otherwise.
Anyone who’s thoroughly read the Bible and therefore subjects himself to it will rightfully conclude that Albert Einstein is a relativist (as the theory dutifully implies), while God, according to His own Testimony, is not. And yet virtually no one who is taught relativity, even from an intellectual distance, and therefore adheres to the theory of relativity, continues to believe the Bible.
In his own words, Einstein had this to say of his life’s work: “What we mean by relative motion in a general sense is perfectly plain to everyone. If we think of a wagon moving along a street we know that it is possible to peak of the wagon at rest, and the street in motion, just as well as it is to speak of the wagon in motion and the street at rest. That, however, is a very special part of the ideas involved in the principle of Relativity.”
This is likely why, when one looks up inspirational quotes on imagination, Einstein is regularly regurgitated as the crowning achievement of them. Quotes such as, “The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination,” come to mind, and, “Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.” Einstein was a true magician of the imagination, using equations as his wand, but a scientist he was not.
Yet the religion of Scientism and its worldwide assembly of worshipers willingly lap up the stench of relativism, every bit of it. If TIME Magazine would name Einstein “Person of the Century” in its December 31, 1999 issue—I remember it well, having just turned 19 three days earlier—-it shows how serious the issue of Globe Earth truly is, particularly among those who desperately need the lie upheld.
In that issue, Frederic Golden said, “He was the embodiment of pure intellect…he was unfathomably profound—the genius among geniuses who discovered, merely by thinking about it, that the universe was not as it seemed….his ideas, like Darwin’s, reverberated beyond science, influencing modern culture.”
When it comes to supporting the globe with science, true science, and not merely the chalk board equations which seek to prove it, we can all learn from Albert Einstein when he said, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
Science, Pseudoscience, & the Antichrist Spirit—Carl Sagan’s Personal Voyage
CARL SAGAN IS METICULOUSLY SELECTIVE IN HIS CHOICE WORDING when he says, “Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking.” Such an assumption is not only regarded as favorable by his contemporaries, they also concur when Sagan assures us that most individuals have “heard virtually nothing of modern science.” Much of mankind has “had a natural appetite for the wonders of the Universe. He wanted to know about science. It’s just that all the science had gotten filtered out before it reached him.” What mankind is left with—or rather, where he often begins and therefore ends, is with a set of superstitious beliefs which Sagan only seems to sigh regretfully when referring to. If it isn’t Science, it’s relegated to the compost pile of pseudoscience. Science, the institution of Science, cannot be built upon it.
In his 1995 book, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, Sagan says, “Pseudoscience is embraced, it might be argued, in exact proportion as real science is misunderstood—except that the language breaks down here. If you’ve never heard of science (to say nothing of how it works), you can hardly be aware you’re embracing pseudoscience. You’re simply thinking in one of the ways that humans always have. Religions are often the state-protected nurseries of pseudoscience—although there’s no reason why religions have to play that role.”
I can’t help but wonder what Sagan ultimately implies when he holds a promised dining reservation for the religious fellow at the table of Scientism, should he strictly adhere to its guidelines—or specifically, way of thinking, because the naughty-no-no list of pseudoscience is quite extensive. The very inclusion of angels, demons, prayer, prophecy, miracles, healing, creationism, and particularly in my case, FLAT EARTH, on that list disqualifies any participation in the Scientific Method by true Christianity. Even with the fat removed, one might argue, the atoning sacrifice, resurrection of Christ, and His ascension to heaven is bare bones Christianity. Without these historical events, we have no hope. For the scientific mind, these truths must be cast down in order to pursue a man-made standard of humanism which is “…based on experiment, on a willingness to challenge old dogma, on an openness to see the universe as it really is.”
If the Christian finds his identity among such phrases as, “In the beginning, God”—if he focuses the vision of his faith upon a God enthroned above the firmament (Ezekiel 1:26), one who has set His very thoughts and even His physical positioning so specifically upon us—we who are dwelling within the confines of His created order—that He employs the Earth alone as a footstool (Isaiah 66:1), then he would be hard pressed to engage with any counter-system of logic which would lean upon, and ultimately lead to, the institutions natural conclusions. Such obvious end-roads are presented when Sagan proudly lifts the dogmatic banner of Scientism and proclaims: “Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people.”
I am regularly accused by so-called Christians, almost always with their nostrils raised, that I am being “unscientific” in my beliefs, and therefore an embarrassment to their cause—as if my feelings are somehow supposed to be hurt by all the sticks and stones which academia can throw at me. Contrarily, they are accusations which suite me well. I always smile with a bit of relief and thank them for the observation, for they are indeed correct when acknowledging Science opposes the Bible at every perceivable twist and turn. A faithful adherent to the testimonies of Holy Scripture can at best by definition set his aspirations upon the practice of pseudoscience. By forcefully raping Holy Scripture with the STD’s of humanism, the Copernican and the Darwinist, both of whom infiltrate almost every conceivable rank and position of our church, uphold the only conflicting beliefs which are, by no mere coincidence, accepted by the halls of Scientism.
Sagan gleefully sweeps the three-fold horizons of the Darwinist, atheist, and Copernican when he dialogues as the spokesman for each of them. “To discover that the Universe is some 8 to 15 billion and not 6 to 12 thousand years old improves our appreciation of its sweep and grandeur; to entertain the notion that we are a particularly complex arrangement of atoms, and not some breath of divinity, at the very least enhances our respect for atoms; to discover, as now seems probable, that our planet is one of billions of other worlds in the Milky Way galaxy and that our galaxy is one of billions more, majestically expands the arena of what is possible; to find that our ancestors were also the ancestors of apes ties us to the rest of life and makes possible important—if occasionally rueful—reflections on human nature.”
Had Yeshua Hamashiach been a scientist rather than a carpenter, He would most certainly be a man of pseudoscience. Because He first and foremost upheld the written Words of Moses, psalmists, scribes and Prophets—being not of this world—He brought with Him a collection of beliefs or practices which “one might mistakenly regard as being based on scientific method.” As Sagan emphasizes by his own admission, Science takes the Lord’s place, “Because science carries us toward an understanding of how the world is, rather than how we would wish it to be, its findings may not in all cases be immediately comprehensible or satisfying.”
Rarely is a finger lifted by the Christian—if ever, which would dare investigate the claims of Science should it threaten or give the slightest hint as one containing the spirit of antichrist and which, as the Apostle John warned, “whereof ye have heard that is should come; and even now already is it in the world (1 John 4:3).” The Christian should understand and acknowledge that God alone is his source of knowledge. He, the Christian, first believes in God in order to define his own existence. From there and only in this plotted position can truth illuminate his method of thinking. He is to be a temple, an empty vessel always and only in need of God for filling. If the Christian and Sagan’s Science are to mutually agree, he must turn away from God’s Testimony and seek a counter-way of thinking, which will no doubt in turn fill him with counter-knowledge. The road to science, no matter how much the Christian flails his hands like a chicken attempting flight and demands it so, does not lead its faithful adherer back to God, so long as the Bible’s many declarations found in pseudoscience are stripped from him, and never will.
Actually, if Science has done its work on the soul, it will turn him into such a humanist that “absolute-certainty,” except the darkened perversities which he can accept and imagine in his own sinful mind, will be altogether dropped and abandoned from his own methodical approach. Again, Sagan declares, “Humans may crave absolute certainty; they may aspire to it; they may pretend, as partisans of certain religions do, to have attained it. But the history of science—by far the most successful claim to knowledge accessible to humans—teaches that the most we can hope for is successive improvement in our understanding, learning from our mistakes, an asymptotic approach to the Universe, but with the proviso that absolute certainty will always elude us.”
Sagan no doubt speaks for the religion of Mystery Babylon. He has dutifully filled himself with the spirit of antichrist—as has any Christian who upholds Science over the truth of Scripture; though at least Sagan is rigidly honest about it—when he critiques the fulfillment of past, present, and future Biblical prophecy. “Yet has there ever been a religion with the prophetic accuracy and reliability of science? There isn’t a religion on the planet that doesn’t long for a comparable ability—precise, and repeatedly demonstrated before committed skeptics—to foretell future events. No other human institution comes close.”
“The fact that so little of the findings of modern science,” Sagan concludes, “is prefigured in Scripture to my mind casts further doubt on its divine inspiration.”
Though Sagan, I can only imagine, being true to his own man-made religious worldviews—holding a total lack of certainty in all things—likely smirks as he adds, “But of course I might be wrong.”
The Third Reich, the USSR, & Now the USA—A Modern Case of Historical Negationism
“IT IS THE ABSOLUTE RIGHT OF THE STATE to supervise the formation of public opinion.” Josef Goebbels words, not mine. Goebbels was Adolf Hitler’s Reich Minister of Propaganda, serving his office faithfully from 1933 until 1945, when several conflicting accounts accredit his final undoing to any number of possible murder and assisted suicide scenarios. At any rate, most patriotic Americans will readily admit, when faced with the reality of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, the rewriting of history literally became institutionalized during the 20th century. It is a feat not entirely impossible, given absolute control over the media to overwrite the memories of hundreds of millions of people. All one needs is the collaborative efforts of the few powerful and a single generation to accomplish it in. History has proven this much. Almost always such malicious tampering is done to secure the monopolized hold which the conglomerate of power has over the very people they vow to shepherd. And yet in light of this, the average American will faint with horror, oh the horror, at the mere suggestion—the audacity—that anyone would dare suggest our world governing Empire has in any way supervised or shaped our own understanding of history.
Soon after Stalin achieved power, rival Leon Trotsky, founder of the Red Army and a monumental force behind the Bolshevik Revolution, simply disappeared from the public eye. He was of course assassinated with an ice ax to the brain, but with his political removal, so too was every portrait that had once hung in public squares and private households stripped from public consciousness. For the everyday Labour Party Soviet, Stalin and Lenin were inserted into the very role which Trotsky had once held, standing together as the imperial leaders of the Bolshevik. History was re-written, and every media outlet east of Berlin—from museums and building-sized posters to postage stamps—had a part to play in it.
While younger generations of Soviets believed this illegitimate distortion of the historical records was a true linear portrayal of political events, and likely saw no reason to question it; older generations, who had once personally familiarized themselves with the works and portraits of Trotsky in real time, perhaps rationalizing it all as but a dream in the face of relentless indoctrination, notably struggled with false-memory syndromes.
George Orwell took notice. Said Orwell, “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.” In his dystopian novel “Nineteen Eighty-Four,” such a condition: knowing what is otherwise true and yet cognitively finding no contradiction in simultaneously believing what the Establishment demands is true, is called doublethink. In “Nineteen Eighty-Four,” doublethink is a central contributor of Big Brother’s formal brainwashing programs. People voluntarily learn doublethink due to peer pressure, mainly the desire to fit in, thereby gaining status within the Party. Anyone who recognizes, let alone mentions, any contradiction within the Party’s policy is deemed a “blasphemer.” He will likely receive harsh disciplinary action and immediate disownership from patriotic party members.
Doublethink is the cognitive language of the modern Christian. By no mere coincidence, it is Big Brother approved. My serial reader will immediately note that I am not so concerned with the unbelieving. Flat Earth is not for everyone—clearly. My issue is with the true believer. Doublethink is his intellectual language too, and he—the Christian, once being presented with such Biblical facts that he has likely grown intimately knowledgeable of on his own—is without excuse.
By its very definition, doublethink demands that such an adherer holds two conflicting views at the same time. Because its subscriber is plagued with a total lack of cognitive dissonance, he is completely suspended with disbelief when he is faced with his own contradiction. While claiming Infallibility of the Word—if indeed he is a Christian—he also simultaneously believes what the Copernican astronomer says of truth, despite the Bible’s claim to the contrary—that God’s creation is immovable and stationary. If he remains completely untroubled by the contradiction, it’s because doublethink can only thrive in a society that is Big Brother approved. Globe Earth is Big Brother approved. The Christian who snubs God’s Testimony expresses his contrary opinion precisely with the rank and file which Academia and Scientism requires that he falls in line with.
I am simply perplexed by the sheer overwhelming number of Americans who truly believe the rewriting of history, or historical negationism, would not—No, it simply could not happen to them. And yet it clearly has. It’s happened to all of us. The American Government gave us something the Soviets could only wish to invent in their grandest of wet dreams—the television. It is predictably in every household across our nation, and likely all of western civilization, if not the world. And it is owned—the media, that is—maintained, and produced from its very ground-floor conceptions, even in its most imaginative Hollywood grandeur, from a stunning conglomerate of six corporations, every single one of them Zionist run. Collectively, they can dictate whatever narrative they want.
It was the Jew, my serial reader will likely recall, who first took the surgical knife to the Torah in favor of his Kabbalistic texts and the Babylonian Talmud, pronouncing God’s flat stationary Earth to be a spinning globular one—always spinning. At any rate, parents have lost their authority. They’ve handed the raising of their children over to the government. It’s a terrifying thought. When did we as a society mutually agree upon this? I can’t even stomach plopping my children down in front of the Public Broadcasting Service anymore. PBS produces shows where, for an entire thirty minutes, children can stare at cartoon images of the globe—never a single real image, mind you—and for no other purpose but to let Carl Sagan’s words ring true: “Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people.”
Today, doublethink surrounds us. A Christian reads of a stationary Earth in Holy Writ and likely never stops to contemplate why the only commentary that can be found which might otherwise grant geocentricism the courtesy of a passing nod regards a heliocentric globe. And while the ink-stains of historical negationism have been finely dried in every mainstream and government endorsed publication for two or three generations now, real history is still available to the student who wishes for nothing less than truth over the writing of fiction—meaning, not every book on the matter has been cooked.
I look to our so-called Christian astronomers—men like Danny Faulkner—who aspire to scrub true history from the minds of every believer by openly campaigning on the platform that 19th century atheists invented the Flat Earth domed-cosmology model as a way to make mockery of the Bible. Since when have astronomers usurped theologians, anyhow? Naturally, according to Faulkner, we few who stand boldly against the entire weight and scorn of academia are the poor ignoramus souls so easily deceived. It is his only position, if he wishes to impose the illusion of truth on the subservient, to scrub and scrub and scrub the floor until the stain of Godly men and women who’ve come long before him are not even dared to be read or mentioned for fear of ridicule. I can’t help but wonder, is someone like Danny Faulkner merely protecting his own career, having been caught picking and choosing what he will take literally of God’s Testimony concerning His creation, or is he a gatekeeper?
Danny Faulkner, great Christian men and women like Samuel Rowbotham confronts you. William Carpenter confronts you. Alexander Gleason and Thomas Winship confront you. David Wardlaw Scott confronts you, as does Lady Blount, F.E. Pasche, Albert Smith, and Gabrielle Henriet. These Godly men and women pleaded with the church not to give in to the Copernican apostasy. Even Martin Luther and John Calvin, Philipp Melanchthon and A.W. Pink—all of whom boldly stood against the Copernican—confront you. Generations of our spiritual forefathers confront you.
History has been re-written. Much like Stalin and Lenin with Trotsky, the modern day Copernican Creationist has overthrown these men. In every public square their portraits are erased. And they would have us think the God-fearing Christian paraded the theory of Copernicus—and the so-called Christian astronomers still to come—as something that finally—Yes, thank the Lord, FINALLY! — made Biblical sense. Yet in 1856 Dr. Valentine Ernest Loescher wrote: “No sooner was the very uncertain doctrine brought up that the sun is at rest and our globe revolves around him, than the contempt of Holy Writ and infidelity notably increased. On the other hand, vanity was rampant, and the desire to accept and circulate absurd opinions.” (His Life, by Engelhardt, 1856, p. 283.)
Danny Faulkner, real history, church history, confronts you.
History Is Written By the Victors, and Ray Bradbury
TO THE VICTOR BELONGS THE EMPTY PAPER AND THE PEN. The author of such a notebook writes not merely in the realm of history, as Winston Churchill once so brazenly yet truthfully proclaimed; he writes future fantasy as well. Yet what might happen if, as a result of our indiscretion—tossing aside the long-standing belief in Biblical cosmology, an act which the writers of history convinced us to commit—just what if our long-promised transcendence into the infinite cosmos simply proved to be another imaginative flight of fancy? According to Ray Bradbury, that writer would fake it, naturally. And what makes a better agent of indoctrination for any governing body than the television.
Such was the case for poor Fiorello Bodoni, small-time junkyard owner, big time dreamer. Star gazing hobbyist mainly, particularly where his admiration for distant planets was concerned. He so desperately wanted to visit them, and so he needed a flying contraption to transport him there. What does such a schemer do? He spends his life-savings on a mock-up rocket rather than contributing to the well-fare of his family. He secretly spends his nights constructing a theater for its interior, complete with color film, mirrors, and screens. And having convinced his children that this is indeed a very real space vehicle capable of transporting them to another planet, they excitedly take part in it, much to their mother’s initial disdain for such an idea. Her opinion changes however once her children return from the deception that carried them across the galaxy and back, what ended up being a two-day journey to nowhere—having never once actually left the ground. It is a deception, Bradbury assures us, in which they will happily “remember for always.”
First published in 1950, Ray Bradbury’s “The Rocket” arrived during the dawn of television, the computer, modern media, the Cold War, United Nations, Rothschild’s Israel, the Antarctica Treaty, and NASA. I was in a library, kind of just meandering around, and looking. You know, seeking my next read. That’s when I first discovered “The Illustrated Man,” the collection of short stories where-in “The Rocket” was first contained; the year Bradbury died—2012, for the record. It was buried in some obscure aisle, a well-preserved first copy—hardbound. I only stumbled upon it having fumbled my scissor-fingers recklessly across the binding of random books until they tripped over the spine which aspired to suite my tastes.
If I fondly recall sliding “The Illustrated Man” out from its contemporaries—specifically now that I inhabit a completely different shape to the Earth—it’s because the thought first occurred to me, after scouring through each and every word which Bradbury thought necessary to clap upon paper, that science and science-fiction are intermingled. There is no severing the two apart. Some will believe a lie by the will of our administrators, if only so that science can be lived out. Ray Bradbury taught me that.
What we are left with, mainly two separate compartments of thought that bleed into one single complex of cabinetry; is satisfactual only to the warped mindset of humanism. The liberal humanist believes in the superiority of his own agency over the acceptance of dogma or creed, and so sees little reason why he cannot pick apart and choose truth to his own fancy.
A Christian humanist, as if the two titles should or can in any way go together, will similarly give praise to the independent intellect. He will gladly advertise his distant cerebral gazes as something in which God prefers of His children rather than easily admit to the reality of his sinful nature and the imaginative perversions which derives from free-ranging logic. Suddenly I am expected to believe with every so-called Christian humanist that I meet: imagination is innocent—no, virtuous, if they’re being honest—in its transcendent desire to reach for the stars, metaphysically speaking. He believes the Holy Spirit supports his cognitive decisions, weighing truth and lies at the expense of traditional doctrine, which he has willingly tossed to the side of the road so as not to have his intelligence bogged down by it.
Science-fiction is indeed a messy business. We are saturated with its religious message of transcendence at every turn of the day. Wishful thinking, I call it. In Bradbury’s case, we’ll label it a Freudian slip of the pen. If such a spiritual principle is unachievable, physically speaking (it most certainly is unachievable; the Bible taught me that), then our administrators will go about controlling our destinies in a slightly different achievable way. If the rocket itself is a worthless heap of bolts then they shall easily enough employ its scraps. They will convince us of its good use through the manipulation of a free-ranging mind, and worse, they’ll make us think, like any thoughtful session with a psychologist, that it was our idea to go along with it in the first place.
“What the space age was seeking all along was not so much an expansion of physical space as an expansion of the mind” – Marina Benjamin
The Truest Statement NASA Ever Made Was a Deathbed Confession
MY PERSONAL CONDOLENCES GO OUT TO THE SORRY JANITOR who is apparently responsible for throwing the only existing NASA blueprints of the entire Apollo space program into the trashcan. You know what they say, “Don’t put all your eggs into one basket.”
Veteran NASA astronaut and provocateur Don Pettit only recently admitted what we believers of the Bible’s full unbroken Revelation already knows—that the US Government couldn’t return to the moon even if they wanted to. “I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond,” said Pettit, “The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again.”
Say that again—we’ve regressed in technology since 1969?
I think what Pettit meant to say was, “We couldn’t fake another moon landing if we wanted to.” There are simply too many “space critics” in on the movie-making process. But no matter how much they make attempts at it, telling the truth that is—and believe me, Pettit has come too close for comfort on a number of occasions—NASA can’t seem to fess up, aside from the random grease off the brain. Telling lies, even professional ones, is a slippery business.
Apparently, NASA Control in Houston hasn’t heard the joyous news. That tin can in which they slingshot those three Masonic boys some fifty years ago through the Van Allen belt is retrieved from televised obscurity and currently hangs on display at the Smithsonian Institute in Washington. The Apollo 11 Command Module Columbia, I believe it’s called. NASA, would you like me to call them up, set an appointment to take a looksy-loo, have your space engineers see how our granddaddy’s built it?
On a side note, I would like to ask Pettit if the janitor who threw out the Apollo program blueprints is the same sad individual who recorded over the original moon landing footage, which NASA confesses no longer exists. President Richard M. Nixon, once remarking, “The American people don’t believe anything until they see it on television,” similarly called the televised moon landing hoax, “the greatest week in the history of the world since the Creation.” It’s a darn shame how that original footage simply disappeared. It probably had something to do with all those “space critics” who know a thing or two about the movie-making business. I hope it was worth it, recording the Super Bowl half-time show over the most important documentation in the history of the world. Washington, you’d better not loan NASA the Declaration of Independence. They’ll likely use it as a dinner napkin.
Astro-not Don Pettit adds, “The only limit to human future is in our own imaginations.”
See, another attempt at honesty. If trips to Disney World have taught me anything, it’s that imagination is a powerful thing—so powerful in fact, NASA has the capabilities to land on, say—Mars, as in the Mars Rover. They also apparently have their imaginations fixed on the moon Europa, now that they’ve penetrated the rings of Saturn. And let’s not overlook the fact that only recently they announced their latest mission—to the sun. Yes, the sun. 95 million miles away, is it? And we’re sending a probe there. But the moon, we’ve simply lost the technology.
Wernher von Braun wasn’t only a rocket engineer under the pay of Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany; he later became the father of “space science” in the United States, being accredited for developing the Saturn V. But his was another time, when NASA was more “advanced” in their technological know-how. And when it comes to honesty, since we’re on the subject, there’s nothing so grand as a deathbed confession. Only his is engraved in stone—a tombstone, to be exact.
If it agrees with what we who faithfully subscribe to the full unbroken Revelation of God believes—we call this the doctrine of Flat Earth—it’s because his confesses what God Himself has testified to be true. And nobody, not even NASA, will alter that reality—aside from the whimsical world of television, that is.
And it reads:
“The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.” Psalm 19:1
WOW, The Special Effects In Space Are Getting Amazing! Who Needs Claymation?
A GOOD STORY LINE IS ALL I’M EVER REALLY AFTER. You know, character development, drama, a splice of romance thrown in just to raise the stakes. Special effects don’t matter much to me—they actually tend to get in the way of meaty dialogue. And yet that’s what we seem to get in a movie nowadays, all effects, no plot. Take a recent live feed from the European Space Agency in the ISS, when the film crew decided to impossibly beam a stuffed anime-character or fuzzy alien, whatever it was supposed to be—teddy bear in space, I guess—into the hands of an astronaut, as if this were an episode of Star Trek or something. You do realize we have yet to “invent” the know-how to beam teddy bears into space, right? Oh, I know, that sort of space fiction wows the young folks, but where’s the substance? When it came to the Apollo missions, NASA really knew how to reel the emotions in. But that was fifty years ago! So when viewing reruns of the classics, I don’t really care about special effects—I can easily look past all the technical glitches of old—if the story is good.
If you’re a fan of NASA, particularly the vintage Cold War stuff, then you likely know what I’m talking about. Satellites dangling visibly on strings, stage crews accidentally showing up behind their toy rocket models and in the background of “outer space” no less, conflicting shadows originating from multiple “cosmic” light sources, electric-lit Earth globes with odd-shaped continents and clouds painted on by the prop man, which looks nothing like the globes they show today both in size and character—not overlooking bubbles rising from astronaut during “space walks,” that sort of thing. Once in a while I might even catch a scuba-diver scrambling by, desperately swimming to clear the shot after a stage-hand yells, “Action!” But it’s to be expected in any Hollywood film of old, the stage crew sometimes shows up in a scene by accident. Besides, those astronauts preform all of their own stunts. They need lifeguards standing by, because nobody wants to see a good astronaut drown.
One of my favorite NASA movies is highly underrated, and apparently rarely watched. It’s from the 1965 Gemini 4 mission, and involves this tense scene where co-pilot Ed White becomes a figure of Claymation in order to preform history’s first-ever spacewalk. I especially love the part where he impossibly turns his helmet (we all realize they’re locked on air-tight, right?) just to salute his “fourth-wall” and the viewing audience behind it.
See, that’s just the thing about the 1960’s. They appreciated good Claymation when they saw it on television. You know, Claymation—as in Gumby, or Christmas specials like Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. Perhaps American audiences were simply filled with more imagination back then. And there was a Cold War to win. It wasn’t exactly a stretch of story-time logic to assume when astronauts slide into the vacuum of space that the whole of them, skin tissue, bones, DNA, everything becomes a figurine of Claymation. Today’s audience apparently has too much sophistication and a total lack of imagination where effects are concerned to buy into such a stretch of logic. Oh well, their loss.
Kids these days—they won’t sit down for any of the classics. Maybe we just need NASA to put some money into special-editions, kind of like George Lucas did for Star Wars. Are there any Baby-boomers out there who remember seeing Star Wars in 1977 and thinking, “Wow, these special effects look so real, I feel like I’m actually in space!” and then reviewing the film two-decades later and thinking, “Yeah, um, that doesn’t look nearly so good as I once recall.” It’s kind of like that. Only now we have CG to fill in the pot-holes!
It’s just the little things you need to correct, NASA. Like, when you show those vintage 24-hour time lapse videos of Earth, make sure the clouds move. Russia still has that exact same problem with their satellite footage today—the clouds never seem to move day-after-day-after-day-after-day, so you may want to talk with them about it. Makes sense, right, logistically that is. Stuff like that is important to some people. Not me though. I mean, I’m okay with it—the outdated special effects, because I know none of this is real—so long as the plot is good.
That’s just the thing. It’s simply not interesting anymore. Why isn’t anyone turning out scripts that hearken back to the gut-wrenching dramas of the Apollo 13 mission? Oh, that’s right, the Cold War’s over. We’ve got terrorists as boogie men now. No actual conflicts to win this time, just civilian freedoms to steal—particularly where the internet is concerned—-which is why the government’s moved on to other genres, from science-fiction to pure fantasy. The false flag attacks like Sandy Hook, the Miami Gay Night Club shooting, or that Ariana Grande London explosion hoax are continual. And I nearly forgot the biggest Blockbuster of our time, September 11th. Does anybody still believe it wasn’t an inside job? Look at me, I’m getting off track again. That’s an entirely different topic for another rant.
But you know, getting back to space and Hollywood—I have to admit, I’m somewhat a fan of Stanley Kubrick, and if there is an Apollo 11 moon landing Director’s Cut with his name attached to it, produced of course by Walt Disney Studios, then I’d love to get my hands on a copy.
Until that happens, I have to raise my kids in a world—and I never imagined such a day would come or that I’d even be talking about this—where I’ll explain to them, whenever the television is on, that what they’re watching isn’t real, even if the majority of our sleepy population claims it is.
How does a parent introduce human life into the world by explaining to them how this is just one massively-budgeted, delusional, and seemingly unending stage production of the late, great, planet Earth?
“The Wrong Side of History”—War Criminals Prefer Flat Earth Maps
FORMER U.S. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA once famously stated, “We don’t have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society!” Perhaps that’s because Barack Hussein Obama was too busy plotting war crimes against people. And killing people he did.
Despite candidate Obama’s pledge to sweep away Bush’s entanglement in Iraq and Afghanistan, no other US President fulfilled the unexpected legacy of two full terms at war. He is the very definition of a wartime president, and unlike his predecessor, Obama’s killing rampage was spread worldwide. During his final year in office alone, a stunning grand finale of 26,171 bombs were dropped—that would be 72 per day—and US special operations were active in 70% of the world’s nations, totaling 138 countries—a 130% increase over the Bush administration.
While filling in the breadth of two bloody-terms, thousands of innocent civilians were murdered, a total number which will likely forever remain unknown, and nearly 3 million people were deported from US shores. Where was the liberal outrage then? Even the Nobel Secretary regrets Obama’s peace prize. Indeed, the man who promised peace set the world ablaze. The Iran nuclear deal and the opening of diplomatic relations with Cuba stand alone as President Obama’s successful uses of diplomacy over hostility. Even Iran is criticized as a terrible farce. And history—true history, if permitted to be written—will alone be the judge as to his full participation in the formation and further strengthening of ISIS, unlike what we are currently led to believe among the gatekeepers of our media.
To the liberal, Barack Hussein Obama was painted as a reluctant warrior—a dove of peace; when in fact he was an iron-clad eagle of war with both talons spread.
Obama’s embrace of drones has led to a preference for killing rather than capturing terrorists. And killing, such machines are certainly proficient at. Not only have women and children been slaughtered as part of its collateral damage package, but young men of military age who the Obama administration preemptively counts as combatants—they too became acceptable moving targets in his worldwide hunting grounds. After condemning Bush for detaining terrorists in Guantanamo, he upped the ante by not only keeping the prison open, but terminating people worldwide without trial.
I suppose if you’re going to run an Empire, you’re going to commit war crimes. Certainly not an excuse, but it’s impossible not to, seeing as how America is an Empire on par with Rome, unless your Calvin Coolidge and you like to sleep by the fishing pole. Barack Hussein Obama liked golf nearly so much as he salivated over the thought of dropping bombs, and he liked to hit his targets. Perhaps that’s why, when it came to committing the deed, the White House Situation Room employed the use of a polar azimuthal equidistant map.
That would be a Flat Earth map.
According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), a polar azimuthal equidistant map is accurate in displaying continents and oceans. Globe maps, oddly enough, are not—particularly where air and aquatic navigation is concerned. To this day the equidistant Flat Earth map is employed for such purposes—air and sea perfection; or in the case of the Obama administration, for dropping bombs. And yet the USGS enforces a disclaimer that the equidistant map is only reliable for measuring a precise distance from the North Pole to any other longitude-latitude line on the map. Contrarily, many seafarers—braving the Southern Hemisphere—have been tormented, delayed, and even pronounced unexplainably off course for grossly miscalculating Antarctica’s size, and the distance between outstretched continents in that hemisphere, when calculating their course on globe maps. As many Flat Earth proponents know, the equidistant map is entirely reliable. And the government, despite filling every classroom with a globe—which is completely useless for any sort of navigational purpose except to fill the child’s mind with superstition regarding a plight from Earth, which will never happen—knows this too.
It is difficult for most people to understand the layout of FLAT EARTH, and are largely incapable of committing themselves to further research on the subject, because since they days of the diaper they have opened up their mouths and said, “Ahhhhh!” for the magic choo-choo as globe-Earth was spoon-fed into them. Those who are incapable of getting off the magic choo-choo at the next stop will find themselves laughing right along with Scientism’s prominent enforcer and children’s actor Bill Nye the Science Guy, who uses his apparent scientific prestige to deceive globe proponents with psy-op fabricated falsities by mockingly telling Flat Earthers to “drive to the edge and take pictures” as proof.
It is a shame that Bill Nye the Science Guy, during his White House visits, never once asked President Obama if he could visit the Situation Room, just so that he could see for himself and come to understand what a true and accurate Earth map looked like—sufficient at least for deploying troops and dropping bombs.
Among his unprecedented wars and killing sprees, I am reminded that Obama spoke of being on the right side or wrong side of history more than any other U.S. President. “History will end up recording that at every juncture,” Obama claimed regarding his administrative actions in the Middle-East, “we were on the right side of history.” Did you hear that—at every juncture? It seems Obama is a moral man. He knows much about it—future history, that is; who is on the right and who is on the wrong side.
Those whom he appoints as terrorists, unknowingly and without trial for example, are on the wrong side of history—as are Flat Earthers. Former Secretary of State John Kerry, when speaking at his usual Climate Talks, said: “Members of the Flat Earth Society are on the wrong side of history.”
You know, that really hurts, Mr. Secretary. But I guess I can’t take it too personal, kind of like when he accused ‘climate change’ skeptics of believing that with “the melting of the ice and the rise of sea level, all that extra water is just going to spill over the sides of a flat Earth.”
I can’t take it too personal, because he also would know something about that, wouldn’t he—those who are on his wrong side of history—particularly since he would be intimately familiar with the equidistant map in the Situation Room, having set his mind upon it repeatedly, and undoubtedly sat in on some of the killings.
“Climate Chaos” Does Not Exist in a Terrarium
MY READERS WILL BY THEIR OWN RESEARCH CONCLUDE that a terrarium is self-sufficient for the needs of its ecosystem. That is my contention, anyhow. Had I known about the Doctrine of Flat Earth at an earlier time—that we are as the Bible claims living “in the Earth”—then I would have taken up this pressing matter long ago; that is, wrestling against the “climate chaos” crowd within my own camp, and doing so simply by adhering to what the Holy Ghosts testifies as true, rather than sitting idly by in the back row watching my gullible brothers and sisters in the faith volunteer to be scammed by Elite they so eagerly salute. No matter, I take an issue with it now.
I think about David Latimer of Cranleigh, England, somewhere just north of 80 years-old at the moment of this writing, and last he recalls watering his favorite house plant, Richard Nixon was the sitting US President. It’s still thriving. Since that time—for the record, 1972—Latimer’s hardy spiderworts plant has grown to comfortably fill the 10-gallon bottle he first seeded on Easter Sunday, 1960, by surviving entirely on recycled air, nutrients, and water, with an added dosage of sunlight through the nearest window some 6-feet away—in short, photosynthesis. What we know of an enclosed garden system, as David Latimer’s experiment and countless others will most certainly attest to, is that such an eco-system is self-sustaining.
More importantly to this discussion, they and Mr. Latimer’s 10-gallon house-plant, as well as the self-enclosed terrarium the Bible describes us as living in, are in no need of government assistance or the taxpayer money demanded—all with the backing threat of a prison sentence, if we do not agree to the thievery—to line the pockets of its lawmakers with, all for their very existence and well-being. This will likely imply one thing for global warming, or climate change, or climate chaos, whatever the interchangeable title is today—it’s as I’ve already suggested and what so many of us know to be true in the Spirit; a complete hoax, and a scam, and likely even the greatest hustle among the present age of man.
Climate chaos apologists will likely look at the collected data presented to them and call anyone who should oppose their overlords, on the basis of finding conflicting data, a “science denier.” I myself am no stranger to the term, and warmly welcome such a time-honored badge if Moses also should find inclusion in the conflict. My Flat Earth brethren will surely agree that the so-called denier of Scientism rejects it on the basis that he conducts his own research or analyzes all the data afforded to him, even the purposefully overlooked data, such as the healthy build-up of Arctic sea ice and the “cooked-book” data from Global Warmings own generals, where-as warming trends cannot be proven without it, and has the common sense to recognize a lie for what it is. An apologist however will eagerly accept an invite to the multi-million dollar beachfront property of climate spokesman Al Gore, should the handshake be extended, while the so-called denier will try to keep the amusement contained within him at the very prospect that Gore only recently purchased multi-million dollar beachfront property when, according to his flawless research, should have been buried underwater over a decade ago.
There at least 60 times that I can find whereas the Bible refers to God’s creation as “in the Earth.” It suffices me to know there are a number of readers out there who will inevitably stumble upon this exhibiting necks well balanced on their shoulders and a head screwed on just sight, so that they may be able to visualize what the Holy Ghosts seeks to incur upon the reader when He pens the phrase. Knowing that we live below a solid firmament, specifically “in the Earth,” and that the sun and the moon and the stars move about us, not mind you above the firmament where God resides, but underneath it, and that the very ground below my feet is the celestial floor by which I may observe the chandelier of our self-enclosed system with, I can then listen to what my Scientism overlords say concerning the sudden emergence of “climate chaos” in their fantastical billions of years of evolutionary timetable scenario, and compare it to the Bible’s 6,000 years of well-documented history, where much change has happened. This I do not deny; the change from our Creation week to the days we find ourselves in now, much as I do not deny the flood of Noah’s day. The Earth, specifically everything in the Earth, has always has a spectacular way of correcting itself.
Amazing how our overlords talk and they talk and they talk, and how my fellow Christians praise them with the Greeks for their talk, and how when I hold the truth of the Word as a filter for my ears, I only see the animation of motor-mouths, for the most part. Anyhow, their continuous talk looks tiresome!
A needy person, when his attention is demanded of others, does not exhibit a desirable trait. And yet this is exactly what our government is, always in need of us—always in need to fight their wars and expand their personal interests and purchase their drugs and accept their vaccinations and line their gluttonous pockets with money, all which must coincide with a strict obedience to their evolutionary Sciences and most recently, the total disbanding of families.
We can begin to see why the global New World Order should have no desire to recognize the Bible as true in their endless talk, especially the Doctrine of Flat Earth with its talk of a terrarium, because they are in need of us far more than we of them. And who should fill the needs of anyone who submits to the Bible but God alone? It is clear that they do not want this of us, depending on the Lord for nourishment that is, rather than their governing body, nor do they wish the health of this terrarium, which is most certainly not in need of them either, when their most recent crowning achievement, the Paris Climate Agreement, promises an endless supply of pockets to fill.
The politician arrives among the waving of flags, sometimes even placing his hand on the Bible, and with stars-and-stripes bleeding through the eyes of his onlookers, one or two of them is sure to turn to somebody like me, just before the continual march towards the cliff commences, and protest: “Why aren’t you contributing to the program?”
“I’m sorry,” is my response to that person, “I wasn’t able to hear anything that politician just said. I was using my Bible as a filter.”
Ah, the Memories—When the U.S. Landed Satan On the Moon!
A CHRISTIAN WILL UNDOUBTEDLY OPEN UP HIS BIBLE TO READ of Satan, Belial, Baal, Beelzebub, Lucifer, Abaddon, and Apollyon, easily concluding they are all one and the same person, that crafty serpent of old, and then, having thoroughly closed its binding, put no second thought to standing back and admiring Walter Conkite’s finest hour—NASA’s Apollo missions, that is—as if somehow he also, the deity Apollo, is not one of his other names, being openly identified as the same Apollyon who is given the key to the bottomless pit. The Great Delusion is right here before us, as definitively as wet sticks to the rain, and the only Christian incapable of seeing it isn’t the one who cannot, but the one who will not—and there’s a difference.
“9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” Revelation 12:9 (KJV)
One must almost be pressed to feel sorrow for the entire Apollo 11 crew during their moon landing press conference—all three of them, Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin. Just looking at that video footage, one might easily conclude they are the embodiment of a country song. Somebody shot their dog and told them Santa Clause doesn’t exist before cruelly turning the cameras on. I wonder if it has anything to do with President Obama saying we’ve never left Earth orbit. Perhaps….Or maybe we’ve had it wrong all along, inasmuch as the moon landing wasn’t simply a hoax of Scientism, as the claim rightfully goes, but a far more sinister deception of the spiritual nature.
The masterful crafting of public perception is in how carefully NASA’s occultist underbelly has remained concealed from its admirers for so long. The Germans who took part in the founding of the U.S. space program through Operation Paperclip, Nazi’s such as Wernher von Braun, saw to it that the seedy-side remained in the furthest harvesting field from public viewing. Symbolism is important in witchcraft. The NASA logo displays a forked tongue of the serpent to symbolize it is under the control of Satan. It is nothing short of significant that the NASA moon missions were named Apollo. The sun god is often depicted riding a horse-drawn chariot with the sun shining behind him, so it should be no surprise that the Apollo 13 emblem appears to show the sun god’s horses pulling the globe, which is Satan’s fingerprint, rather than him.
“3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: 4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.” 2 Corinthians 4:34 (KJV)
Everybody’s favorite Freemason and Confederate Brigadier-General Albert Pike, in Morals and Dogma, stated, “Masonry is the search for light. That leads us directly back, as you see, to the Kabbalah.” He furthermore went on to claim, “Lucifer, the Light-Bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! It is he who bears the light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish souls? Doubt it not!”
Almost everything NASA does is deluded with magic and alchemy. Kabbalah and astronomy are intertwined, as is Kabbalah with Freemasonry. And Kabbalah, being unapologetic witchcraft through-and-through, contains embedded rivers of occultist mysticism which seek to invoke the powers of devils, is a construct of Judaism. Freemasonry and NASA of course are blood-brothers—my reader will be satisfied conducting his own research on the matter—and the goal of Freemasonry is to masquerade Zionist victory everywhere in the world until the New World Order is established. So here we have before us a process which involves the creation of satanic ritual magic enabling the Illuminati Elite to acquire their coveted power even as the mind-controlled and manipulated masses are directed into the Alpha-state, or ever increasing states of altered consciousness.
This tangled-web weaved may seem over-complicated at first, but it all simply belongs to the same spider. It is the End Times deception we’ve all been wondering about, which is purposed, through the Zionists New World Order, to give rise to their Anti-Christ.
“And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.” Daniel 8:25 (KJV)
It is perplexing indeed to take note of the Christian who sat around his television screen on July 20, 1969, making exemption of Satan’s moon landing, if only because he preferred the bewitching wonder of it all over the Bible’s account of creation, which is considered by most mundane. The Doctrine of Flat Earth however, as my reader will likely note, is wholly satisfactual to this author. We know that the moon cannot be landed upon, except perhaps to slap it across the thigh, if it is indeed possible to do so and the man is braver than most or stupid. Had the Christian not made such an exemption to Satan 11’s successful Hollywood broadcasting or turned a blind-eye to the Masonic lodge down his street, an undeniable sponsor of their beloved NASA, which by its very prayerful inclusion of all gods, thereby providing the embodiment of true enlightenment, we see mankind’s most damnable transgression—his refusal to condone sin. Just look at the mess we’re in!
When my Christian brethren takes a moment to ponder the conclusive fact that these things must happen, the deception must continue, Zionism must conquer creation through the dreaded New World Order, and the greatest alchemist in history, the Anti-Christ, must be crowned; this must all happen before the Lord may establish His eternal throne, then in light of these things we must also consider how very few of our fellow man will be saved from the Lake of Fire, where the Beast and the whore of Babylon and their confederation of conspirators are promised to be thrown, if indeed the lie is to continue to its fullest measure.
So we recklessly cast the seeds of God’s Testimony concerning Himself, the whole testimony—or the Doctrine of Flat Earth, whereas this and so much more is brought to light because of it—into the rocky and thorny soil, as well as the soft, hoping to save whom God wills. We also must equally recognize in all humility that we are not here to conquer any cause, as the affairs of the world are concerned, because soon after the internet is done with us—once our voices are silenced to the beast—those of us who proclaim the truth in these perilous times, choosing rightness where the government is wrong, may very likely give our lives to the cause.
If it is not for Yeshua Hamashiach and His atoning sacrifice on the cross, then it is no worthwhile cause at all.
It’s Only a Paper Moon, and No Marvel—a Lunar Rock Is a Paper Weight, Accordingly
THERE ARE NO TREES ON THE MOON. The Dutch government has come to this satisfactory conclusion, having tested their very own “moon rock” and finding contradictory results from what one might expect of its U.S. endorsed title. The rock in question was first gifted to Willem Drees, a former Dutch leader, and presented to him during a global tour by the Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin. When the Dutch wisely thought to have it sent to the lab, knowing after all that they were dealing with the Cold War propaganda of Americans, the results revealed in no uncertain terms that their present from NASA was a paper weight at best—petrified wood, actually.
Frank Beunk, a geologist involved with its investigation, summed it up accordingly, “It’s a nondescript, pretty-much worthless stone.”
Of the 270 Apollo 11 moon rocks and Apollo 17 “Goodwill” moon rocks that were gifted to the nations of the world by its participating astronauts and the Richard M. Nixon Administration, approximately 180 are currently unaccounted for, some being “accidently” disposed of along the way, such as unfortunate mix-ups with landfills. Of the remainders known whereabouts, many have been locked away in storage for decades, cleverly removed from the public eye. And it should come as little to no surprise among my readers that the missing moon rocks which happen to “turn up” on the black market, they’re proven fakes every time.
The selling of “fake” moon rocks became such a recognized problem in the years following the Apollo moon missions that, at the turn of the last century, the United States federal government created a special undercover task force in hopes of apprehending them before they became a public issue. These sting operations, known as Operation Lunar Eclipse, were first headed up Senior Special Agent Joseph Gutheinz of NASA’s Office of Inspector General (NASA OIG), posing as Tony Coriasso, and Inspector Bob Cregger of the United States Postal Inspection Service, posing as John Marta. Agents from the United States Customs Service would later get involved, and rather than demanding that the media narrative be upheld, one which claims the highest levels of the U.S. Government simply and truly cares about the poor elderly space enthusiasts who are being swindled by con-artists, let us consider the next point.
Federal prosecution would ultimately expand to include the criminalization of selling any “moon rock,” whether provably gifted by NASA or otherwise found to be fictitious. Such was the case with Joann Davis, a 75 year-old woman who was in 2011 interrogated for hours by six armed federal agents in front of a California Denny’s restaurant, pants soaked in urine, simply for attempting to sell a legally obtained moon rock the size of a grain of rice, which was intended, she said, to pay for her son’s medical care. Most notably, the pebble was gifted to her late husband by Neil Armstrong, and as such, she had the perfect right to barter it off for nickels in a garage sale. NASA however considers the moon and anything retrieved from the moon to be government property, even if it was at one time gifted.
The Holland moon rock wasn’t exactly an easy mix-up either, as if a random stone would find its way into Michael Collins gym bag on the way from the airport—and mind you, not just any chunk of pavement from the side of the highway either. As part of their criminal investigation, the Dutch preformed a thorough background check, and finding no such petrified tree having ever existed in Europe, Asia, or the America’s, determined its origins to have stemmed from the furthest reaches of the Earth—Antarctica.
It just goes to show, Satan can do nothing but masquerade Himself into something which he is not. In short, he is a loser. We know this to be true because he is ill equipped to create anything—not even the simplest of Earthly pleasures has he invented—except to distort what is good and true of his Creator, our Creator, so as to pass it off as his own. And this is exactly what he does—plagiarize in the most-wicked fashion. It has already been well-established by this point that Satan warped our understanding of God’s created order—and in the case of the moon, convincing the world and the church entrusted with the truth of God’s Word that a transport named in his honor, Apollo, had landed upon it. Yet not even the devil has the ability to venture to the surface of that luminary in our steed, it seems, if such action would succeed in retrieving the simplest of souvenirs (should that transparent disk, which gives forth her own light, contain a single stone), because even the moon rocks which were purported by its conspirators to have originated form its lunar surface are proven forgeries.
“And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.” 2 Corinthians 11:14
The secret must not get out. It cannot get out. The moon is not landable upon, and should the simplest grain of rice be placed on the market, having once been purported by Collins, Aldrin, Armstrong, or Nixon to originate from its lunar surface, prosecutions must be carried out! The Earth is provably stationary by every honest and measurable scientific experiment, as the Bible rightly claims, which makes everything about this current beast government, with their pathetic attempt at swapping moon rocks with petrified trees, illegitimate.
Our governing authorities certainly are illegitimate in every sense of the word. And if the moon rocks are fake—that they most certainly are—it’s because the Elites who conspired against the Lord by agreeing to collect them in the furthest outer-rim of our circular FLAT EARTH had already sold their souls to the very slave master who cannot create anything unless it prove a forgery. Everything about him is illegitimate, as is anyone who sells their soul to him for the power they so desperately crave. Indeed, Satan is a looser, and as many a-reader will note, his time is coming to an abrupt end.
The Crowning Achievement of Transcendence
Or Satan’s Hatred of FLAT EARTH
TO KNOW THE BEGINNING IS TO RECOGNIZE THE END. For anyone paying attention, that’s clearly where we find ourselves—somewhere at or just about near the end of church history. And you know, as one who finally recognizes and fundamentally adheres to the Holy Scripture’s doctrine of Flat Earth, that entire evolutionary lie that we all evolved, not simply from apes but at its genesis from cosmic star dust—the genetic coding of the angels or “the sons of god” is what it’s really alluding to—really, truly, and finally makes sense. It’s what this entire space race has been about for the last seventy years, human transcendence; breaking through the firmament barrier that separates us from God. To understand this Great Delusion with picture-perfect clarity we simply need to trace its roots back to the lie of the Serpent in the garden, and the dots are finally connected.
“…and you will be like God…” Genesis 3:5
Space—in its lengthy literary canon of science-fiction that gave strength, purpose, and even imaginative reality to the historical forms as we know them, literally, it’s become this titanic analogy for death, with man’s anti-gospel resting on his own ability to break God’s curse once and for all without repentance of sin or the necessary intervention of Jesus’ atoning sacrifice as a cleansing agent, but with hopes of accomplishing it on his own by transcending to the heights. If the Bible is the Lord’s testimony to an enclosed stationary system, for all practical purposes called Flat Earth—and I am fully convicted that such a view is indeed faithful to God’s intended, unbroken revelation—then we should easily be able to conclude what gates are attempted at being battered down.
Is the reader following?
They tried it long ago in the land of Shinar, wherein a people of one language said, “Let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.” Genesis 11:4
And they’re trying it again.
NASA is the Hebrew word for: to go up, ascend, climb, though in some historical variations it is also purposed as meaning: to deceive. And what is Satan’s stated goal? The star who fell from heaven, as he is rightly referred to in Revelation, is accredited in Isaiah as having said: “I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.” Isaiah 14:14 (KJV) In the Bible’s cosmogony, there’s only two ways out of here. Up…..or down.
And death takes up both options.
Is the reader understanding this yet—are your questions beginning to get answered as to why the Lord is rescuing His saints from the murky depths of this dreadful delusion? Does he see why this is so important? Scientism’s catapulted pursuit of technological transcendence is a regurgitated lie, repackaged perhaps, but in the end it’s all the same thing, and it’s quickly coming to a head.
“Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.” Amos 3:7 (KJV)
This is the mystery Babylon gospel we’ve all been warned about, the Luciferian religion of the New World Order, the End Times LIE, the ultimate technological advancement of human evolution and the trans-humanists wet dream. Throw in otherworldly-inspired advancements within quantum physics, which promises to tear through the cosmic curtain with newfound mystical truths beyond our wildest imaginations, and it all ties together into one completed package, be it a damning one.
The lie still remains the same—we all desire to become like God.
“7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, 8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. 9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” Revelation 12: 7-9 (KJV)
Nimrod flung arrows at God, and now we fire rockets. I simply can’t take the willful arrogance anymore, the dutiful pride dominated by a righteous sense of western nationalism. We Christians are to be different than the rest. Satan has deceived us all into committing ourselves to his work. False teaching has taken the church captive.
It was our Lord Yeshua Hamashiach who said: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber (John 10:1).”
Reader beware, there is only one way in which we are permitted to ascend into the heavens, and that is through Yeshua Hamashiach, Jesus Christ our Lord. Everyone else, by whatever method, is breaking in through the back way. Let us fall humbly before our God and know what He has declared to us is worthy of our consideration and obedient adherence, and above all else is true.
“They Kept Not Their First Estate,” or the Heliocentric Lie: Not of Men but of Angels
I HAVE OFTEN HEARD IT STATED HOW THIS GRAND-SCHEMED heliocentric lie could not have been made possible without the angels who kept not their first estate, forsaking their prescribed courses in the heavens to become the seven wandering stars we know today, or planets in Greek. This is only a partial truth at best. The luminaries did in fact forsake their first estate, and when Yeshua Hamashiach walked the Earth, this was well regarded by the elect. Not only did the Savior authorize Enoch as Canon, but his disciple Peter and half-brother Jude each devoted a book thematically to it. Yet what is the good of a deception if everyone is in the know? In order for the globe delusion to be made possible, Enoch not only had to be thrown out of canon entirely—far more devilishly, he had to be buried so far deep into the ground that it wouldn’t be rediscovered for an entire millennia.
“For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment…” 2 Peter 2:4
Finally, having a grand scope of things, we can now see the true brilliance of Satan who, unlike a chess battle with the child prodigy Bobby Fischer, was plotting his strategy several dozen moves—no, centuries—no, even millennia’s before him—even from the very beginning. So too is Satan a patient fellow, seeking not the philosophical oversight with one solitary generation, where sound doctrine is concerned, but with careful groundwork and the slow build-up of grand engineering—an entire metropolis of lies rather than suburban housing—room enough for the total overthrow of many. We may simply take note of his handiwork in the generations following our founding church fathers, having once hailed Enoch as sound doctrine, now hear whispered in their ear, “You don’t really believe this silly interchange of business between celestial angels and humans, do you? If you truly are a God-fearing fellow, you must denounce such nonsense as untrue.”
“13 I saw there seven stars like great burning mountains, and to me, when I inquired regarding them, 14 And there I beheld seven stars, like great blazing mountains, and like spirits entreating me. The angel said: ‘This place is the end of heaven and earth: this has become a prison for the stars and the host of heaven. 15 Then the angel said, This place, until the consummation of heaven and earth, will be the prison of the stars, and the host of heaven. And the stars which roll over the fire are they which have transgressed the commandment of the Lord in the beginning of their rising, because they did not come forth at their appointed times. 16 The stars which roll over fire are those which transgressed the commandment of God before their time arrived; for they came not in their proper season. And He was wroth with them, and bound them till the time when their guilt should be consummated (even) for ten thousand years.” Enoch 18:13-16
How embarrassing for Enoch’s antagonists, once he was rediscovered under the sands of Qumran, included with his original Aramaic texts, that we would confirm over 100 New Testament phrases and theological teachings which first find precedence in Enoch, not the other way around—that Gospel writers and the Apostles basically took Enoch textually and ran with it, including Peter, including Jude, including John the Revelator—that Enoch is the perfect puzzle-piece which seamlessly locks the Old and New Testaments together into a colorful tapestry—and even more tragically, and a glaring oversight by its staunchest rejecters, that Yeshua Hamashiach Himself used the book as a springboard for many of His sermons, including perhaps dozens of theological quotes which mirror or match that of Enoch’s.
No, not only embarrassing—it is truly tragic for generations of the gullible that we bothered listening to Satan at all, casting aside sound doctrine which would have spared many, only to have him turn the very lie used in the expulsion of Enoch to elevate the great globe delusion, and worse, write into astronomy the very testimony of Enoch into his own warped gospel for the masses, “The aliens are soon arriving for an interchange of business with man—and they’re coming from the stars!”
“And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.” Jude 1:6
Imagine the God-fearing woman who might look up at the planets—named so-much as gods demanding the worship of past ages and the occultist practices of present—and with Enoch opened in her hands, and with Peter and Jude to back them, say to the luminaries, “You have transgressed the commandment of the Lord in the beginning of your rising, because you did not come out at your proper times!”
What might the god-fearing child have to say to her godless government-sponsored teacher and class, when asked to make a “scale” model of the planets around the sun in defiance of Hebrew Cosmogony and Enoch, and with Peter and Jude and Yeshua Himself to stand in her defense, but: “And the angels, keeping not their first estate, but left their own habitation, He the Lord hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.”
The Copernican delusion would certainly have sidestepped around us—those of us who fear the Lord, and likely would not have happened at all if the church had the courage to stand against it. But his rediscovery under the sands of Qumran arrived too late in the narrative of human history. Two World Wars had already been fought and, without even inventing an airplane or a tower so high, which might check to see if there truly was a curve—as was so eagerly anticipated by all—everyone had agreed upon it, including the Christian. The lie was embedded, decided upon and celebrated, and the long sought-after book, no matter how truthful it proved, with wisdom that defies the ages, was no longer the knowledge they sought after. That ship had sailed.
No worries, Enoch was not written for them anyways.
In his opening dialogue, the wise and knowledgeable Enoch states: “But it (his revelation) was not for this generation to know, but for a remote one which is to come.”
That generation is us. We are the remote one first spoken of, which rediscovered his words and cherished them as fact, not as silly-superstitious fact but as heavenly manna for the poor in spirit who recognizes the angelic oppression of Scientism and Academia upon this Earth and desperately need words to cling to. We are the generation, which Enoch takes careful note of in his very opening remark, “….the elect and righteous, who will be living in the day of tribulation, when all the wicked and godless people are to be removed from the Earth.”
When we open the pages of Enoch, for those of us who embrace the complete Testimony of God through Moses and the Prophets and the Apostles—we call this the Doctrine of Flat Earth—it is as if he speaks only and directly to us (beyond the first few generations which were needed to establish its credentials), and I most certainly believe this to be the case. It was lost and found that it might confirm our observations as true, to this generation only, and thereby commission us to turn to Yeshua Hamashiach as our Lord and Savior, because when we begin to understand these things—the great globe delusion that is, as in the days of Noah—we can know the end is near.
“14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, 15 To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.” Jude 1:14-16
That Hidden Darkness—Science & Its Union with Fallen Angels on FLAT EARTH
NOWHERE IN THE BIBLE DO WE FIND “TECHNOLOGY” and “scientific understanding” portrayed as a means by which God pours out his grace upon the world. Nor are there described in Scripture invisible laws imbued upon Creation which our Lord purposed us to seek out, to swoop up with a philosophical butterfly net, to quantify or formulate secret mysteries as a way to seek Him and get to know Him better—and in the end harness that power for our own advancement or pleasure. False teaching has taken the church captive. If the Holy Spirit is waking up a remnant of His church to the truth of Flat Earth, and I certainly believe this to be the case, then the murky tomb by which He pulled us up and out of—this terrible idolatrous slumber—quickly becomes exposed. It wasn’t God who commissioned mankind to bring to light the mystery knowledge, but Satan’s angels—the fallen ones.
A spiritual subscriber to the Book of Enoch simply would not veer to the right or left of his message to support any government’s quest for scientific or technological superiority over their enemies, because Enoch made it clear that our communion with the angels, not God, made “cultured civilization” as we know it possible. No wonder the “Holy” Roman Church, when acquisitioning the traditions and culture of the very spiritual kingdom that it had for centuries attempted to mutilate in the arena, the same Christianity it now crowned itself the rightful heirs and caretakers of, not only stripped Enoch’s rights as an inspired Book from the Bible, but had it buried deep underground—the simplest of readings will attest to this.
“1 And Azazel taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and taught them about metals of the Earth and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids, and all kinds of precious stones, and all coloring and dyes. 2 And there was great impiety; they turned away from God, and committed fornication, and they were led astray, and became corrupt in all their ways.” Enoch 8:1-2
Enoch further describes in verse 3 how the angels taught “the casting of spells,” “counter-spells,” “astrology,” “constellation portents,” and “knowledge of the clouds, signs of the earth, sun, and course of the moon.” Contrast needs to be made here between this false-scientific delusion that was once hidden in darkness and brought to light accordingly by the fallen angels compared to the Hebrew belief in a self-enclosed cosmological order, revealed by God’s own testimony in the Holy Scripture and further upheld by Enoch throughout his continued narrative. As a result of these teachings, not Enoch’s but the angels, the writer notes: “And as men perished, they cried, and their cry went up to heaven.”
While I seek to employ The Book of Enoch for consideration, which stands as a lasting testimony to the truth of an enclosed cosmology, to be fair it’s the Flat Earth revelation itself, when contained within the boundaries of our existing Bible, which reveals in no uncertain terms that the contemporary church has succumbed to a gross misconception of science. If we’re honest I think we all bought into this idea—I certainly know I did—that it was our own “Christian worldview” which made modern science possible and that “Scientism” took a wrong turn only recently in history when several loose cannons within its ranks invented Darwinism, allowing for the terrible conclusions which naturally skew from its preconceptions. It’s all a part of the same lie.
Rather than embracing what God testifies of Himself in the Bible and all that the doctrine of Flat Earth broadly implies, I hear this rebuttal constantly by those in the church who reject that doctrine merely on the basis of: “But what of all the scientists? The Christian scientists! You can’t group all scientists into one basket!”
Despite the technological nightmare that encapsulated our last century, led by our Masters of Ceremony in the cult of Scientism, and which further promises to define ours beyond any comparable measure, those of us who have come out of the globular lie must acknowledge that we were blinded to the false teaching of the Kabbalistic texts which inspired such great men as Sir Isaac Newton, with his discovery of “gravity,” and the simultaneous embracing of Hermeticism, with its invisible forces which can be understood and manipulated and turned into a formula. We were lost unknowingly in the fog by this entire notion that it was God’s desire all along to reveal Himself through the natural philosophy that originated with the Greeks and mystery schools and the Babylonians and the Egyptians and not merely through the Hebrew writers of the Holy Scriptures who forsook such teachings as devotions to sorcery (and the voices lifting beyond the cosmic curtain which spoke knowledge through such practice).
This debate isn’t just about Ball Earth verses Flat Earth. What the Flat Earth awakening brings to light is not the secret mysteries of science as the Globe Earth does, but western civilization itself, fully exposed in its wretched nakedness—again, and I can’t repeat this enough, not God’s instrument for the continual-expansion of His kingdom, as Globe Earth proposes. Rather, it’s rooted in the very Luciferian lie by which the Globe model chains its disciples to. The Globe Earth, and all that pertains to it, is an end-times instrument for the kingdom of darkness.
Gene Roddenberry and Star Trek’s Impossible Five-Year Mission: “To Boldly Go Where No Man Is Ever Capable of Going”
HE ENVISIONED A FUTURE WITHOUT RELIGION. To this end Gene Roddenberry found cause for celebration, and a dedicated weekly audience to join in. The entire platform for Star Trek built its foundation upon such principles, one in which Moses, Yeshua, and the Prophets were condemned in their efforts, not only for uttering blasphemous falsities against the institution of Scientism, but according to Roddenberry, for committing a far worse crime against generations of humanity—taking away the power of rational decision and draining people of their free will. To this he added, “Religions vary in their degree of idiocy, but I reject them all. For most people, religion is nothing more than a substitute for a malfunctioning brain. If people need religion, ignore them and maybe they will ignore you, and you can go on with your life.”
When Roddenberry began developing Star Trek, it was brought to his attention that he would need a chaplain on board the Enterprise.
To them he replied, “No, we don’t.”
One day in 1975, half a decade after Star Trek had been canceled, actor William Shatner, aka Captain James T. Kirk, decided to walk around the old abandoned stage on the Paramount Studios lot, where the series had been filmed, when he suddenly heard the clapping of a typewriter. Shatner recalls, “That was the strangest thing, because these offices were deserted. So I followed the sound, till I came to the entrance of this building. And the sound was getting louder as I went into the building. I went down a hallway, where the offices for Star Trek were … I opened the door and there was Gene Roddenberry. He was sitting in a corner, typing. I hadn’t seen him in five years. I said, ‘Gene, the series has been canceled!’”
Roddenberry was writing a script for what would eventually become Star Trek: The Motion Picture. And yet the movie which arrived in theaters was not his vision. True to his disdain for Christianity and the Doctrine of Infallibility, Roddenberry was busy fleshing out a story-line where the God of the Bible was revealed to be nothing more than an alien entity in which ancient man had mistakenly believed to be divine. In its climactic conclusion, Captain James T. Kirk was to delve into a fist-fight with the shape-shifting alien of religious superstition on the bridge of the USS Enterprise. After several shape-shifting transitions; always asking the Captain if he knew who he was—Kirk did not—the alien entity finally revealed his most worshiped earth identify. He was Christ the Carpenter.
He was to say, “Do you know me?”
In which Kirk was to reply, “Oh, now I know who you are.”
Thus, the fistfight was to commence.
Concerning his vision for the script, Roddenberry is quoted, “But I also wanted to suggest that it might have been as much the devil as it was God. After all, what kind of god would throw humans out of Paradise for eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge? One of the Vulcan’s on board, in a very logical way, says, ‘If this is your God, he’s not very impressive. He’s got so many psychological problems. He’s so insecure. He demands worship every seven days. He goes out and creates faulty humans and then blames them for his own mistakes. He’s a pretty poor excuse for a supreme being.”
A Christian displays symptoms of cognitive dissonance when expressing surprise at NASA’s proclamation that the name of Jesus may not be uttered within its ranks. And yet mankind’s self-proclaimed manifest destiny in space, which includes the moon landing, is not of God. The Christian must recognize this stark contrast between what he and the humanist are expected to believe. Heaven and all that is in the heavens are not for the taking. This is a truth made pointedly clear in the opening chapter of the Bible. God has not gifted the dominion of heaven to mortal man. All that is within the Earth is ours to subdue and have dominion over, says the Lord (Genesis 1:27-30). But the heavens, not a single passage in the entire Canon of Holy Writ can be found where the realm of the luminaries is permitted by God as an infinite expanse in which we might have interface with, a fence to climb over and explore, let alone conquer or subdue with a religious, philosophical or even scientific attitude. For the trans-humanist, this is Moses and Prophets’ arrest-able offense.
“27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to everything that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.” Genesis 1:27-30 (KJV)
To this proclamation, Roddenberry defiantly states, “Earth is the nest, the cradle, and we’ll move out of it.”
A Christian would never dream that he or she is professing to have faith in two contradictory systems, especially of the religious nature, and which if understood could not be held together in a reasonable mind. But to the believer in Christ, this is what is so important about the doctrine of Flat Earth. It’s not simply a debate over the shape of the world. If this were so, I wouldn’t be writing about it tirelessly (to the frustration of many), and globular Christians would not become so heated, infuriated even, at the mere consideration that their devotion to NASA—the very organization which forbids the mention of Yeshua’s name—is somehow not of God. And yet I urge you, brothers and sisters, to scour through the Holy Scriptures and find God’s commissioning that we should dominate and subdue the heavens, let alone have deeper knowledge of it in addition to the Earth. To claim this chronic pursuit into the heavens is somehow a commissioning which aligns itself with man’s stated purpose is a belief I myself can no longer stand behind.
“We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God,” said Roddenberry, no doubt reflecting upon his own story logic, “who creates faulty humans and then blames them for his own mistakes.”
Roddenberry exhibits the very mocking antichrist spirit which Peter warned us against in the last days. Most of our science-fiction writers do. In fact, I doubt we would have such a genre without it. He said: “For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water (2 Peter 2:5).”
If God went out of His way to let us know He spread a solid firmament over the Earth, a boundary marker which He called heaven, with waters which once drowned the whole world still contained and stored in-plenty, as the Psalmist and the Apostle Peter both attest to, the conclusion should be immediately clear to any God-fearing individual. We have no business going beyond a barrier by which God in the very least claimed to have constructed—or to even make an attempt at it. The exploration of space is wishful thinking for the rebellious sort.
Show Me Your Papers! Sir Isaac Newton’s Secret Confessions (Kabbalah Does Not Exist in FLAT EARTH)
SIR ISAAC NEWTON IS A GOD—A LUMINARY of natural reason and Enlightenment thinking. During his lifetime he was a master of the mint, mathematics professor at Cambridge University, President of the Royal Society, and a knight of the realm. He barely even had time to breathe his dying last before Westminster Abbey made a monument of him. And yet he was a heretic of the worst kind. The positions which he lavished himself with were wholly conditional upon public manifestations of a certain religious devotion, and so he hid his true self under a bushel while letting the hypocrisy shine as a beacon of light. Essentially, he was a Nicodemite. John Calvin coined the term. Newton wore the clothes well. He masterfully fooled the church into thinking he was devoted to the cause of Christ while secretly he gazed into the dark abyss of his own humanist mind.
In a 1991 issue of Christianity Today, “Women in the Medieval Church,” Charles E. Hummel dedicated a lovey-dovey propaganda-piece to Isaac Newton, which dripped with all the springtime sap and the patriotic fluff and gloop of a tender-hearted eulogy, which a proponent of gravity or Scientism delusionist, as well as Newton’s own descendants—who labored to hide the inconvenient nature of Newton’s Nicodemite heresy—could be proud of. Hummel writes, “A member of the Anglican church, Newton attended services and participated in special projects, such as praying for the distribution of Bibles among the poor.” In the same article, he douses an extra coating of sugar-coated frosting with: “Newton’s understanding of God came primarily from the Bible, which he studied for days and weeks at a time.”
Strange indeed that Christianity Today thought it unimportant to divulge the fruit of Newton’s laborious studies—mainly, what his “understanding of God” entailed. Privately, Newton denied the trinity. Jesus Yeshua was not divine.
I don’t know if there’s an expert alive who has read the entirety of Isaac Newton’s work. With an estimated 10 million written words having survived the centuries, half of which is of the religious nature and another 1 million devoted to alchemical material, it is a behemoth collection. Even Sarah Dry, author of “The Newton Papers: The Strange and True Odyssey of Isaac Newton’s Manuscripts,” laughs at the very notion. Though, concerning its contents, she warns, “And one of the messages of the book is that getting too involved in the papers can be hazardous to your health. One of the first editors of (Newton’s) papers said an older man should take up the task, because he’d have less to lose than a younger man.”
In short, Isaac Newton was a disciple of “Jewish philosophy, the mysticism of Kabbalah and the Talmud”—This, according to Aron Heller at the Times of Israel. What most Christians do not know—or rather, the cat which has remained for the most part in the bag—is that Isaac Newton was a mystic and occultist. On these humanist learnings he developed the natural philosophy which even now dominate most people’s worldview—mainly, gravity.
- Pancoast, author of Kabbala: Or True Science of Light (1883) celebrates Newton’s discovery of gravity when he writes: “Indeed, so much of the Newtonian Philosophy do we find in the ancient, that we cannot doubt he had been exploring the old mines of Kabbalistic lore, and had arrived at his great discoveries by following up clues gained therefrom.” Again he writes: “He (Pythagoras) was never permitted to declare publicly what he knew and believed, but taught his immediate pupils all the wonders of his philosophy, under the most binding obligation of secrecy. Pythagoras was forbidden to divulge this knowledge because it would reveal the law of attraction and repulsion, which constituted one of the great secrets of the sanctuary. Over a millennium later, Newton was led to the discovery of these forces by his studies of the Kabbalah.”
It is of no coincide then that Abraham Yahuda, a Zionist Jew and contemporary of Albert Einstein, scoured the world collecting Newton’s religious writings. According to Sarah Dry, Yahuda “set about trying to purchase the Newton papers and wrote to (his wife) Ethel on July 28, ‘I am thrilled with the thought of acquiring them. He wrote a lot about the Bible and the Jews, about Cabbala and all sorts of Jewish questions.”
Einstein took an immediate interest in his work. Sarah Dry, revealing that Einstein had hoped that Newton’s papers would never get published, also says of their inspiration: “Einstein considered Newton’s private papers with an eye toward gleaning as much as possible of his method of discovery, what he refers to here in “the formative development” of his work in physics. Einstein implicitly links the process by which Newton developed his physics and his theology; by studying the one, we might gain insight into the other.”
Gravity cannot be proven. What’s worse, it cannot even be tested except by the measure of a man’s faith. Neil DeGrasse Tyson might phrase it like this, “the Universe doesn’t have to make sense to you.” Just believe. Despite what Carl Sagan and his contemporaries might demand of adherers to the scientific method, the entire heliocentric religion can only be explained with pseudo-science, just not the “old-time religion.” Make no mistake about it; the theory of gravity is Kabbalah through-and-through. According to Migene Gonzalex-Wippler, author of The Kabbalah & Magic of Angels, gravity “is equated with Tiphareth, the sixth sphere of the Tree of Life.”
Author Edward Hendrie sums it up like this: “Gravity is not only an attribute of the Jewish god, Ein Sof, it is actually one of the god’s of the Kabbalah, in its own right.”
I confess Kabbalah is an occultist religion I’ve taken a considerable interest in as of late. I guess I just want to know why our so-called understanding of modern astronomy and the most basic ideas in string theory today, as well as astrophysics, not forgetting Newton’s gravity, all seem to concur with Babylonian mysticism in so-much as they’re mirrored astonishingly with the Zohar and Kabbalistic texts of old. They’re certainly advertised as such. Specifically, in my pursuit of understanding Jewish mysticism and its necessary visage behind today’s establishment of Copernican and Darwinian Scientism, a deception which the Lord has gladly delivered me out of, I want to know why modern Christians, who are so hasty in dismissing God’s revelation of creation in the Bible, mocking the very notion that its intended as literal, are so eager to back up the Zohar’s literal account of it
If—according to the big bang theory—matter, space, and time all instantaneously collaborated in their formation, or “10” is the number for space-time in string theory, with “26” standing out as a requirement for mathematics in bosonic string theory, with both numbers agreeably forming the building blocks of the universe through “magic dimensions,” as modern theorists claim, in Kabbalah and modern science, how it is that medieval Jewish writers so splendidly divided truth from fantasy without knowing today’s mathematics or physics then, well, I guess I’m stumped—if modern scientists are truly “rediscovering” it, that is. And that’s the thing. How one perceives this, a fantastical retelling in the department of wishful thinking or coincidental and completely innocent discovery in the pursuit of truth; well, one’s personal conclusion changes everything.
My fellow brothers and sisters who have followed the Spirit’s prompting and returned to the Bible’s revelation of an enclosed cosmology will no doubt agree with me when I say the doctrine of Flat Earth forces all of us to take not just one step back. No-no, far more—we take any number of steps back to gain a fuller look at the panorama, perhaps in yet another hopeful attempt to seek out the promised curve of the Earth, and we’re astonished at what we see—astonished at how great this terrible delusion really, truly is, and how deep and far reaching in the pages of history it’s rooted. The deceit just keeps growing and growing with the continual expansion of our peripheral vision, the further back we stand. There’s simply no end to it.
I’m especially intrigued by Kabbalah’s teaching regarding “God’s retreat,” or emptying Himself from the cosmos by retracting infinite light, so as to make room for big-bang creation, and how the new spirituality of Scientism can match this to portray everything before us as a potential vessel for the enlightenment of divinity. After a while, Darwinian Evolution and the Babylonian religion and the Copernican globe, each apparently backed with these Kabbalah texts, all bleed into the same agenda—the Luciferian lie.
I realize now that talking about Kabbalah and Babylonian mysticism wasn’t my actual intent when sitting down to write this, nor was it the secret papers of Newton. So far as my reevaluation into astronomy and astrophysics has gone, now that I’ve decided to take my stand with a Holy Bible which outright opposes such beliefs, all of this, particularly my previous indoctrination into the very system by which I claimed to oppose, has produced more of a culture shock, if anything. If I never realized the extent to which Creationists fooled me into believing their pursuit of Science was a Biblical one, it’s simply because never in all my life could I nor did I wish to believe that my own church leaders would pull the wool over my eyes in either stance, be it a purposefully deceitful or subconscious decision on their part. I certainly didn’t set out on this Flat Earth quest considering either two as an option, not even in the back of my inner-skull, and yet here we are.
Now we peel the curtain of the great hypocrisy. I was instructed to align myself with creationists who willingly apply cosmic evolution into their teachings of Biblical astronomy, among other disciplines. I’d hear them talking about stars and planets being formed by the coalescing of cosmic gases or starlight traveling from quadrillions of miles away and somehow incorporating that belief-system into Genesis while simultaneously adding a young-earth time stamp for our approval, and convince myself that the very “Science” by which they were rationalizing was somehow a Biblical one. Quite frankly, it’s not.
This all goes back to my original question. I guess I just want to know why modern Christians, who are so hasty in dismissing God’s revelation of creation in the Bible, mocking the very notion that it’s intended as literal, are so eager to back up the Zohar’s literal account of it. Are we so arrogant as to claim we know more or better than God’s own testimony of Himself through creation, described by Moses, the prophets, scribes, poets, and Apostles, as to oppose it, or is it at all possible that, by skewing off the straight and narrow path in our solitary pursuit of quantifying what was once-hidden in creation, disclosures perhaps never intended to be found at all, it isn’t a better understanding of “God” that we’re actually discovering?
As a believer in the literal interpretations of Holy Writ, I admit I am not so different than Sir Isaac Newton. I too am a proponent of pseudoscience. And yet there can only be one truth, where the shape of creation is concerned. All other roads, apparently, lead to Planet Earth.
Science and the Spirit Mirror—Our Unending Honeymoon with Angels
KING ARTHUR HAD MERLIN AND QUEEN ELIZABETH DID TOO, only we know him today as Dr. John Dee—or the gift which keeps on giving. Not only was he a mover and shaker behind Britain’s Empirical rule, he was the inspiration for the character Doctor Faustus, Shakespeare’s Prospero, and being a spy for His Majesty, Ian Fleming even borrowed Dee’s signature, “007.” His students included Francis Bacon, promoter of the “scientific method,” and the astronomer Thomas Diggs, who believed the universe to be infinite. As the Queen’s “science” adviser, his duties included astronomer, mathematician, navigator, spy, cabalist, alchemist, and perhaps most important of all, celestial necromancer.
Dee once explained to the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II during a visit to Prague that he found no book which could teach him the truths he so longed for. Dee hoped communion with the angels would help him solve the mysteries of the heavens—certainly not as they were revealed by the Holy Ghost in the Bible, and therefore accepted everywhere by God-fearing men and women of the faith. My discerning reader should immediately take note of which angels formed the opinions of the modern day universe then—certainly not those who are obedient to the Lord Almighty. True servants of God, even our modern day scientists, which I am accused of dishonoring, will not willingly contradict the Spirit. And yet they do—openly, knowing the Christian is gullible in these matters. I know. I myself used to be one of them.
England could and would not partake as a contributor to modern Science without John Dee. Yet it is no secret that he was a mystic. As he read the Talmud, the heavens were opened, giving direct contradiction to Christian teaching—or the Doctrine of Flat Earth. Dee organized this new transcendence of knowledge, mathematics, optics, astrology, science, and navigation, through the only available avenue to him, a polished obsidian mirror by which the angels would in turn appear.
Occultist Edward Kelley and he were friends. Together they conversed in what they referred to as the Enochian language, which was taught to them directly through their stones of obsidian. It was while on tour in Poland, giving lectures on magic and alchemy to the aristocratic Elite, Kelley was told by his celestial informants that the two were to swap wives—which they did for a night. Nine months later, Dee would raise Kelley’s son as his own.
My reader will take note that Western Science derives from Hermetic thought and natural philosophy, a banner which it proudly waves to this day. John Dee was influenced by the two, as were the lot of them. He believed numbers formed the basis of all phenomena. The numerical value of his name, which he freely boasted in his writings, was 666. Bacon too was involved with the occult, but unlike Queen Elizabeth, who openly confided in it, her successor King James was not so appreciative. As such, mathematics could cypher a number and geometry could present symbols for truth. Using them repeatedly in cryptic ways was important ritually for the occults survival.
From Hermeticism, Dee drew the belief that man had the potential for divine power, which could be exercised through mathematics. His ultimate goal was to help bring forth—pay attention, discerning Christian—a unified world religion. The recent breach of the Protestants from the Catholics, which we affectionately refer to as the Reformation, was not exactly smiled upon by many, and recapturing “pure theology” of the ancients in Hermeticism could and would be accomplished through the iron fist of Scientism.
And yet this is not the story which we who grew up in the church were told. We have been cleverly diverted in thought by our own leaders. We have been sacked and blindfolded by the modern Creationist, who employs the very understanding of an infinite cosmos which magicians once conceived through angels and stones of obsidian. He proudly justifies his cause by pointing fingers at the Darwinist as the great corrupter of “God’s perfect gifting” to humanity, while obstinately overlooking the fact that what he knows first arrived through the Occultist.
It is a science which serves no other master than he who seeks to splinter our Bible of truth. Make no mistake about it, despite appearances; this is the church’s darkest hour. The congregation is held hostage by false doctrine, and we are, each one of us, in serious need of repentance.
I shall no doubt be accused again of dishonoring our great god-fearing Christian men of Scientism for penning this, as I often am. Then to you who refuse the complete Testimony of God concerning Himself and His Creation in the Holy Scripture—we call this the Doctrine of Flat Earth—all because you prefer confrontation with God Almighty rather than refusing the wisdom of the Sadducee and the Greek, I ask that you at least honor the unending honeymoon, this Scientific and technological Renaissance which you happily confide in, by acknowledging its forefathers.
The next time you pass a mirror, pause for a minute, flick the lights on and off in quick succession, and give thanks to it.
Immortality for All—Our Copernican Universe & the Worship of Pantheism
THE GULLIBLE CHRISTIAN WILL SIT WIDE-EYED AND CROSS-LEGGED, intently hinged upon every word of the astronomer, who has seemingly grown confused between his telescope and recent readings in Eastern mysticism as he amazes his hearers with tall-tales from the furthest reaches of our cosmic flea market. That poor gullible soul—I myself used to be one of them, not recognizing a bold faced lie when I saw it—convinces himself that the God of the Bible is somehow behind all of this, if only we can grasp the right verbiage, when in fact the astronomer has not confused the two—the telescope with his library. The Copernican model, with its promise of ascension to heaven, most certainly does arise from cosmological books, just not the Bible. And it leads us not to the true Creator, as we blindly convince ourselves of, but the oldest religion in the world, which as you likely already guessed began in the Garden—the humanists dream.
God is not the infinite cosmos, nor is His creation a manifestation of Him. Yet we are told by astrophysicists to “marvel at the remarkable symmetry and wonder” of our universe when observing the clusters of galaxies and invisible dark matter which supposedly fills the bulk of its open gaps—all of which proves nothing but collected data on a computer screen—and when stretching billions of light-years across from end-to-end, incredibly match the neurons in a mouse’s brain.
Similarly, NASA’s Spritzer space telescope informs us there is a stellar system made up of two intertwined chains just like a double helix in a DNA molecule, and stretching 80 lightyears in length. These most clever of deceptions, both the neurons of a mouse’s brain and the strand of our own DNA, effectively wrap themselves around an element of God’s truth and then distort them into a humanistic worship of the self.
We are expected to believe a black hole, which is nothing more than the fantastical ponderings self-created in a storytellers head, resembles the cell nucleus. Furthermore, a black hole’s event horizon—a sort of point of no return where the gravitational pull sucks objects into the black hole—also resembles the nuclear membrane, or so we are expected to believe. Physics will remind us that a cell is made up of molecules, and molecules made up of atoms, and atoms composed of a nucleus and electrons, which in turn revolve around the nucleus. Planets, we are conclusively led to believe, are electrons and the sun the nucleus, the atom being our solar system, with the galaxy being a molecule, and the entire universe a cell. The multitude of solar systems, so they conclude, makes up the remaining cells.
The universe as a whole, or so the greatest deception of this age goes, can grow just like a gigantic brain, with the firing of brain cells mirroring the expanding galaxies around us. The gullible Christian forsakes his Bible to embrace this, convincing himself that the mystical message of astronomy is somehow confused in the verbiage—that we couldn’t possibly be embracing what its bold-faced conclusions demand—that we are gods, every one of us.
Basically, as astrophysicists and astronomers seek to prove; our universe is one singular cell of many inside a gigantic living organism, all of which gives birth and then dies again. Everything small and large is interrelated as a whole, says both the gurus of Eastern Mysticism and our priests of Scientism. THE COSMOS IS ALIVE! And looking into the face of the Supreme Being—pay attention, gullible Christian—should and when he decide to reveal him or her or itself to us, is to see the Living Universe. He is us, our embodiment of light; and we are he, his vessels.
Let this be known to the man with discernment; God is not the universe, nor is the universe a manifestation of Him. And somewhere along the line, when the Word of God lost its Divine merit, our parents—as did their parents and grandparents before them—volunteered their children through a societal mush pot of delusional thinking, that we be handed a globe and led by the hands of strangers into the apostasy of pantheism.
A discerning Christian should find it strange indeed to learn that this laughable “space race” began in Russia during the adolescent years of Darwinism, years before the Wright Brothers even flew, and its dancing partner was trans-humanism. So it began with trans-humanism, and there it shall end as the capstone of Luciferian wisdom.
I introduce you to a man by the name of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, father of astronautic theory. Tsiolkovsky was also a mystic. His mentor was Nikolai Fedoror, a so-called Christian who openly advocated “immortality for all.” This would be accomplished, he claimed, through the pursuit of trans-humanism, whereas the crowning achievement of Evolution would be man’s union in his biological human condition with the technology which would ultimately seek to surpass him, thereby becoming one and the same, whereas intellect and physiology may increase until their end-means are met. Accordingly, where Fedoror’s vision was concerned, while achieving immortality through his biological and physiological union with technology was a worthy cause, that and the resurrection of all people who ever lived would prove two inseparable goals.
I refer to this as the Gospel of Ascension.
Eugenics, the same doctrine which embraced the holocaust and abortion clinics of many, has not been so easily forgotten. That and transhumanism flourish together and must remain together. Darwinism must have its supreme race, Lucifer must have his sacrifice, and our biological union with the mark is assuredly the long-awaited answer to both. If biology alone cannot perform the task, then the mark must.
It is here where we can recognize, if we have the eyes and ears for discernment, the promised Great Delusion of this age. We can see where it fermented, where it is soon arriving, and how it so easily enveloped us with its illustrious promises and Hollywood narrative. Perhaps the greater deception still is the mark to come. There’s this longstanding belief in the faith community that it will seem repulsive to the Elect when in fact the lie may be beautiful as any before us, as this globe delusion already proves to those of us who embrace the full unbroken Testimony of God concerning Himself—the Doctrine of Flat Earth. If they cannot deny the lie now, why will they deny it then?
What is this space race, my fellow discerning Christian, but a transfiguration of the soul through death, the cheating of sins’ consequence, a back-door approach to heaven if you will, apart from the necessary repentance which assuredly leads to God’s forgiveness through the atoning sacrifice of our Lord? Indeed, man has a longstanding history to desire the conquest of heaven by his own strength of mind rather than accepting the free gift of salvation through Yeshua Hamashiach our Creator and Lord. Surely, a discerning Christian must see that we’ve been lied to.
We have been lied to again and again and again and again. In fact there is no end to it—the lies. Yet in the midst of confusion—really, there is no end to it—some of us have been woken by the Spirit, like Lot and his family in Sodom before destruction, as a means to escape. And so also we must face the graver possibility, that not everyone will be rescued. Just as many of our brethren in Christ have been deceived from the beginning, and even now choose to continue not the first lie seeded centuries ago, but the lie within the lie within the lie into tomorrow’s lie and well into next week’s lie to the following lie until the very last lie is told, so too will many willingly take the mark, if only because the lie seems beautiful and innocent to them or otherwise not worth looking the fool for refuting.
Perhaps Mark Twain said it best. “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”
“As Above, So Below”—Occultist Knowledge Isn’t Hidden, We’ve Been Active Participants All Along
PERHAPS THE GREATEST HYPOCRISY OF THIS AGE can only be realized once we wake from our terrible delusion and, fully lathered and soaped-up—having removed the filth of the globe from our pores—we observe the so-called man of God wearing the spectacles of a “Creationist,” who pampers us with his “opposition to Darwinism,” as if the two are pitching their tents separately in camps of darkness and light. And yet the passing sun, which casts the light of God’s Word down upon the Earth so firmly fixed below our feet, transparently reveals whom Science has chosen as its dancing partner—and it wasn’t God. His partner was, and still is, the mystery schools of Greece and ancient Babylon.
This is the true brilliance behind the many villainous men whom we have been warned to keep away from. They are never identified in a practically threatening way as someone we might possibly know or confide our faith in where the public forum of wealth, power, and influence is concerned. Except these faceless men, as reputation would have them, whoever they might truly be, are assigned the odd attributes of having attained occultist knowledge, and are even insinuated to be hiding in the cracks and gutters of a cockroach home rather than plain sight, where we might identify them and hang them from a noose. Children beware, come Halloween night! This is their true brilliance; that the warning is first advertised by those very men themselves, who in reality are never lurking but always wickedly ascending to the heights of heaven, having convinced us to bare our trust in them, take their hands, and follow their guidance into the very hell and brimstone utopia in which they seek to create and ultimately enslave us with.
In case you haven’t met, I introduce to you a man by the name of Hermes Trismegistus—father of Hermetism. The saintly Augustine falsely attributed him as being a wise pagan prophet who foresaw the coming of Christianity, though he most certainly was a pagan. Ralph Waldo Emerson would agree with Augustine, as Hermes proved to be a Transcendentalists dream, though it was Thomas Aquinas who exalted his defective affection for Hermetism well beyond apostasy by attributing his secret occultist knowledge to the Trinity. These are strange beliefs indeed, considering Hermes and his later school of Hermetism, which infiltrated Christianity in Alexandria from the very beginning, claimed hidden knowledge of the entire universe, a self-appointed wisdom mainly divided up into three parts—alchemy, astrology, and theurgy. They are all three recipes for performance witchcraft.
Should I believe the renowned Scientists of our modern faith—all of whom will remain unmentioned here—claiming the goodness in Enlightenment Science (but of Darwinism, beware! Beware!) by fingering such God-fearing men as Sir Isaac Newton, proof of its goodness! They will sadly direct you to his wealth of theological writings, nothing more than a smoke and mirrors distraction from the Hermetic Science and Kabbalistic texts lovingly clung to his bosom and which attributed to the discoveries of the hidden ideas he sought to expose and later successfully promoted—and which our Copernican “Creationist” brethren uphold as the attributes of God discovered. By accepting his premise of gravity, that mystical force which cannot be tested, neither understood nor explained by our most exalted Elite but demands our full unfledged faith in order for the logic of the globe to remain, we each become active members with the ritual of ascension. In short, Isaac Newton was an occultist who happened to observe an apple fall. To call gravity a hoax would be an injustice to the Hermetic principles of magic which it seeks to evoke.
The great music and art of the Renaissance which I once so publicly praised side-saddles the Judeo-Christian faith with the pagan, all attributing itself to the explosion of Hermetic, mainly the “true-theology” of Hermetism, whereas all religions were purported to have been given by God to man in antiquity. By convincing us witchcraft can only be found among the fictional cauldrons of a Shakespearean tragedy or that we need not venture any further beyond the Ouija board in order to keep clear of the reality behind it, we have been fed a cleverly deceptive partial-truth by the spoonful in order to create the most clever and wicked diversion. The greatest pronunciation of witchcraft is in the stage performance, on the television if you will, not the cauldron, whereas the audience participates by their very belief in what is being acted out.
They have been seeking to manipulate nature all along—the Darwinist and the Copernican. Anyone participating in Hermetic Science, nature in the end must be manipulated. We are not instructed by God to manipulate anything. So too has the kabbalah of astronomy been seeking to manipulate the heavens and hide the goodness of God. If there be a Manifest Destiny in all of this, NASA receives the ribbon for overachievers. All that is attributed to the long dreaded New World Order and Mystery Babylon religion with the advent of post-modernism has been functioning healthy and strong since the beginning, as in the very beginning. The Beast isn’t coming. It’s been here right in front of our face. And I’m sick of it.
I’m sick of the lies. I’m sick of the arrogance. I’m sick of the worship of wisdom and knowledge and wealth and education and celebrity-status and pride. I’m sick of the ritualistic magic which I am expected to participate in. I’m sick of the narrative and Hollywood and the scripted MSM. I’m sick of the willing blindness in my own Christian camp. I’m sick and tired of those who convince themselves Yeshua is a part of this. I’m sick of this adulterous love affair with the beast system. I’m sick of it.
To my Lord I ask—Come Yeshua Hamashiach, come soon—and end this present darkness once and for all.
“Or Else the Silver Cord Be Loosed”—the Astral Projection of a Space Walk & the ISS Is Its Temple
“THE SILVER CORD” IS THE LANGUAGE OF MYSTICS, for we see that it is a link between two bodies, the astral and physical. During astral projection—the act of separating one’s consciousness from their physical self—the cord grants assurance to its projector that he will not wander so far from his body as to lose sight of it. Should he do so, wander inconsolably that is, the silver chord will most assuredly act as a rubber band and retract him right back into the body. It is the spirit body’s lifeline to the physical body the same way that our umbilical cord is our lifeline to our mother’s body during gestation. To separate from the silver cord is to die. If the cord breaks, then the separation is irreversible. In such an event, it is a “permanent astral projection” which cannot be undone.
So too, in a likewise manner, must the astronaut wear his silver cord, for “space” is also the language of mystics.
My reader will assuredly understand by this point that when I speak of “space,” I am referring to two things. Firstly, the deception, for the Bible makes no mention of space, nothing more than the firmament, which separates us from a celestial body of water, and most gloriously heaven itself above our heads. It is ironic indeed that the space-walk takes place in a tank of water, where bubbles frequently rise, and can even be seen doing so on camera. It is in outer space, or low earth orbit, we are expected to believe, where astronauts Luca Parmitano and Tim Kopra, having left the “underwater” ISS on two separate occasions for spacewalks of their own, almost drowned. We are rest assured by NASA that this will never happen again, as astronauts are now thoroughly equipped with snorkel gear when venturing out into the inhospitable vacuum, where puddles of water are waiting to pounce upon and ultimately strangle them.
Secondly, and this is perhaps the most important truth, the reader should invariably understand my position by now, that NASA is and has been from its very conception far more than a deception of Science. It is nothing more than a taxpayer funding for the occult, whereas the worship of Satan may be played out by his Masonic disciples. The gullible citizens of its sponsoring country and throughout the world are invited to participate in the televised worship service. By watching the witchcraft played out, and simply by believing in it, they are most certainly adding validity to the performance.
Astral projection is essentially a back-alley expression of witchcraft—the Yogic tradition of transcendental meditation also embraces it—whereas the astral traveler can choose to explore this world while leaving his body behind or in a like manner, explore worlds beyond our own. How many of these worlds there are throughout the occults various branches of thought is a matter of great debate, but it seems clear that there is at least a plane that overlaps the physical world consisting of the energetic or subtle bodies of all that exists in this world. Secondly there is an underworld, where chthonic spirits reside alongside the spirits of the dead. And lastly, there is an overworld, or plane of light, which is inhabited by “The Shining Ones”—gods, angels, and other etheric beings.
The astronaut’s career is focused upon transcendence into the overworld so that he might perhaps live out the promises of The Shining Ones. As he leaves his transport behind, just as in astral projection, the silver cord allows his astral person not to wander so far that he cannot find his way back home to his physical person.
So too we are told that the devotee to the act of astral projection will build unto himself a temple on his or her frequented astral plane. He may wish, we are told, to create a place where he might relax, worship his gods, cast spells, and perform divination or simply entertain guests.
The ISS is that temple. And it functions in all of these manners.
Once again we are presented with the bold-faced allegory of the mystics, being man’s transcendence from death, and most assuredly by his own free will, through the exploration and conquest of space. This is the author’s contention, anyhow. I am quite certain many of my readers will agree.
“6 Or ever the silver cord be loosed, or the golden bowl be broken, or the pitcher be broken at the fountain, or the wheel broken at the cistern. 7 Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.” Ecclesiastes 12:6-7 (KJV)
The oldest known reference to “the silver cord” can be found with Solomon. Strange though, since the opening and closing of Holy Canon, from first to last and everything contained between, is our story concerning God’s descent to meet us here on broken Earth, to redeem that very Earth and restore it anew, and ultimately bestow the free gift of salvation to all who believe in the atoning sacrifice of His Son, Yeshua Hamashiach, on the cross, and His swift resurrection from the tomb.
The silver cord and bowl spoken of in Ecclesiastes also promise certain death, but not in the manner which every other religion or government institution under the governing reins of Satan would have it. Most likely the bowl was used as an oil lamp for light, suspended by the chord. Dying is compared to the breaking of the chord, whereas the bowl violently falls and shatters. The flame is extinguished. Never will it light the room again. Similarly, if the pitcher and the pulley which lets it down into the well should break, no more can water be drawn. The functionality of life has ended. Death has conquered. Man returns to dust, his Spirit unto God who gave it. There is no hope of Salvation or eternity apart from a second birth, which is the soul united with a resurrected body—an act which Yeshua Hamashiach referred to as being born again.
Martin Luther said it like this,
“And ye, in putting them [the departed souls] in heaven, hell and purgatory, destroy the arguments wherewith Christ and Paul prove the resurrection… And again, if the souls be in heaven, tell me why they be not in as good a case as the angels be? And then what cause is there of the resurrection?”
The invitation remains for the soul who has yet to give his life to the Lord. I shall present it now and have little doubt as to my intention in presenting it later. The Bible makes this truth abundantly clear. He who refuses the free gift of Salvation through Yeshua Hamashiach, but rather attempts it on his own, this is the closest to heaven or the furthermost reaches of space he’ll ever be—in a NASA pool. There is no one who has ascended to our Father in heaven but Yeshua our Lord.
He alone holds the keys to life and death. When conquering death, our Lord was born again into an eternal and glorious resurrection. By this we can know with full assurance that His atoning sacrifice was sufficient to the Father and that we too who bind Him closely in our hearts will rise at His second coming.
He is most certainly returning soon to reclaim His creation. Mystics and occultists and astronauts be warned.
“Simulation Theory” + New Mathematics & Science = Same Tiresome Damnable Lie
PLATO NEVER OWNED AN APPLE COMPUTER. Suffice to say, had Steve Jobs been around to dialogue with Socrates in 5th Century Athens, Plato likely would have subscribed to the Simulation Theory. Is it not quite unlike Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” in his philosophy of Forms? For Plato, Forms (or ideas) represent the most accurate reality. Forms are the essence of various objects. So too the Simulation Theory invokes ghostly images and projections from a level of reality so far above our own that reality itself is currently unobtainable by mortal man. True reality, accordingly, rises beyond space and time.
University of London physicist David Bohm, a protégé of Einstein’s and one of the world’s most respected quantum physicists, worked in the field of plasma physics during the 1950’s. He first noted that in plasmas (ionized gases) the particles stopped acting as individuals and began behaving as though they were part of a larger and interconnected whole. Continuing the demolition of reality, which Einstein’s theory of relativity had already taken a sledgehammer to, Bohm was instrumental in teaching that the tangible reality of our everyday lives is really only an illusion, like one massively interconnected holographic image. At the subquantum level, location ceases to exist. Physicists call this property “nonlocality.” Because all points in space become equal to all other points in space, it is therefore pointless to speak of anything as being separate from anything else. Everything is interconnected—and an illusion.
Philosopher Nick Bostrom first popularized Simulation Theory with his 2003 paper, “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?” In it he suggests members of an advanced post-human society with vast computing power beyond our own may be running simulations of their ancestors. That would be us. Either we are the simulations, or we shall soon simulate ourselves—which we may still do but also may have already done. Say that again and let your head spin.
So, has human society already run its course and are we living in a simulation? SpaceX co-founder Elon Musk seems to think so. In fact, an entire swath of technologists and physicists, many emanating from California’s Silicon Valley, believe their sim theory will be proved. “There’s a billion to one chance,” Musk says, “we’re living in base reality.”
For Plato, Forms (or ideas) represent the most accurate reality. Forms are the essence of various objects. For instance, there are countless tables and chairs in the world. But the Form of table-ness and chair-ness is at the core of every table and chair in the world. The higher world of Forms is the essence of all of them, transcended to our own existence—we are the world of substances—and also the essential basis for all reality. One might understand it in this light. There is nothing which exists in our perceived reality, not a chair, not a table, nor a computer, had it not first been passed down from the highest mountaintop of reality.
Or one might consider it like this. If mankind is able to design a computer program, it’s only because a greater and far superior computer program has already been designed. Every existing computer program, both past and future, is but a shadow of the real thing—the higher Form. If the computer advances in our reality, so too has the advancement have already been made. Therefore, if we are able to simulate, it is proof enough that a simulation has already been designed, perhaps even billions of them, and there is a chance that we ourselves are simulated.
“Forty years ago we had Pong–two rectangles and a dot. That’s where we were. Now forty years later, we have photorealistic, 3D simulations with millions of people playing simultaneously and it’s getting better every year. And soon we’ll have virtual reality, we’ll have augmented reality,” said Musk. “If you assume any rate of improvement at all, then the games will become indistinguishable from reality.”
Rich Terrile of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory says, “Soon there will be nothing technical standing in the way of making machines that have their own consciousness….If one progresses at the current rate of technology a few decades into the future, very quickly we will be a society where there are artificial entities living in simulations that are much more abundant than human beings.”
And given Nick Bostrom’s other possibility—human civilizations inevitable ceiling of technology—Musk says we’d better hope that we’re already a simulation. “Either we’re going to create simulations that are indistinguishable from reality, or civilization will to cease to exist. Those are the two options.”
While one might suspect Bostrom’s inspiration derives from a recent viewing of The Matrix movies, we need only look a little ways beyond that to Russian cosmist and mystic Nikolai Fyodorovich Fyodorov (1829–1903). As a founding father of the space race, he was an orthodox Christian apostate who advocated the perfection of the human race through transhumanism and space colonization, all of which would include not only physical immortality, but the resurrection of the dead—as in our ancestors—using scientific methods.
Pay attention to what dribble Hollywood is pushing out—they’re all over this like gravy on potatoes—and then let us consider if this is something that we as Christians should align with. The lie is everywhere. Hollywood endorses it—Simulation Theory, that is, and I’m out. So often a Christian believes it is in his job description to act as an intellectual cowboy of sorts. He attempts to sight God in pagan creativity, including the Hollywood narrative. He will lasso the wild indiscreet imaginations of the humanist mind in order to neatly “Christianize” his views within the boundaries of a church chorale, all so that it may be discussed and dissected among his peers, or perhaps simply harnessed for his own personal and justifiable amusement. A Christian needs only hold up his Bible to discern the most common of themes. In the end it’s all the same—slightly different spin on reality, perhaps, but the lie is ever-present and far-reaching as always. So why is Dr. Chuck Missler getting involved with the holographic universe?
Quite similar to Plato’s Forms (or ideas), which represent the most accurate reality over the lesser physical, quantum physicist David Bohm referred to this deeper level of reality as the “implicate” (enfolded) order, with our level of existence being the “explicate” (or unfolded) order. Dr. Chuck Missler seems to think this view is not entirely inconsistent with the Biblical presentation of the physical world being a subordinate to the spiritual. Everything, according to Missler, is relative, because the dimension of space is nothing more than a hologram.
No, Dr. Chuck Missler, this is not Biblical. It reeks of Gnostic thought. The spirit is not superior to the flesh. We are not in dire need of departing from these corrupted bones in order to transcend to some greater reality, nor is the physical world a subordinate. That is not the Biblical narrative by any means. God will dwell with us. Heaven will be here on Earth with us. Everything we can see and touch and smell is to be redeemed. We’re not going anywhere.
The Christian always seeks to “Christianize” the pagan belief—including mathematics and Science—as if declaring God is behind each discovered perversion he will somehow convince the humanist of his wrongness without having to dismiss the very perversion which pulled him away from God’s truth in the first place—as if the Bible was right in explaining it. Nick Bostrom and his many humanist colleagues, including the well-financed horsepower behind Hollywood, have already let us in on who is behind it. Bostrom states: “It (Sim Theory) suggests naturalistic analogies to certain traditional religious conceptions.” Another words, there is a higher being, but it is not the Christian God. It is some version of us.
Scientism’s official enforcer for Globe Earth, Neil deGrasse Tyson, has stated not only his belief in Simulation Theory but, with his usual air of religious mockery, that its architect is probably some middle-aged man in his mom’s basement.
If a Christian truly believes we are living in a holographic universe, as Dr. Chuck Missler claims, one must wonder why Creation matters. What does the shape of the Earth matter? This includes Evolutionary Globe-Earth proponents as well. Why fight for the globe or even Flat Earth if measurement itself is as collapsible as the tiniest atom? What does religion matter? What is consciousness and morality and who is to say our many video game creations within our own personal video game is not their own reality? What if history doesn’t actually exist and we are the only generation who ever lived, confined forever to some Samsara recycling program doomed to reboot and repeat over and over again?
If all we are is coding—pixilation rather than dust in the wind, as the atheist once claimed—does anything truly matter? A proponent of Simulation Theory will ultimately conclude everything he can see and touch and smell around him is nothing more than base rules for perceived reality—which he is free, in the very least, to disobey and attempt to break free of. Who is he accountable to—the architect? Even now, according to Musk, there are billionaires engaged in breaking us out of the simulation.
Where this is heading, I cannot say. But one thing I am confident of, fellow Christian. If this indeed should climax with the days of Noah, one thing I can be absolutely certain of, and you should be too; “the architect” who will be revealed behind this grand show of force in the religion of Scientism will be anyone but God.
When Not to Speak Thy Mind—Brain-Computer Interface & the Mark of the Beast Has Got Nothing on the Amish
CRITICISM HAS OVERSHADOWED OUR SHARED PORTRAIT of the Amish for generations. The Great Commission commands us to go throughout the entire world preaching the Gospel. This, their Christian neighbor demands, the Amish have willingly failed at—as if the bulk of Christianity has made better use of the call. And yet it can be argued that the Amish didn’t forsake us. Rather, they held fast to what is true, and by their own consent, the world moved on without them. For this transgression against man’s self-declared renaissance in science, literature, and the arts they are rarely forgiven. It should be promptly noted that the Amish, originating from the Swiss Anabaptists and, being the very last vestige of the Great Reformation—in a way; historically hold to the literal promises of God’s Testimony. Ask an Amish gentleman about the shape of creation and he’ll likely tell you the Earth is flat.
It is a strange expectation that the Amish should exchange the very lifestyle which has satisfied mankind since the beginning of history for a technological imprisonment overshadowed by the beast government of John’s Revelation, thereby causing them by association to be indebted to it. And it lies. Concerning the shape of the Earth, our government lies to each and every one of us. This is no secret to the Amish. They have every reason to separate the authority of their church from the state, but none to doubt God’s Testimony, or His enduring goodness. Yet they are criticized to no end for dismissing any notion that our current technological renaissance is a “gift from God,” while their Christian accusers rarely exhibit the slightest understanding as to why they choose simplistic sovereignty over a complex spider web of technological enslavement. People everywhere have allowed the beast to convince them that unpractical scientific theory outweighs their better sensory judgement and they live on a resulting planet. The Amish know better.
Like discarded fashion, for those of us who have attempted to keep up with the trending spin of the globe, there is seemingly always a new technological era to be dressed in. The Amish decided over a century ago against electrical housewares, though now we, not quite unlike the Amish before us, find ourselves having to face another unparalleled decision in human history. Will we speak our mind and plug our brain into the machine?
If Elon Musk, chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX, has it his way, we are expected to do just that. His latest start-up company, Neuralink, is centered on creating brain-computer interface and neuro lace devices that can be implanted within our skull—inserted, he says, through the jugular vein—all in an effort to merge humans with the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence.
Such an endeavor is being advertised as our next stage of evolution. And if we don’t do it—if we choose not to evolve beyond the image which God has created us in, then artificial intelligence promises to sail right past us on the food chain. To this notion Musk says, “I don’t love the idea of being a house cat, but what’s the solution? I think one of the solutions that seems maybe the best is to add an AI layer, a third digital layer that could work well and symbiotically with the rest of your body.”
“We are currently bandwidth limited,” he adds. “We have a digital, tertiary-self in the form of our e-mail capabilities like computers, phones, applications—we are effectively superhuman, but we are extremely bandwidth constrained in that interface between the cortex and the tertiary digital form of yourself.”
Another words, “If we can create a high-bandwidth neural interface with your digital self, then you’re no longer a house cat.”
The ability to hack the brain has been a subject of futurism and cyberpunk science-fiction for decades, including “Ghost in the Shell” and “The Matrix.” Entrepreneur Bryan Johnson, founder of the online payments company Braintree, which he sold to PayPal in 2013 for $800 million, invested $100 million from that sell-off into a startup company called Kernel, all in hopes of bringing film fiction to reality. With his team of committed neuroscientists and software engineers, Johnson plans to “enhance human cognition” through direct interface with computing devices by upgrading our brains. Think faster, smarter, and hardwired.
The dominoes are falling. Facebook has announced its own “brain mouse” for augmented reality. With social media, our brain will function much as our hands would when controlling cursers. Regina Gugan, head of Facebook’s Building 8 control group, said, “What if you could type directly from your brain… with the speed and flexibility of voice and the privacy of text?” In only a few short years people will be writing everything from text messages to novels by thoughts alone—and probably ordering food too. Then again, computers will soon be preforming those tasks anyways—writing bestsellers and ordering our food, that is. As of this writing, developers at Facebook’s Artificial Intelligence Research have already completed A.I. “chat box” robots which have reportedly conversed in human language and negotiated human trade among each other.
Even DARPA spent $60 million in 2016 developing an implantable neural interface. The project, which is part of former president Barack Obama’s “BRAIN INITIATIVE,” wants a device that can read 1 million neurons simultaneously and stimulate at least 100,000 neurons in the brain. Its implant is expected to be wireless, the size of a nickel, and ready for deployment in only a few years.
The chip is coming at us full speed. Businesses are already requiring it of their employees. It’s being implanted in the hand, just as the Apostle John said it would (Revelation 13:16). And we have very little idea how far this is going to go—how many months, years, or even decades we and our children have left, thirsting and hungering for relief against this coming trans-humanist nightmare, perhaps even succumbing to starvation in the streets, before God finally puts a stop to it. I don’t know about you, but guys like me are going the way of the caveman—and willingly, because I’m not choosing to co-evolve my inner-skull with the computer. I’ve already made that decision. Nothing of technological value is getting implanted within my flesh. Not in my head, not in my hands, not even in my rectum. It ends here.
People are going to be lining up for a brain-computer interface, smart dust, neural lace, and whatever other chip invention they’re rolling out on the belt. Masayoshi Son, the second richest man in Japan, is investing $100 billion to build a computer chip with an IQ of 10,000. Expect college degrees to be worthless currency for those of us who forsake such a god-like IQ. These neural chips are even being designed to store memories for us. This godless generation will undress their mind, exchanging the most cherished endowment of privacy for worldly comfort. Unfortunately, as these things often go, technological advancements only begin on a volunteer basis. And we Christians know where it’s ending.
The Mark of the Beast is almost upon us.
Because the Amish made their decision long ago, they have a sleek advantage over us late arrivals, for now. As a society, they are self-sufficient. We are not. They don’t need a chip implant. We do. When the cash flow stops, the only way the beast government is forcing them into submission is by bulldozing their farms down. Perhaps that will happen. In the end, once society has evolved beyond their own claim at humanity, they too will have to make a decision, if only to keep their heads from rolling. But make no mistake about it; the day of decision is coming. For me, the boundary marker is set.
Certainly, when we pronounce, “Enough is enough!” and unplug from this Matrix, our impact on society—our ability to carry out the Great Commission—will be severely handicapped, if not made completely impotent. It is why, in that day, we should remember the Amish. They have been fulfilling the Great Commission all along, if only in the best way they know how. By “keeping themselves unspotted by the world (James 1:27),” as James the brother of Yeshua requires, their testimony is made known, and their light goes out to the entire world.
“Peace! Peace! They Say, Where There Is No Peace”—Dr. Strange, Marvel Comics & the Religion of Haight-Ashbury In Defiance of the Second Coming of Christ
EVIDENCE OF A HIGH-RANKING CONSPIRACY against our LORD’s return is conspicuous to the Christian who carefully examines the Apostle John, particularly when he writes: “And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army (Revelation 19:19).” The one event which ultimately promises to unite the entire world into a singular rank of battle, the United States alongside the Russian Federation, backed by their assortments of allied and axis friends in the UN, is not an invasion of fictional Hollywood aliens, but the imposing crowning ceremony of our LORD, Yeshua Hamashiach.
As we near this certain event it will be required of us—we who long to stand behind the ranks of He who sits upon the horse and His angels—that we endure surmounting hostility. Our very path shall be a gauntlet of malicious tidings, with malnourished eyes always pressed upon us. The conscious of sinful man will surely demand social insubordination against such cause, perhaps even passing into law hopes of craftily defying it, particularly the mere recognition of any promised appearance of the risen Son of Man. And the church, which has lost the culture war against western civilization and now flails its wings like a flightless chicken in dire hopes of garnishing favor with the very world which rejects its tenets, will predictably shake its head at those of us who fervently seek His face among the clouds. “A loving god would not—No, he could not, interfere in the pluralistic affairs of our good natured world.” With these words our counterfeit church will castrate us. “Our prosperity must endure without His mingling!” Simply put, we will be an embarrassment to the Days of Noah apostates in power.
In the face of apostasy the church has done little to nothing to stop the humanist parade, a centuries-old line-up of festivities which has obstinately exchanged its address from a FLAT to globular earth, except to join in with the trends rather than to arrest them. The church in essence, by contextualizing its message of discipleship and daily living, has become the culture it once attempted to convict. Ironically, the apostates have converted us. The church’s abandonment first of the Bible’s cosmogony, followed by its interwoven structure, has cheapened our faith—even retarded it so that a typical mainstream worship service, with its colorful displays of lights and irreverent bray of guitars, deviates only slightly from the Haight-Ashbury religion it willingly derives from. A Christian is only able to live out the worldview he has been taught, and for the most part we have become what Yeshua once warned against, saltiness without flavor.
No wonder youth pastors induct their teenage youth into the cult of Hollywood, allowing for frequented “church outings” to the public arena of entertainment in hopes that the message of Jesus can be found in the illusion of a large-screened digital projection rather than in the understanding of their own spiritual heritage. As part of Disney’s masterfully maneuvered stronghold over the ticketholder, its cinematic universe of Marvel has fused together a cosmogony as tightly wound as its comic counterparts. Among the superheroes of Marvel Comics, evolution abounds. Furthermore, the transhumanist implementation of mortal man accelerates a better understanding of one’s self. In short, the Marvel universe is not Christian, nor will Yeshua be found in its age-old deception. He is not Iron Man, neither the patriotic Captain America, nor the pagan-god Thor.
Contrarily, Marvel’s current and ongoing cinematic storyline, which details the coming threat of an evil sentient being, namely the character Thanos, and who is bent on enslaving humanity to his rule upon arrival, is difficult to be seen as an allegory for Satan. The Prince of the power of the air already rules the Earth. But Yeshua, who is not a celebrated figure in Hollywood, is soon returning. This we can be certain of. Perhaps the imposing threat of an intergalactic menace throughout the greater interwoven narrative of Hollywood hits closer to the doorstep of Revelation 19:19—the kings who assemble for battle against the King of Kings—than the Christian, in his warped pagan education, is willing to give credit for. And when it comes to Marvel, it is up to the Nephilim, “the mighty men who were of old, the men of renowned (Genesis 6:4),” or the sons of God, to stop Him.
It could be said that Steve Ditko and Stan Lee’s original Dr. Strange comics were a considerable contributor, though a mostly-unacknowledged back-seat driver at best, behind the developing hippie counterculture. Throughout the 1960’s university students took drugs and discussed humanist philosophy among a cauldron of blended religions, particularly Eastern mysticism, all in an effort to “expand their minds.” The pages of a typical Dr. Strange comic would drip with the Great Deception: flavors of Salvador Dali, mysticism, black magic, the occult, astral projection, alternate realities and dimensions, Egyptian and Sumerian mythology, and the study of dreams, all of which enhanced their own psychedelia.
Science-fiction writer Ross Rocklynne was staying with his two sons in the Haight-Ashbury district during November of 1966, one of whom was attending San Francisco State at the time, and admittedly based his short story “Chez Witch” off his experiences in what he referred to as a semi-hippie apartment, with the like-minded sort always coming and going. Concerning the 12-page narrative that he clapped on a typewriter there, he said, “The older son handed me a stack of Marvel comics and remarked, incredibly, that Stan Lee and what he was saying was part of the religion of the Berkeley Haight-Ashbury scene. I was entranced with The Hulk, with Prince Namor of Atlantis, with The Fantastic Four, with Doctor Strange, the Mighty Thor, and others. I lay on the bed face closed to the floor and read and glutted myself in leisure.”
In his 1968 biographical narrative, “The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test,” author Tom Wolfe gave similar credit to drug enthusiast Ken Kasey, who in turn had authored “One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest” in 1962. Kasey and his Merry Pranksters held LSD gatherings around San Francisco’s bay area, including Haight-Ashbury, and according to Wolfe, he would often accommodate his trips with the latest issue of Dr. Strange.
If a Christian utilizes a crucifixion device as a symbol for his salvation, notably as it relates to Yeshua Hamashiach’s atoning sacrifice by becoming sin for us and taking our place on the cross, then the symbol of the counterculture peace-loving hippie has much to say of its followers, particularly the cross which it openly opposes.
To the Nazi it is called a “todesune,” or death rune. For the Saracen of the middle-ages it represents a broken cross, a raven’s claw, and a witch’s foot, all calling cards of Satan. For the Hindu, the downward “V” is a mystical character for “Aum,” a sacred word which, once pronounced in repetition, is said to awaken the power of Brahma at the base of the spine. Pagan sorcerers, especially in Germanic tribes, included it in their ceremonies. For Anton LaVey, founder of the Church of Satan, it is the background of his altar. Emperor Nero, regularly employing the downward fork to represent a broken cross or broken Jew, crucified the Apostle Peter on one. As such church history, conscious of these matters, has referred to it as a “Neronic cross.”
I am speaking of the hippie’s protest friendly “peace sign,” which lives on even today in our intellectual language. For author Rudolph Koch, in “The Book of Signs,” the downward pointing fork implies “the death of man,” while the circle surrounding it indicates “the total death of all people.” And while Gerald Holtom’s modern day re-creation of the age-old symbol is well documented, intended to represent hand-held flag symbols (or semaphores) of an N and D, representative of “nuclear disarmament,” (I see no reason why Gerald Holtom should not receive the benefit of the doubt,) Bertrand Russell is without excuse. As one well informed of its occultist lifespan, and furthermore being an open supporter of communism, the man who first brought it to America proclaimed its message with clarity. For Russell it reads: peace without God.
In light of this, when one digs five decades back beyond the historical revisionism of the mythological carefree hippie portrayed in the media, and the comic book culture which helped to create it, the words of the Prophet Jeremiah should be made immediately clear. “They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace. Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? Nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time that I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the LORD (Jeremiah 6:14-15)”
The true Christian knows full-well that peace, effectual and lasting peace, can only be embedded within the hearts of every man, woman, and child when our King of Kings arrives in the clouds. He is a deathly threat to the Haight-Ashbury and materialist globe religion. The new age man believes sin is simply the ignorance of one’s personal divinity. He believes the major problem of mankind is in his ignorance, specifically the Christian belief which has sought to inform and convince him otherwise—that if truth be told, we are all indeed divine. Yeshua is nothing more than an avatar, one of many gods who’ve come and gone with the breeze, perhaps to remind us of our ultimate potential, and therefore completely understood by his own disciples who wrote of Him. According to the New Age man, salvation involves personal enlightenment, not the cross, mainly release from the darkness of our own ignorance, which the upside-down fork can apparently help to deliver. Yeshua threatens all of this. He threatens to topple the self-declared evolution of man. Yes, the New Age man, whose eyes are firmly fixed on the crowning achievement of evolution, his own immortality and the resurrection of all mankind through the technological craftsmanship of transhumanism; Yeshua’s upheaval among future human events not only threatens his own impossible awakening, but most importantly, he threatens to cut short the arrival of Satan’s long-promised Age of Aquarius and its shining capitol city, Mystery Babylon, when mankind will attain their ultimate absorption into the impersonal godhead—or so the New Age belief goes.
In one of Dr. Strange’s earliest and most inspirational counterculture-shaping storylines, Stephen Strange essentially meets God, aka Sise-Neg, a 31st-century sorcerer of sorts who travels back through time in order to enhance and solidify his god-status. While he does succeed in ultimately destroying the Universe, once arriving at the beginning of time; rather than creating a new one in his own image, as was Sise-Neg’s original plan, thanks to Dr. Strange he is convinced to create the exact same evolutionary Universe again, just not in God’s image. Dr. Strange will then witness the Big Bang’s commencement. During one memorable segment, Strange acts as one of the three angels of Genesis who travels into Sodom alongside the villainous god-figure, Sise-Neg, in hopes that he might stop him from destroying both cities, the other being Gomorrah. In this attempt our hero fails. Sodom and Gomorrah are destroyed, as the God of the Bible would have it, and here, through Stephen Strange’s eyes, we are expected to witness the Christian God as our Marvel superheroes perceive Him. To them, the Judeo-Christian God is evil.
If such a possibility were true, that Hollywood wasn’t just a highly-budgeted monument celebrating the wishful thinking of godless humanism and its storylines were somehow manifested as true, then it shouldn’t be too hard for the Christian, unless cognitive dissonance and decades of apostate indoctrination has the better of him (which certainly may be the case), to envision his plight of safety behind Yeshua Hamashiach’s ranks, while our superheroes of the Haight-Ashbury religion—Thor, The Hulk, Iron Man, The Fantastic Four, The X-Men, Captain America, and not forgetting Dr. Strange—stands in defense, with the kings of the Earth to back them.
Indeed, their threat has finally arrived. And they are in opposition of Him.
“Childhood’s End”—Arthur C. Clarke’s ‘Three Laws’ In Light of the Science Delusion
THE UNITED STATES AND RUSSIA ARE BOTH ENGAGED WITH THE DAWNING DAYS of the space race. It is still the late 20th century, and the only obstacle which can hinder either opposing party from physically manning space, by no small coincidence, does in fact occur. Monster alien spacecrafts peacefully intercept their planned flights, hovering over every major metropolis in the world. It is by the will and to the satisfaction of the majority of the human race that their “Overlords,” as they’re soon known by all, have secured a true Utopia on Earth, through UN participation no less, and with a centralized one world government to show for it. An entire fifty years will pass before these Overlords fulfill a promise first made at their arrival. They reveal their true forms. Indeed, they are the devils of the Bible.
We are living in a science-fiction novel. Author Arthur C. Clarke—he and his genre contemporaries, saw to that. If any of the above plot sounds familiar, or should it accredit merit as the slightest possible outcome in our future, it’s because Clarke gave creative license to it. Science-fiction is little more than an imaginative set of ideas which begin in the head, and though they have yet to exist, soon will—not in a book or projector, but in our very perception of reality. I am summarizing Ray Bradbury. “It is always the art of the possible, never the impossible,” he said. So if anyone should ask which came first, the chicken or the egg, you can answer them, “Science-fiction.”
The novel in question is called “Childhood’s End.” It is considered by many to be Arthur C. Clarke’s finest work. The big reveal, by the way, is hardly its climax. The connection between devilish entities and the Utopia they seek to gift mankind with should arouse suspicion in the most casual of readers, as should the mysterious “Overmind,” never seen but is sufficiently powerful enough to make permanent servants of the Overlords. Even Ouija boards are used by humans to assimilate knowledge of them. It is furthermore no surprise that society should decompose in light of their influence, first through boredom for lack of want, and then conclusively spirals into moral depravity.
The Overlords most stunning realization is in why they were sent to Earth. After deceiving all of humanity with gifts of want for well-over half a century, the deception is finally peeled away by the narratives handful of truthers. The Overmind, that powerful being of thought and energy talked about but never seen—except once as an avatar—wishes to assimilate the race of humanity into its own collective ever-expansive consciousness, specifically through its children. This act is described by the Overlords as the next phase of evolution, and “beautiful.” Ironically, this is a step in which the Overlords have never been able to make and may never be able to. Knowledge of technology equals power—specifically of the psychological nature, but even knowledge and technology has its limitations. It must co-exist with the supernatural in order for its full intended purpose to be fulfilled, and this can only come through transcendence with the Overmind.
At last we see Earth deserted. Most of humanity has committed suicide. Only its three-hundred million strange children remain to be rounded up and collected. They have grown immensely in mystical power, and yet their personal individual identities have vanished. When the Overmind finally arrives to collectively absorb them, they in turn consume the world’s energy, and everything, including the Earth itself, is destroyed. The last generation of humans has finally transcended. The End.
It is difficult to conclude such a story can derive from anything less than a spiritually-influenced and deranged, though admittedly brilliant, mind. And yet I only bring this up because Childhood’s End eerily—and I stress eerily—describes Scientism’s own claim to our fast approaching future. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Make no mistake, we will transcend. Or rather, those who agree to it—transhumanism, that is; they will be promised assimilation into eternity. That, as we Christians know, is nothing but a disgusting lie. More precisely, it is the final damnation. All who take the mark will be eternally damned. And yet it will be perceived, or at least advertised by its administrators, as “beautiful.”
We as a people are in desperate need of a good deception. We crave a savory lie like carnal knowledge and chocolate, and have thus made a sport of it. We will pay admission to sit in a dark room in front of a grand screen and grow giddy at the knowledge that they will gladly spoon-feed the lie to us, no questions asked. A Christian, I have found, would rather hear of a toddler pulled from its mother’s breast than have his entertainment threatened. I am told, according to his tiresome foot-stomping rebuttal, that he has a God-given right to the wandering imagination of our ever-progressing narrative—the road to transcendence. For our current Scientism Overlords, we make it too easy. The lie is everywhere.
I expect Clarke’s three laws need little to no introduction here, being familiar with the most common reader. If I rehearse them now, it’s only because I employ them in an entirely new light, now that I’ve woken up from the deception. Read, memorize, and know them well. An apologist for Scientism will likely discern all three and nod his head in agreement, muttering, “Of course.”
Then again, so will the person who now recognizes the Science Delusion for what it truly is. Clarke’s three laws, he may suddenly come to realize, is either diagnosed with the masterful strokes of its genius author, or else a Dissociative Identity Disorder. He too will read Clarke’s three great laws, only with a pronounced smirk and a raised-eyebrow, as though he’s only ever glossed right over them until this very moment, exclaiming: “Of course!”
They are as follows:
- When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
- The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Do you see it too? Read it again, if not. Reflect on it. Memorize the script. The Science Delusion as a set of rules was right in front of our faces the entire time, for anyone paying attention. It came in part from the spiritually-driven imaginations of its science-fiction taskmasters, and we are asked today to partake in it—CERN and NASA and their ultimate damnable destinations—as gospel truth, even if only in the ill-advised succulence of the free-ranging mind.
“Neither Shall Ye Use Enchantment”—There Is No Land of Make-Believe in the Bible
THE CHRISTIAN MUST BE GROSSLY IGNORANT WHO ASKS, “What harm is there in magical practice, if only to pretend?” Rarely is the Christian aroused with such a temper tantrum as to face the threat of having Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone ripped forever from their bosom.
“But…but….but….!” So goes the protest. “J.K. Rowling quotes the Bible! But…but….but…. J.K. Rowling is a Christian, so anything she says of magic must be true!”
And yet the Moses writes, “…neither shall ye use enchantment, nor observe times.” Leviticus 19:26
Show me the magical land of make-believe in the Bible where we are freely permitted to go, if only to unwind. Show me where the practice of divination or soothsaying, of fortune telling or spell casting, of wizardry—either advertised as good and “helpful” wizardry or wizardry of the pretend nature, imaginative, playtime, or otherwise—is permitted with a staff or a wand or a rabbits foot or a fox’s tail or a bowl of soup or a sparrow and a crow or a sneeze or a cow to the left and a fly to the right or a crooked hat and a cape and a spider-bite and super-suit or the light saber of a more civilized age—pick your weapon—whereas lust is not exempt of adultery nor hatred of murder nor covetousness of idolatry, so too is witchcraft in all its imaginative ponderings not exempt from the lake of fire.
Show me the library or the theater where the Prophets and the Apostles and Yeshua visited to get away from it all—you know, “spark” the imagination, perhaps even make a “worship service” of it—a place where they or we today might fantasize a scenario, or be entertained by it in the least, in which the God of the Bible makes exemption for wickedness, let alone delights in it, or worse—a place where the God of the Bible does not exist to bother us at all. Wicked thoughts are an abomination, so where is the attraction in a fantasy that parts ways with the Lord?
This is the delusion I myself have woken from, having played my own part in the ignorance. It was not until the globe fractured into unrepairable pieces, having been cast down to my feet, which every spirit once contained within the ball began to arise before my eyes and dissipate into the unquestioning soul of another. A terrible burden has been lifted. I repent of these things, and declare here to any witness, I want nothing more of it—never again. I want nothing more of the globe, or that which seeks to promote the globe, or anything that finds its very existence in the identity of the globe, as the globe itself could not exist without our blindness to the supreme existence of magic in all things. The church is held hostage to false doctrine. I hereby exhaust myself clinging to the goodness of the Word and mourn the days we live in, that removing the clothing of this world should cause so much disgust and animosity within the body of Christ.
I was talking to another Christian about Flat Earth, as is my custom to do—he of course will never depart from the globe even to side with Moses, a point he’s made abundantly clear—and his only thought, with the compassion as have losing a loved one filling his jawbone and tone, was to say, “It must be such an unbearable thought, knowing how Star Wars disagrees with your Flat Earth model. I hope this doesn’t affect your movie watching habits!”
Brother, that whole line of films not only promotes the Luciferian lie, despite its most fantastical and creative forms, its very narrative, which hinges upon wizardry and divination and communion with the dead, is an affront to God. God will not be spoken to in that fashion. He will not be found in Star Wars, not in the opening crawl, neither mentioned as a contributor in the closing credits, that we should search for Him and talk about our fictional “Yeshua Hamashiach sightings” in Jesus groups, as though the use of sorcery and manipulation of nature is ever exempt for our pleasure, and especially in our self-proclaimed pursuit of good. He’s not in Oz and He’s not in Middle-Earth and He’s not on the U.S.S. Enterprise and He’s not in a comic book waiting to jump out of its page and won’t be found in Hogwarts either.
Let the protests and the rebuttals begin.
The Face of the Earth Is the Lord’s “Signature,” and Oh, How the Devil Hates It!
THE NEXT TIME YOU HAPPEN TO GLANCE AT A FLAT EARTH MAP, take special note of the various continents affectionately embedded within the protruding outer-rim of the Antarctic circle and know it is the Lord our God who, when separating land from water in the utter darkness of the creation week, personalized what would otherwise be a dull shapeless mass with his very own seal—the signet ring of heaven’s King. Take another lasting look. Gaze down as an angelic star in the firmament might this very moment—at a figured surface richly embroidered like the lavish dress of His beloved, in which the turning of dawn lifts its features from the blanketed shroud of night—and immediately recognize His emblem. It is the Lord’s signature. And it signifies one thing. What is contained within, everything and everyone, is His ownership. Thieves take note of this. BEWARE.
But let’s not forget, one starry night Satan gazed down from the heavens, and he coveted.
“(38.14) As clay to the seal.—In the darkness every object is without form and void, just as clay or wax, which has no distinctness of shape till the seal is applied, and then the impression is clear and manifest.” Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers
What the serpent of old wanted, he took for his own. First, the image of God, a man and a woman, an enlightening lie for the ages and the bite of an otherwise forgettable produce. And then the rest of the created order he sacked. He twisted and he mangled the things that were good. He plagiarized. And then when we no longer recognized what was the Lord’s and what was his, even the very address we call our home, the end-days counterfeit was complete. This is the late great planet earth—home to the delusional, proud of heart, and anyone who rebels against God’s seal of authority in the name of science is welcome.
Everything marked with this counterfeit signature—such as the globe lie—is his. Where it’s taught in the hallways of academia, with its lofty degrees and celebrated marble busts of balding philosopher-heads are his. Hollywood, with its studio logos that remind us with a bold-faced globe what la-la land we’re about to enter in, is his ministry of propaganda. The conspiring governments that administer the policies of that globe are especially his, with the money that finances the illusions of his forgery, also his, as is the media, which gives narration to his schemes. The astronauts in scuba gear are his actors. And those talent-less singers who sell their soul for a contract, they’re here for his pleasure—that is, until it’s time to pay up. What is not his, or what is left unlooted from the lot, is very little.
The Flat Earth, with features like that of a garment pressed under a seal, are the Lord’s. Everything such a proposition opposes in His Holy Name belongs to Him. But let’s not overlook the most important fact of all. Those who believe in the atoning works of our Lord and His Father who sent Him are also marked with His seal, which no man, not even the Devil, can break.
Look up, because He’s coming back to claim what’s His.
“20 And He saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? 21 They say unto him, Caesar’s. Then saith He unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s. 22 When they had heard these words, they marveled, and left Him, and went their way.” Mathew 22: 20-22 (KJV)
“Thou Shalt Not Make Thee Any Graven Image”—Including a Globular One
“BUT….BUT….BUT…..HAVEN’T YOU SEEN PICTURES OF EARTH FROM SPACE?”
So follows the typical and often immediate rebuttal from Christians when the pages of Holy Writ comes into the discussion, as if I need to be forcibly pried from the written words of the Holy Ghost in order to correct an academic illiteracy, and one certainty is made transparently clear—a graven image has been suspended so high on a pedestal as to re-imagine, chasten, and ultimately overthrow the Testimony of God. Here-in the doctrine of Flat Earth reveals yet another delusional offense against our Creator, and a damnable one for many souls. Satan has convinced the citizens of his kingdom that there is one permissible image, be it man-made, which God wishes us to uphold in our devotion to Him even as it conflicts and supersedes the Scripture in every place where the two of them meet.
This idol in question is called Blue Marble. And it’s the most reproduced image in the history of the world.
“Thou shalt not make thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the waters beneath the earth:” Deuteronomy 5:8 (KJV)
What else is a graven or molten image but man’s attempt to construe and confine the power of God, specifically to limit or alter His power and reduce Him to a parcel package that we can control? Both result from greed and covetousness, and we must not overlook the rarely spoken but painfully obvious truth; there is a fear among the worshiper of idols that God does not have his best interests at heart. As with any kind of worship, the object of adoration inevitably controls us.
The Blue Marble—every Blue Marble in a series of several released by NASA over the last half-century are proven frauds. Specifically they are imaginative artistic renditions of “data.” We do not have one “actual photo” of this so-called planet they say we live on with a negative to show for it, and yet what does the church-going Christian do with this news? When confronted with the truth of God’s revelation regarding His created order he immediately clings to the image of the Blue Marble and hugs it against his bosom, crying, “LA-LA-LA-LA-LA!” with two fingers firmly implanted in his ears so as not to give audience to any more of this superstitious nonsense. God must surely make an exception for them this one time. And besides, let’s be honest, the true goodness of God could not possibly compete with the nourishment which that person receives from the man-made image, specifically what that idol contains, or rather everything which is implied of his lifestyle within it.
Moses was not an author of frivolous or meaningless words when he wrote, “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me.”
The New Testament is as much against idolatry as the Old. Our only permissible and proper act, where idolatry is concerned, is eating with the unbeliever during their various celebrations in hopes that we might direct the conversation towards the Lord. But there is a stark warning present at all times. Under no circumstances are we as Christians given license to join ritualistic religious devotions in which we honor and worship false heathen gods, which may be the prime reason for such celebrations. God is a jealous God—rooted in divine justice and love. He demands our full heart, not slices of it.
Anything that is desired or treasured more than God and what He reveals of Himself in revelations future, present, and past is an obvious idol. Concerning the subject at hand, Paul makes this clear. Where there is willful covetousness, the wrath of God cometh on that child of disobedience. If we find God to be so boring or so negligible that we must put other things in His place that really satisfy us more than He does, as this entire Copernican apostasy brings to light, then we not only offend the Master, but we ultimately destroy ourselves.
If the Blue Marble is standing in the way of accepting God’s Testimony concerning Himself in His Creation—we call this the doctrine of Flat Earth—then a graven image is presently being upheld.
And just look at the mess it got us in.
There Is No Hope of Eternal Salvation Apart From Our Resurrection
THE GNOSTICS HAVE INFILTRATED OUR CHURCH TO SUCH A DEGREE as to keep us historically advised and at arm’s length where their deviation from the Gospel is concerned without ultimately informing us of the far more disturbing possibility. Our pillars of the faith have bled together in parts so as to adjoin at the hip, becoming indistinguishable from the other—and we’ve willingly given our consent to it. This is certainly what Justin Martyr would say to the body of believers if he were alive today. The soul, being not its own nature immortal, cannot be absent from the body, even if only to ascend or transcend to heaven and meet with the Lord, just as a body cannot live without the soul. They are in need of the other for their very survival, Martyr might explain. He knew the Gnostics well, being no friend of them—and if we claim to adhere to the Scriptures, then we shouldn’t be either.
“And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.” John 3:13 (KJV)
Man’s ascent to heaven is not the story of the Bible. Quite the contrary it is God’s descent to Earth. The former doctrine stems from the Luciferian lie of old—that wicked promise once spoken by the serpent in the garden and even now continues as advertised, same product but with a slightly different tagline. This Copernican globe delusion, with its Kabbalistic Scientism and endless hopes of heavenly transcendence, still speaks of it. The time has come to break away.
In the latter story, being the Bibles true narrative of Flat Earth, our Creator walked with man in the garden, commanding that we subdue the Earth and have dominion over everything in it. Jesus Yeshua later walked with men on the shores of Galilee, promising that we who believe in Him might be born again as an inheritor of His future kingdom, which he referred to on the cross as Paradise and where the tree and river of life will nourish the nations. Then a little further down the line, after we are woken with the blast of a trumpet, thereby following the Lord’s lead with our own long-promised resurrection from the dead, God will bring heaven itself, the New City of Jerusalem, down to the Earth, so that He may dwell eternally with the righteous. Where does our participation in heaven without the involvement of Earth show up in this?
Yet the same Gnostics which our spiritual fathers battled against simply couldn’t stomach the thought that our souls are trapped in physical matter, be it this body or a future one—let alone the goodness that God seeks to fully restore of His creation. For them, salvation could only truly come when one escapes this crude corruptible flesh and transcends to the heights of heaven. For modern-day Gnostics everywhere this belief still stands, even in the mightiest ranks of Christendom. Likely every religion on the planet makes such claims whenever a casket is introduced to the crowd.
To affirm the duality of man first introduced in the person of Adam while simultaneously embracing a conflicting view that we live on as immaterial spirits in another otherworldly plain is to be held in contempt of Biblical evidence. The testimony of the Holy Scriptures bares its teeth down upon such pagan Hellenistic theology. If Christianity has forsaken its own teachings simply to be included in the mix of mysticism, then it has lost its saltiness, particularly where the promise of our salvation is concerned. We must stand separate from the rest. There can be no hope of salvation apart from a physical resurrection. Jesus did not meet face with the Father apart from his own resurrection, and we shan’t either.
In his letter to the Hebrews, Paul—wanting to speak on more mature matters—referred to our coming resurrection from the dead as an elementary doctrine of Christ. Perhaps we, in our delusional stance regarding God’s Creation, need to take a step back from more mature doctrines and study the basics. When I was of that delusional state of mind to believe we actually live on a ball hurdling endlessly through an infinite vacuum of space, I would always refer to myself as “homesick for heaven,” as though ascension or the promise of transcendence was for my personal pleasure. And what I realize now, after casting off the Luciferian apostasies of the evolutionary globe and dressing myself fully in the Biblical doctrine of Flat Earth, is that my homesickness is for this Flat Earth apart from my God walking among us.
How glorious that day will be, our born again moment—being spiritually awoken from deathly slumber at the blast of a trumpet. Our blessed hope—to be raised incorruptible, opening our eyes to the sight of our Lord descending from heaven among the people and the Earth He so dearly loves. And forever more we shall live with Him.
If only we had a Justin Martyr in our ranks, one who might club us over the head and advise that we step back in line with our spiritual fathers, far away from the invading Gnostics, declaring: “If anybody denies the resurrection and believes that person ascends to heaven, don’t even think he’s a Christian!”
“If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there.” Psalm 139:8 (KJV)
The Worship of Intelligence Must Come to an End
THE CHURCH HAS FORSAKEN THE WISDOM OF GOD in favor of “Intelligence,” and in doing so has handed itself over into a willful and unending endeavor of foolishness. When or wherever intelligence rises above or seeks to usurp Holy Revelation, even by redefining it, the God-fearing Christian must immediately recognize that apostasies are being harvested. And yet knowledge of the Word—particularly where the doctrine of Flat Earth is concerned—has been wickedly rejected, all so that we might not come across as stupid to generations of godless schemers and their arsenal of academics who take issue with Moses. Human intellect is one of Satan’s most seductive idols, and if the Lord is to be taken at His Word, it has even constructed a house for itself.
Its address is Planet Earth.
“The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the word of the LORD; and what wisdom is in them?” Jeremiah 8:9 (KJV)
The Holy Bible has much to say of wisdom and of knowledge, but nothing regarding the doctrine of Intelligence. Funny, the Spirit speaks nothing of the Lord’s creation being globular either, which those with a dutiful allegiance to the wisdom of intelligent men, whom so boastfully and wickedly proclaim in place of God’s creation, eagerly uphold. The wisdom of this world enforces the belief that knowledge is useless without intelligence. Yet what about knowledge married with a wisdom gifted from God above? The two cannot contradict each other.
Some will say that intelligence is genetic, others that it is simply a human invention—anthropologically speaking. Might I be so bold as to suggest it is a direct doctrine of Satan himself? To worship intelligence is stupid and satanic. And yet here we find ourselves parading through a self-declared renaissance of man, as if our Lord is the architect of it all. And look at where we find ourselves with our endless praise and adoration for the intelligent man. That celebrated figure is the chief cause for unbelief in Holy Writ and the teachings of God’s Son. The redeemed must cry to God in repentance and be delivered from its snare.
We find true revival only when God’s children return to His Word. If it’s a renaissance you’re after, then the Holy Spirit is exploding with life in the Biblical Flat Earth.
“Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.” 1 Corinthians 1:25 (KJV)
Must we defer to NASA and the religion of Scientism simply on the principle that its applicants are smarter than us? Even before understanding what “Flat Earth” was, or that it was boldly proclaimed by its many writers throughout the pages of my Bible, I strictly upheld a belief in the reformers Scripture Alone, and yet the Darwinist, always peeking his head through the congregation doors to see if his beliefs are upheld, would—upon hearing my “creation-week nonsense”—immediately refer me to the men of far greater intelligence.
How dare I deny them?
Such are the churches I’ve been members of, where the preacher is held accountable by the Darwinist. If such be the case, then the Christian who dutifully applies this principle must also defer to Judaism and the sharia law of Islam and a plethora of other religions, including the atheists—anyone who western society upholds on a pedestal of intelligence, rather than obey with acquired knowledge the clear and sound teachings of the Holy Ghost.
And by the way, I have it on good word that the boys over at NASA aren’t that smart. But that’s not the point, now, is it?
“Sola Scriptura!” Casting Its Light upon the Untidy Face of the Emergent Church
“SOLA SCRIPTURA” IS AN UNBEARABLE THOUGHT TO MOST AND MANY. I must not be so gullible as to raise a banner and think the church of my peers will file in line. To the aging Baby-Boomer Copernican, the Doctrine of Flat Earth is as intolerable a truth as any, and to what remains of our church, generationally speaking, the Doctrine of Inerrancy or a belief in “the literal intent” of the Holy Ghost has little to no bearing on the Christian. Scripture has lost its Divine authority—at least in the futility of their thinking.
Here in the west we are surrounded on all sides by the Emergent Church, and in the ranks of almost all remaining congregations we find members of its society, even if they themselves do not understand their citizenship, or where they derive their thinking. The fellow who prefers “warm and fuzzy” rather than cold hard facts, experience over reason, subjectivity over objectivity, images over words, feelings over truth, spirituality over religion, tolerance over exclusivity, or the one who prefers not to be held in a fundamental box, he is perhaps such a card holder. Might I be so bold as to state they are attempting to expand God’s kingdom, at least outwardly, but not on the authority of the Prophets and the Apostles or Yeshua Hamashiach, all of whom employed cold hard facts over the warm and fuzzy, objectivity over subjectivity, and everything else that counters this sudden fleshing-out of the church’s post-modernist nightmare.
My wife and I attended an Emergent Church for three months too many. Tattoos replaced statements of faith, alcoholic beverage supplanted communion with the saints, technique-driven meditation and mystical practices such as yoga replaced personal prayer, pagan beliefs were openly exchanged, how a Bible passage “made them feel” was upheld and discussed rather than the intended meaning of the Spirit, disposing the weight of our spiritual forefathers was trivial, and methodology, like the commissioning of Elders, was altogether disregarded. The church, by the way, was exploding, as if its contributing worshipers were discovering something entirely original.
It’s what the kids these days are referring to as the new spirituality.
Dozens of converts were pouring through the doors each week in order to work themselves into fervor of feeling, likely confusing their outward expression for the presence of God they so desperately claim to cling to. Excuse my forthrightness, but their often regurgitated motto was, and I quote, “If God is present then the doctrine must be sound!” This is assuming that God was present at all, rather than the great reformers and revivalists before us, who would rightly proclaim in the face of apostasy, “If the doctrine is sound, then God will meet us there.”
When it was announced by the Senior Pastor how, and I quote, “spiritual depth in the Word” would not be pursued in his congregation, but rather “shallow rooting,” his exact phrasing from the pulpit, so that we might all share in our common experiences, this New World Order doctrine, straight from the mouth of our beloved Jesuit Priest, Pope Francis, had reached its fullest apostasy. My wife and I gave him more courtesy than he deserved, perhaps because newfound friends were present, sat through what remained of this Sunday morning funeral, and then promptly left, having never once entered our minds to return.
It is my hope in these writings that I can simply save a soul by keeping it simple and pointing that person back to the reformers call of old, Sola Scriptura, or Scripture alone. Perhaps I am not an epic dreamer, just a little one at best, and seek the salvation of one soul over a coliseum of many—but that’s the way it likely goes in the reality of the arena anyways, despite appearances.
We must employ the Holy Bible as a mirror, matching its face with our own reflection in it. Where there is error, we must adjust our lives to fit within its pages, being not too proud for repentant confession as to dare ask the Word to conform to us, lest we also become delusional in our thinking. And then there shall be no end to it, the continual heaping of apostasy. Should God allow for such a policy regarding personal exemptions of His Holiness—all so that He might pat our narcissism on the head—we are left with a far more terrible a thought, that God might always extend the measure of consequence for the disobedient child. Or perhaps we are forced to contend with the greatest nightmare of all, that He might altogether overlook any such consequence for the wicked soul.
“He Walked With God”—the Darwinian Lie In Conflict With Our True Common Ancestry
SATAN IS BY NATURE A FLATTERER AND A KNEE-KNOCKER. There are few who can withstand the cajolery of his sparkling eyes and blushing smile. That one cannot object to evolution while holding almost any position of prominence, particularly in the fields of science and academia, is evidence of his totalitarian grip. That we have so many persons, who counsel in whispers from the sidelines and confess secretly that they are in opposition to Darwin’s assertions while loyally keeping to his narrative in the forefront of their career, if even by their well-tempered silence, reveals in the most simplest terms it’s effectual power and what men will do for a paycheck. The Holy Bible is our God-given birthright. And for a few measly dollars, mankind will publicly forsake it.
The great institution of Darwin demands that we set our gaze well-beyond the cradle of civilization. Any temptation to rightly consider or settle-upon the Ten Old Men promised upon the not-so distant boundary of our birthright must be forsaken for an ongoing horizon never once recorded but in the gluttonous imagination of human perversity. We must set our sights, we are told, upon the ape.
I have held dialogue with enough so-called “Christian” Darwinists to observe some very disconcerted issues with their personal life. Admittedly, they gaze fondly upon the ape. And God, according to the testimony of those whom I’ve conversed with, does not speak to them—as if this is simply a coincidence. It is peculiar to a man of such reason, perplexing even—as strange a spiritual concept as any other—that God would make His Will clearly known to a multitude of “lesser-informed” individuals who rely only on Scripture as their final authority, this author included, rather than he who employs the full muscle of his “better common sense,” believing the Spirit will support his enterprises.
Having once politely listened in to a team of husband and wife “Christian” Darwinist’s as they explained how my infant twin sons were exhibiting “evolutionary ape-like behaviors,” I sat a little longer through their sad-sap story, particularly the man, who had devoted his life to the ministry—only so much as the Bible did not conflict with his devotion to Darwin. He was an ordained pastor, and simply did not know nor understand what it was like to hear the Lord speak and to have His will pronounced upon him. To have such an authoritative church leader smile unapologetically upon my infant sons for exhibiting “evolutionary ape-like behavior” while still holding to the belief that we were made in the image of his god, certainly not mine, and then ask what it was like to hear the Spirit’s voice, is nothing short of tragic. Such men, befuddled in the darkness of their own enlightened mind, are terrible at connecting the dots.
God has made our common ancestors known. They are the Ten Old Men. And each one of us—stemming from every tribe and nation on this earth—share lineage with the first to the last of them. Let this be an encouragement to us all. We who dine at the table of God’s future kingdom will know nothing of racial bigotry. We shall eat and drink as one completed family. Even Yeshua Hamashiach has eagerly grafted Himself into it.
The Ten Old Men are as follows:
The person who loves the Lord understands his birthright. It is his constitution. He upholds his oath of office in support of it. Contrarily, a man who thinks himself worthy of taking up the pastorate or any position of church leadership while adhering to his own enlightened thinking, believing the Holy Spirit will honor him for it, should think twice of ascribing what Satan has already given allowance for: metaphors. What he and his ambassadors cannot tolerate, why we must indoctrinate every child to set their gaze upon the ape—certainly not as metaphorical—is because of one small but incredible biographical detail regarding everyone’s common ancestor.
Let us consider the last man on that list—particularly, why he was worthy of inheriting the entire world, being the sole survivor (with his wife and children) of the Great Deluge, and therefore grandfathering every person who has since been given the opportunity to live rightly and contribute to it.
Noah, we are told, “walked with God.”
FLAT EARTH Is “Divisive” —Proof that We Must Have Nothing to Do With It!
IMAGINE THE PROPHETS AMOS AND MICAH NEVER HAVING FACED a slewing rigged with torture, Elijah and Jonah knowing nothing of exile, Habakkuk, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel never having rocks embedded in their skulls, and then imagine the many protestant reformers embracing their first eternal meeting with our Lord on any passage other than through scourging planks of wood. Imagine a history in which men of God were so loved for their carefree words that not one religious affiliate could fathom stiffening their call to action, and then we are left with the most terrible realization of all, that those who discern the truth of Scripture from worldly fiction in their own sleepy reality, one based on the biased principle of what is not “divisive,” or what is emotionally bearable to their own feeble peace of mind, likely care little to nothing for truth at all.
“Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division” – Jesus, Luke 12:51 (KJV)
There is one noble cause which brings promised persecution and martyrdom to the sainthood and that is standing upon the Lord’s proclaimed testimony of Himself. This is no doubt backed by the prophets and the reformers ageless call to repentance from the slippery slope of apostasy with a firm return to Scripture alone. Perhaps the more sobering truth to the condition of our church today, which we who embrace the doctrine of Flat Earth must daily face, is that a true literal interpretation of Scripture brings “divisiveness” to the ranks of its hibernating bumblers, who prefer their uninhibited honeymoon with the beast system—this is what really is at stake here, and what the Lord’s testimony of Himself through His created order so amply reveals to those who have repented and returned to that which we have admittedly strayed from—and the doctrinal lukewarm.
The Bible has much to say of divisive people, asking that we have nothing to do with them. But in each Scriptural case, what is the cause of division? Far too often, and we adherers to the doctrine of Flat Earth hear it regurgitated to no end, the “stop-being-so-divisive” line is used by those comfortably camped within the ranks of the majority to extinguish a difficult conversation or even deny the voice of God, if it should be lifted with clarity from the Word. Has the church-goer who discredits another Christian’s claim to adhere with a literal interpretation of Scripture, by calling him “divisive” so as to silence the cry of consciousness, ever regarded the facts of history for himself? Show me a great spiritual revival without friction within its ranks. If friction is definitively equated with divisiveness, then the powerful can appeal to their authority and therefore wickedly abuse the call for unity as a way of obscuring God’s own testimony of Himself.
I can’t help but laugh at that majority who tell Bible literalists—coincidently only when the literal interpretation fails to honor their worldly one—that we shouldn’t use social media to advocate such beliefs, should we make them look foolish, but instead must do so quietly among the authority of our congregation leaders, who will no doubt take up their cause and revoke us. There is nothing that would appease their own misdirected consciousness more than that we be silenced. How terrible it would be for them if they had to behold in their own feeble mind or even live with themselves having known that the serpent of old has been so relentlessly crafty, even beyond that bitter bite in Eden, as to deceive us all on such a global scale.
If the Gospel of Christ or the very foundation by which that glorious Gospel rests upon is under attack, or in the case of Flat Earth swept completely under the rug by the caretakers who at one time not so long ago promised to uphold it, it is then the right of every saint, educated or non, clergyman or non, to crawl through the mud in defense of it, even at the risk of being “divisive”—until the banner can be retrieved and waved high above our head. I’ve quoted Martin Luther regularly, and I’ll continue to do so, because he called the turning from the Biblically-based sound doctrine of Flat Earth in favor of the Copernican apostasy an act of wickedness. How different our world would be today had the majority listened and the empirical lie itself, which we combating few are often overwhelmed by, were suffocated rather than the voice of truth. If anyone knew of divisiveness, as accusations go, it was Martin Luther as he labored so tirelessly to preserve the unbroken revelation of our Lord. Let the reformation continue.
FLAT EARTH Brings Nothing but “Hopelessness & Despair”—Further Proof that It Is Not of God!
I WAS PASSED AN INTERESTING NOTE THIS WEEK, among the many I receive now daily concerning the subject-matter at hand—they’re a mixed bag of critical, at times hateful (with an emphasis on teeth-gnashing), while many other readers give praise to our Lord for this incredible midnight hour “rediscovery” of God’s Testimony regarding His creation. It really is an exciting time to be alive, for those who are willing to accept the Spirit’s call—to be woken up from the delusion that has shackled the church with apostate teaching over the last hundred years. But this one note in question, it was delivered from a self-described brother in the faith—in essence a cease and desist letter—who took personal issue with the Doctrine of Flat Earth because I am personally bringing him “hopelessness and despair” by speaking of it. He refuses to believe how this issue could in any way have Jesus in mind, nor could our Lord possibly be his source of “hopelessness and despair,” and as such, Flat Earth or any associated “conspiracy theory,” as he phrased it, is not welcome within an earshot of him.
“Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.” John 18:36 (KJV)
Never does this present reality, the understanding of conforming to a place or world-view, as the Apostle Paul first commanded us when he spoke, “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind… (Romans 12:2)” become more apparent and true than soon after the Spirit alerts and calls us to acknowledge the Doctrine of Flat Earth as astonishingly factual. The sun moves about us, not the other way around. True science, by the way, I am wholly certain of—the Spirit attests to it—will back the Lord up. Just don’t expect it from the foolishness of men who depart from the Revelation of God’s testimony.
I think if everyone is honest we can at least recognize the fact that, at a much deeper level, this is not an argument about the shape of the world. When the corrupt man behind the curtain is exposed to the Lord’s Testimony, and the great globe is realized as a terrible delusion, nothing more than knobs, buttons, and strings in which the “humbug” is turning, pushing, and pulling for the purpose of our agreeable submission to his causes, we must make the connection between the wondrous, wizardly illusion before us and everything in the world surrounding us, including the road of golden bricks leading us here, all of which is perpetrated and built upon that lie.
The terrible governing beast warned of by the “conspiracy-theorizing” prophets is finally exposed, but perhaps more sobering, the adulterous relationship which the church has willfully committed with it. Any believer, kindled with the Spirit and prompted accordingly to speak this message, does so because he comes to realize that the church which he loves is held captive with false teaching and idolatry. If anything is despairing to those who hold God’s Revelation as unbroken and wholly true, then this is it!
The Lord seeks our hidden hearts, not our empty actions. So when the man who means well is exposed as having participated with the kingdom of darkness, even if his actions were not intended and unconscious, what is hopeless and despairing about removing those filthy clothes, or rather not conforming to the lie? Rather, when we take this command to task and see the great evil that encompasses us and binds the world to it, our thirsts should immediately salivate for the water of life. Everything not of God will perish in the flames—this we are promised—though the man himself of such worldly works may narrowly pass through them and be saved. If—after seeing the “humbug” behind the curtain and the whole of Satan’s kingdom exposed in the light of God’s word—the observer is consequently filled with hopelessness, I can only conclude that the promises of that kingdom seems pleasing to him, and is despaired in having to turn away from what he truly loves, rather than the Savior.
Coming to the realization that we have conformed to this world in more ways than we could ever understand apart from this movement of the Spirit, and have therefore broken trust with Paul’s commandment, should bring us to repentance, knowing the Lord eagerly forgives and cleanses us of all unrighteousness. There is abundant joy in the knowledge of our salvation, but also in knowing what the Lord has created for the saving—His true creation as spoken of by Moses, the prophets, scribes, poets, and Apostles. Who we side with, when weighing our reality against the worldly wise men with what Holy Writ says of it, truly matters.
And why do we believe it—in the doctrine of Flat Earth, that is? Specifically because the Lord, in His own testimony, said everything spoken by the prophets was trustworthy and true. Science will come around in the end. If we are saved by the atoning sacrifice and blood of the lamb, marked with the Holy Ghost, then to call God a liar, whether being “frivolous in His Testimony” or “poetically dishonest” or “lost in translation,” is blasphemous. The complete writings of Moses spoke of and pointed to Jesus Christ, Yeshua Hamashiach, even in His true creation, which He intends to save.
You ask how the doctrine of Flat Earth has anything to do with Jesus, as if we can select what we will accept of Him without consequence. Our Lord the Christ, when addressing the Pharisees, spoke: “For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me; for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?” John 5: 46-47
Why do some men of reported faith reject Flat Earth? Perhaps because all they must give up of this world to follow the Lord brings hopelessness and despair, being one reason of several. The Gospels are filled with men who found despair in Christ. But who are we truly rejecting today when presented with Biblical facts, a non-circumstantial shape of the Earth, or the Lord’s own testimony of Himself? If Jesus Christ, Yeshua Hamashiach, has nothing to do with this, then are you and I even addressing the same Master? At this point it’s hard to tell.
Yeshua poised this very question to every man when He asked, “But whom say ye that I am?”
We Trust No One in FLAT EARTH—None But God Alone
ANOTHER INTERESTING CONVERSATION I HELD while writing this book—and indeed there were many—is with a beautiful woman who had become somewhat acquainted with “the doctrine of Flat Earth” over the last year. Our discussion on the matter revealed that she was well-churched, her past service to that institution was of the highest devotion, her understanding of Scripture was well regarded, and there appeared to be no cognitive dissonance between what the doctrine states in accordance with what her lifelong readings of Holy Writ readily implies. Another words Flat Earth was not beyond her realm of belief. And then as we were talking the matter over something terrible happened.
She gazed into the abyss.
No-no, not a horizon always rising to eye-level or the expansive surface of water without a convexed arch to it, or a moon clearly giving forth her own light, or the constellations which fill our sky remaining fixed as they always were since the Creation week; she had already looked for the curve and knew it couldn’t be found, not even in the Bible. The darkness she saw with her own eyes, it seems, was THE LIE itself—most notably everything that came with the lie. If terror filled them, with disparity quivering in her tone of voice, it’s because something about the LIE was magnetically attractive to her—the comforts otherwise offered too beautiful to turn away from, even if it be in the bosom of the kingdom of darkness. The world itself, the woman let me know in so many words, she loved.
She finally said: “If what you say is true—if the Earth is flat, as the Hebrews believed—then there’s no one left to trust—nowhere left with goodness to turn.”
I said: “You can trust in God. And you can turn to the Bible to meet Him.”
She looked at me, with that deep and terrible abyss filling her eyes, and she said nothing.
Her lips trembled.
And we parted company like that.
What this Flat Earth doctrine confirms, the reason I believe the Spirit is lavishing His Company upon the remnant Saints and filling their lamps with midnight oil is because we are witnessing a separation, if you will. Perhaps it is the wheat and the tares which Jesus spoke of in Matthew 13:24-30, I can’t say. If we brush off God’s Testimony with an air of mockery as something which doesn’t need second thought, or if we do contemplate the matter but reject it wholly because the wisdom of this world and all the comforts which it can afford seems better, perhaps even more profitable, what does that imply of us? I am not the judge of a man’s soul, nor does a man need to be right about every doctrine or even made aware of it in order to be saved, but if there’s one thing which this doctrine illuminates upon a dark place, it’s what the rejection of Flat Earth so regularly confirms. Where we place our trust and our hope and our faith, it’s often in almost everything but the Lord.
She was right about the wickedness of our world. Indeed, Satan is deceiving a great many, and hell is far from filled. Man is not worthy of our trust, if they should counter what the Lord testifies as true or worse, conspires against Him. The Bible makes this case transparent. God Himself should be our source of everything—especially our adoration and praise. Whatever Earth that beautiful young woman chooses to remain on, flat or one with curvature, my only hope is that she does so because her faith and her hope and her ultimate comfort is not in the institutions or profit of man, which will fade and be forgotten from our memory, but in the eternal embrace of our Lord.
“Seek the Lord and His strength, seek His face continually.” 1 Chronicles 16:11 (KJV)
“I Think, Therefore I Am!”—Humanism’s Assault on FLAT EARTH
RENE DESCARTES HAS INFILTRATED FLAT EARTH. Indeed, the gate is flung wide open, and the great commanding general who leads all ranks of humanists has helped himself into the camp of God’s elect with his legions of agitated bed-wetters filing in behind; grunts, plebes, and non-commissioned officers alike, all of whom arrogantly stomp upon the Reformers banner, “Sola Scriptura!” all so that their own Luciferian slogan might be carried out. “I have woken! I have woken! I have woken!
In as little as a year or two they easily have outnumbered us, demanding that our baton-holding in this relay is done. And their mandate is clear. Religion, they tell us, is not welcome in Flat Earth. It should come as no surprise that the theological statement of Descartes and his humanist friends insists on absolute freedom from God’s act of creation, despite the shape of the Earth. This is a fundamental of fundamentals, for the humanist assures us that man is sufficient of himself to determine truth without God’s help, hence his often-regurgitated motto, “I have woken!” Here the Christian must depart. He knows that there are no other recoverable treasures of wisdom and knowledge except by the acknowledgement of God (Colossians 2:3). Only in God’s light can we see true light (Psalm 36.9). The Christian is in no need of the humanist to fund our cause. Yeshua Hamashiach has already paid our price with His blood.
I happened to come across an older man living in South Carolina. He was actually the elder of his church; a Baptist denomination—and if the mockery of his deceased father stoked the tender coals of my soul, it’s because his father believed the Earth was flat, and only, that church elder claimed with an ironic twist to modern-day hypocrisy, because “the Bible told him so.” Make no mistake about it, despite Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, Newton, Darwin, Einstein, and so many other conspirators against the Creator, or in his father’s case, a live viewing of the end-times Great Delusion lie—the ’69 NASA moon landing in real time—The LORD has always had a faithful remnant of believers, even if few in number, who bowed down to no other God, neither any other created order, but rather stood completely with His unbreakable revelation
No-no-no! Here we stand humanists. We’re not leaving.
Western philosophy is rotted to the bone with the gangrenous stench of humanism. On this foundation society cannot stand. Its adherers certainly owe their granddaddy a great deal of gratitude. On one hand, Descartes accepted Thomas Aquinas’ challenge to build upon his “philosophical knowledge” rather than “sacred knowledge.” Yet on the other he outright refused to accept the authority of any philosopher but himself, hence his wording in the treatise commonly called Emotions. He would write on this topic,“as if no one had written on these matters before.”
For the secular humanist, his own ability to doubt anything but himself supplants the greater existence of God, accordingly. Was not Descartes’ magnum opus to state, “I doubt,” and after months of careful cognition, finally conclude, “I think, therefore I am?” Most certainly, it was. Western philosophy, for the most part, rests on this very principle. The act of waking up to “I Am,” as his pupils flagrantly proclaim, is a cause they find satisfaction in. And yet the very bones which such an argument depends upon for support splinters before he is able to stand, for he has already presumed his own existence by stating, ‘I’ when proclaiming, “I doubt!”
The true Christian does not begin with the presupposition of his own existence. For him it is, “In the beginning, God…. (Genesis 1:1).” There is no need to explain to him, “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge (Proverbs 1:7).” These principles are well understood. The Christian cannot even conceive of knowing anything with certainty without first consulting God’s existence, and secondly (but no less important), committing to such knowledge fearfully. We are told nothing could exist should God not exist (Acts 17:28). The existence of God is the most sacred truth. God decides truth, not the man with the ability to recognize his ability to think. Truth cannot therefore be something which occurs to us, not even because the wink of a philosopher’s eyebrows or wave of a wizards hand has convinced us otherwise. We cannot wake ourselves up to it. Without the Spirit’s intervention, we are dead to our sins (Colossians 2:13). Instructing anyone that he or she can do so, should they willfully comply, is to pull them back into the very deception which changed the shape of the world in the first place.
The Christian must understand this in order to be saved. Truth happens only because God spoke all things into existence, and therefore he must be consulted in all matters, lest we fall into yet another terrible globe delusion. “Thy Word is truth (John 17.17).” And we should expect our salvation to be no less, for Yeshua Hamashiach, being made perfect, “became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him (Hebrews 5:9).”
The humanist has arrived in Flat Earth with greater numbers than our own, yet shivers at what is written within God’s Word, even if they should mutually agree on the shape of the Earth—that is, being revealed by His own Testimony, which states in no uncertain terms that it is not a globe but stationary. If the Bible proclaims the Earth to be stationary, despite the church’s overwhelming rejection of such truth, it furthermore directs the humanists’ attention to its Creator, just as it should. He knows a domino effect when he sees it, for it will also let him in on the fact that he has fallen short of God’s glory due to the inheritance of sin, with the acknowledgement that salvation, our cleansing of unrighteousness, which comes through His Son, Yeshua Hamashiach alone, will force his hand. This is why the humanist wants nothing to do with us. This is why he demands, after crashing the worship service; that we leave—because he must be undeterred. Knowledge of anything outside of his own mind is suspect.
The ironic twist to all of this is that they, the humanists, have woken up only to themselves. Despite their claims to the contrary, the truth makes them dreadfully uncomfortable. They have tragically woken up to the gargantuan expansion of their own self-enlightened perversities. And should this trend continue, they shall easily make an eternity of it, always waking up to a tormented reality apart from the truth of the Savior. Indeed, there will be no shortage of humanists in hell, always proclaiming their damnable gospel, and demanding that it be held to, “I have woken! I have woken! I have woken!”
God Has Chosen the Very Least of Us to Inherit FLAT EARTH
THE INVITES WENT OUT MILLENNIAL’S AGO—MOSES AND THE PROPHETS, as well as the poets, scribes, and Apostles all had a part in it. But it wasn’t until a few hundred years ago that the rejection slips starting coming in. I am of course referring to the Doctrine of Flat Earth, and for over a century the pastors and leaders of our church, though being thoroughly trained on the subject, have outright, and perhaps even wickedly, denied it. Now look what has happened. Our address has changed. Not only that, but God’s Testimony has become a subject of mockery even to the so-called elect who claim to love Him. We rejected the truth with the carefree ease as one who cleans his closet of outdated fashion, clearing only the smallest itty-bitty parts of it thinking that no one would notice. And then Satan moved in, collecting what scraps he could from the wastebasket, and establishing his kingdom upon it.
Look around and see for yourself this scurrying rebellion of Flat Earth vermin. We’re a sorry-looking lot, aren’t we? And yet God smiles upon us. If finding flag-bearers to declare His kingdom through the full unbroken Revelation of His Word means picking from the bottom of the barrel, it’s for a lack of willing workers. I myself am the last in line, and think nothing more of myself but to volunteer in submission. For every one of us there are another hundred men in whom we could barely keep afloat with, if we were to meet on the stage of debate, and yet in the face of this latter-rain outpouring of the Spirit, we shall meet with them anyways, knowing they choose to remain in the bed they made.
The reason why our current congregation of believers rejects Flat Earth is not because they cannot, but simply because they won’t. God will not have philosophers, speakers, and statesmen, men of renown and wealth, nor soldiers of the cloth in His Company who purposely err in the truth of God’s Word if and most certainly when such action should prove to benefit them, as Yeshua made painstakingly clear with the Pharisees. Making light of God, giving weight to the Words which suit one’s personal pleasures while treating others with the whiff of a feather is to be carefree with the soul, and is a damning offense of the world.
If they cannot accept it, we soon shall see, and most certainly already have seen, a changing of the guard. Unbeknownst to the old scholar, who has befuddled and darkened his vision through the pride of his covetous knowledge, the wisdom of this age is handed to the disagreeable man on the back of the bus, whom nobody seems to look twice at, or the fellow making online videos with sun-beaten skin and the funny accent of a simpleton, covered to the rim of his muck boots in the filth of his cow pasture. He gains a following in those who sit around simply to mock him, thanking the Lord that they are not at all like him, and yet God will have His prophets, even when, as history proves, they will not be listened to.
The poor man with no effectual value to the self-proclaimed wisdom of society, with nothing to show for in the way of wealth, is often more unashamed of God, I have found, than the holy man of the cloth who has made the letter of Scripture the study of his life and needs the affection of man to fund him. It is a wonder of Christ’s grace that He has chosen the very least of us, that here among the publicans and sinners the call remains so effectual—and as such the Testimony becomes complete.
If we were not God-fearing fellows, I think those of us who ascribe to the Doctrine of FLAT EARTH should faint from dread when acknowledging the mammoth task laid out before us. We have no worthy leaders assigned to our cause, as the praise of worldly men would have it, nor are we personally capable. We’re shepherd boys standing before an entire army of academic Goliath’s. But fear not, because the Lord is on our side, and His unbroken Testimony concerning Himself and His Creation will forever stand. Anyone who opposes God, even by willingly denying His Word or taking the surgical knife to the Holy Ghost in order to cosmetically please human reason, will be handed over to the very delusion they so willingly long for.
Biblical Cosmology in Thomas Ken’s “Doxology”
Praise God, from whom all blessings flow;
Praise him, all creatures here below;
Praise him above, ye heav’nly host;
Praise Father, Son, and Holy Ghost
Afterward and Special Thanks
THIS BOOK WAS WRITTEN IN A FOREIGN LAND. I authored its various thoughts and rabbit-trail expressions while exploring the rolling farms of Prince Edward Island, the picture-perfect fishing villages and wooded wonderlands of Nova Scotia, and finally the archaic and stunningly-romantic avenues, not forgetting the corn and berry-fields, of French-speaking Quebec. This was my summer in Canada, with foxes and beavers, porcupines, bald eagles and the occasional hoot of an owl to keep me company. The thought first came to me that a book of this subject matter might be plausible while gazing eastward from the palatial gardens of Main’s pristine coastline. I managed very little internet for research. But I did have books at my disposal, some which I was able to accumulate on forgotten cobweb-adorned shelves along the way, and my prayerful thoughts to guide me.
It should be noted that my current profession is as a stay-at-home dad. More specifically, my wife and I travel full time on the road, mostly. It is a simple life, the vocation of an RVer, where afternoon swims in the local river and breezy strolls down what might as well be a nameless avenue furnish our hours, with campfires often bookending the day. I am perhaps being too carefree with my words. This book was written with toddler twin boys on my lap. A stay-at-home parent will immediately acknowledge what perhaps they and I alone secretly know, that not all is as it appears when 24-hour parenting is involved, particularly where simplicity is concerned. But in-between meals and diaper changes, clean-ups and fight break-ups, as well as pushing them on swings or chasing them down, sometimes even swapping a punch-bowl between the two when vomiting should strike them in unison; I managed scribbling my thoughts down well enough. After the dreadfully long ceremonious process of putting them to bed each night, despite protest, and then making sure they stay in bed, I abandoned sleep to write this book, always watching the clock—it’s hands seemingly moving faster than time should allow for—and taking note of the approaching hour when my twin sons would wake for breakfast and the seemingly eternal process should begin again.
Being a juggler, as so many parents are, I am also relieved to announce my twin sons were potty-trained during these tiresome writing sessions. While I may have spoken much about FLAT EARTH in the pages behind me, in actuality, my mouth frequently employed such words as: “Poo-poo, pee-pee, potty,” and “uh-oh, accident!”
Much else has been sacrificed. Without a single argument struck, never a bullet fired or stone slung, friendships and family relationships have been severed, all as a result of FLAT EARTH; or rather, my pursuit of it. I have followed through in obedience with my conviction—specifically a prompting of the Holy Spirit—to take the Testimony of the LORD literally, as He intends truth to be measured, and this has endangered the lifestyle of those who wish the issue will simply go away. And yet, what choice do I have? To deny God’s Testimony would be to forsake my Lord.
Special thanks are in order, particularly Cathy Dunson, who by Divine appointment reached out to me, not the other way around, and made this book a reality from its ground floor conception simply by encouraging that it be done. Thanks must also be made to Zen Garcia, who has taken it upon himself to oversee my progress. As of this final writing, we have never met— neither Cathy nor Zen and I. Hopefully this oversight shall soon be remedied. And I shan’t dare overlook my wife, who exchanged the warmth of a husband in bed for many cold Canadian nights while everything you see here was fleshed out.
But I have only so far spoken of the living. Thanks must be given to the dead in Christ, those who exhibited the courageous spirit and character of our LORD and Savior by adhering to His full written Testimony, even as it pertains to creation—that being Flat Earth—among the mockery and discrimination of their fellow churchgoers. There are so many to number that I would exhaust these pages trying, and so shall limit myself only to the drop of one name.
As a 19th-century Londoner, Lady Blunt was as Godly a woman as any. Despite what she may have perceived by the end of her life, perhaps a failing effort on her own part, well over a century later the fruit of her labor is shown. I do not believe this book would have been written had it not been for her inspiration. Her powerful editorials in The Earth Not a Globe Review lent me my voice.
And when we someday meet in the Lord’s kingdom, I shall place Lady Blunt’s hands in mine, as a sister to a brother in Christ, and gratefully exclaim, “Thank you! Thank you! Thank you, for everything you’ve done!”